Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who's in Charge?!: CPA Official Contradicts Washington on Shahristani?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:48 PM
Original message
Who's in Charge?!: CPA Official Contradicts Washington on Shahristani?
:wtf:

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/international/international-iraq-shahristani.html

Iraq's Shahristani Reluctant on PM Role
By REUTERS

Published: May 26, 2004


Filed at 2:35 p.m. ET

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A nuclear scientist who had been tipped to become Iraq's interim prime minister hinted on Wednesday he might reluctantly take the post, but an official in the coalition authority ruled him out of the job.

Confusion surrounded who would take the role after the official contradicted earlier comments by U.S. sources in Washington that Hussain al-Shahristani would be the prime minister.


Shahristani, who was jailed and tortured at Abu Ghraib prison under Saddam Hussein, said the process of choosing a prime minister was not yet complete and other candidates were being considered.

...

Contradicting reports from U.S. sources in Washington on Tuesday that Shahristani would head the new government, a senior official in the U.S.-led coalition authority told Reuters in Baghdad he would not be chosen as prime minister.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. my dumb local paper ran the triumphant headline :NEW IRAQ PM CHOSEN!
whOooOoopS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think that's the impression Washington wanted us to have
They were dying for a happy ending. Now they look (once again) like idiots who have no clue about what their people in Iraq are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestmoi Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Better now rely on it for any terror updates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestmoi Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. "until now he's been most conspicuous for his criticisms oo the US"
Do you wonder if his being very critical of the US might be a reason why he might not be accepted?

According to Financial Times
"Mr Shahristani, 62, has until now been most conspicuous for his criticisms of the US. Less than three weeks after the invasion last year, he voiced complaints about the behaviour of US forces in an interview with the Financial Times.

The Americans, he said, "have committed some very serious mistakes".

http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullS...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's possible.
It's also possible that the CPA knew he didn't really want the job. It seems like another case of the "silly dreamers" (aka neocons) in Washington trying to wish their dreams into reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. thks for resurfacing this..perfect example of our rudderless, inter agency
Edited on Wed May-26-04 03:02 PM by pinto
maneuvering, deadly quagmire called foreign policy. Iraq has been downsized from a "crusade for the Mid East" (which was patently disconnected from any sense of reality) to a game of tug-of-war between State and the DOD.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. He would have to have a death wish to want this job.

this will be a thankless job with no real power, and he will
have a big fat target on his back... no thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC