|
... there's no need to kill him. If the US actually wanted to be rid of him, they could simply pick him up and deposit him on the Jordanian border, whereupon the Jordanians exercise their longstanding warrant for his capture and drop him in jail.
The interesting thing about the DIA report was that it seems not to have been generated entirely internally. It was, according to one news report a couple of days ago, prompted by a dossier provided by Jordanian intelligence. The Jordanians want him in jail--they absolutely don't want him running Iraq, so the suggestions that he's been playing both sides against the middle with Iran would be consistent with Jordan's intentions for him.
In Iraq, Chalabi has been doing everything he can to mobilize the Shi'ites around him, as a means of generating public sympathy for himself by sympathizing with them, the purported majority in the country. It's a highly political move on Chalabi's part, but it also puts him in good with the Iranians. The Iranian ayatollahs would very much like to see a Sharia law government in Iraq, to which they could readily build alliances. A religious goverment in Iraq would also take off some of the heat internally in Iran for reform, temporarily, anyway.
Chalabi thinks he can get what he wants by using these associations--and it's abundantly clear he wants to run Iraq himself. What he might not realize is that the Shia politicians will use him in whatever ways they find necessary, and then be rid of him.
But, the simple evidence that the US has not picked him up and handed him over to Jordan--the simplest thing and the one requiring the least public explanation ("we have decided to comply with Jordan's request for his extradition")--means that one element in the White House and the Pentagon, the neo-cons, want Chalabi running things.
If Chalabi isn't arrested by the US for spying, isn't turned over to Jordan on the embezzlement conviction, then the neo-cons are protecting him, likely because they are as corrupt as is Chalabi, but also because they are afraid that, if Chalabi sees no opportunity for a place in the permanent government, he'll spill the beans about all the forged documents he was passing to the neo-cons to justify the war, and make it clear that some of those forged documents were supplied by the Iranians.
The neo-cons have always thought they had the inside track on the Iranians, ever since the Iran-Contra deals. If Chalabi suddenly exposes that the Iranians have been playing the neo-cons for fools, making the neo-cons look like bumbling idiots (which, of course, they are) just before the elections, what happens to Bush (and the rest of them) then?
The neo-cons could make the Chalabi problem go away instantly. Simply arrest him and hand him over to Jordan. In jail in Jordan, what little credibility Chalabi has now disappears. But, the neo-cons won't do that, for two very simple reasons--greed and ideology. Chalabi is their privatizer, their route to making lots of money via Iraq when they leave government (the opportunities for legal graft with a completely privatized oil system in Iraq are enormous).
And, their ideological stance toward Iraq would be bolstered by keeping Chalabi in a powerful position, that their intentions were true, their intellectual estimations of how things would go justified, etc., just so long as there were a Chalabi around to repeat the administration message from inside Iraq to the outside world. That situation wouldn't persist forever--eventually there would be wholesale rebellion--but it would last long enough for the neo-cons to escape with the cash and go down in the near-term history books as the liberators of Iraq.
In short, Chalabi is still free because the neo-cons want him to be, regardless of the DIA report or the actual political situation inside Iraq.
Cheers.
|