Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flashback: Zinni accused of antisemitism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 03:47 PM
Original message
Flashback: Zinni accused of antisemitism
Of all the reckless tactics used by the right-wingers, I don't know if I can think of one more irresponsible than to play the antisemite card. If anything, crying wolf hurts the cause of fighting real antisemitism.

Here, it seems the definition of antisemitism is merely to identify such a thing as a neoconservative.

Glad to hear that it didn't shut Zinni up. Why this twit Mowbray is still working who knows.

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/joelmowbray/jm20031231.shtml

Discussing the Iraq war with the Washington Post last week, former General Anthony Zinni took the path chosen by so many anti-Semites: he blamed it on the Jews.

Neither President Bush nor Vice-President Cheney—nor for that matter Zinni’s old friend, Secretary of State Colin Powell—was to blame. It was the Jews. They “captured” both Bush and Cheney, and Powell was merely being a “good soldier.”

Technically, the former head of the Central Command in the Middle East didn’t say “Jews.” He instead used a term that has become a new favorite for anti-Semites: “neoconservatives.” As the name implies, “neoconservative” was originally meant to denote someone who is a newcomer to the right. In the 90’s, many people self-identified themselves as “neocons,” but today that term has become synonymous with “Jews.”

And if anybody should know better, it’s Gen. Zinni. It is well-known that those who are labeled “neocons” within the administration—whether the number-two official at the Pentagon, Paul Wolfowitz, or undersecretary of Defense Doug Feith—are almost always Jews.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
charlyvi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. They will play any card
The "brown skinned" people card, the "unpatriotic" card, the "flip-flop" card, the "anti-Christian" card. These people have a whole deck of cards to play. My only hope is that they play so many of them, people will finally wake up and realize the Kool Aid they're trying to sell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Karen Hughes gave the latest
pro-choice = terrorist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. They will play any card or use any argument to discredit the character of
those who are brave and honest enough to expose the corruption of this inept administration. They tried to do it to Richard Clarke, Joe Wilson...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Grasping at straws...
and this is, after all, townhall.com, where Coulter and the rest find just how low they can go.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some of the same "yer an anti semite' nonsense we see here ....
Zinni is a staunch defender of freedom, no wonder the Neocon hate him .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. isn`t amazing that the word
semite doesn`t mean anything close to the word -anti semitism. interesting how words their meanings change over time. no wonder people write things that really have no basis in fact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alerter_ Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. They forced Democrat Jim Moran to resign as Whip for "anti-semitism"
When he was asked by a Jewish woman why there were not more Jewish people against the war, Moran said:

"If it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for this war with Iraq, we would not be doing this," he said at the forum in Reston, Virginia. "The leaders of the Jewish community are influential enough that they could change the direction of where this is going and I think they should."

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/03/14/moran.remarks/

For this "outrageous anti-semitic" remark he was forced to resign as Minority Whip - even Nancy Peloi got on board to trash him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. who's "they?"
I don't see the connection between the stories, and the people making the charges are NOT the same people.

In the story I posted, the charge is made by someone with NO legitimacy, a TOTAL HACK at the National Review.

In the story you posted, the complaints came from legitimate Jewish and democratic voices.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. ADL trashed Zinni too.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. link?
what exactly did the ADL say, and did it in any way resemble what Mowbray wrote?

Did the ADL say anything anywhere near calling Zinni antisemitic?

i.e., are you smearing the ADL?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Moran's remark WAS antisemitic, and it was also a lie.
It was a lie because Jewish Americans supported the war in the same proportion as other Americans.

It was also a lie because it falsely assumed that Jewish Americans had the power to stop the war.

It was antisemitic because it charged Jewish Americans with a special RESPONSIBILITY to stop the war. W is everybody's problem. Laying blame on an ethnic minority to fix it is inherently racist, and everybody goddamn well knows it.

That's what Moran did. Hopefully no one here will do likewise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. AIPAC supported the war.
Edited on Sun May-23-04 06:16 PM by Classical_Liberal
This has nothing to do with the Jewish community. Moran like most politicians falsely assumed AIPAC represented Jews. That doesn't make Moran and antisemite because Aipac does everything in it's power to promote this impression. How come everyone that wants Kerry to take a stronger stance against the Iraq war and against Sharon's latest atrocities is warned that we will lose the Jewish vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Well, that didn't take long. Just like clockwork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alerter_ Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. he said the "leaders" could change course
and that they should. He was correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. It was an inherently threatiening message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alerter_ Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. what are you talking about?
"It was an inherently threatiening message."

How?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. Hinting at consequences for Jews if they don't change their opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Where did he do that?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. not to add fuel to the fire, just trying to be accurate. . .
"Jewish Americans supported the war in the same proportion as other Americans" is not a true statement. In February of 2003 59% of Jewish Americans favored war with Iraq while only 44% of the population at large did. (I only did a search on that date because that was my interest. The percentages of course changed over time.)

I have noticed some Jewish Americans who wouldn't agree with Bush on anything agreed with him on the war. Jewish Americans vote for GOP presidents about 20-35% of the time.

As to the issue of Zinni being called antisemitic, remember David Brooks did an op ed in the NYTimes saying there was no such thing as neocons and talk about neocons was antisemitic. He later apologized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. Have a link for that poll?
Edited on Sun May-23-04 08:51 PM by Darranar
It isn't consistent with what I've read.

And in February 2003, far more than 44% of the public supported the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. I think Jews were actually MORE against the war...
then most Americans.

Like most minorities, American Jews tend to be liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. That may be so. The problem with Moran is that he tried to hold Jews
responsible for failing to stop the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. His comment was stupid and innaccurate, certainly...
not sure whether it qualified as anti-semitism or simply stupidity and ignorance, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. “neocons ”term has become synonymous with “Jews.”?
SEZ WHO?
First I've heard of it.
This guy makes it up as he goes along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I've heard it many times
I've heard William Kristol and Richard Perle say it when people first started talking about PNAC, before the war.

Most recently, David Brooks wrote a column where he said it, and was forced to apologize for it when many people, including some DUers, complained. He said he was only joking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. Yeah, really. Didn't realize Cheney had converted.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. I remember when that ridiculous article came out.
Didn't the author backpedal it just days later? As I recall, he tried to say that he was only talking 'a few people' who are anti-semitic. An assinine non-apology for an assinine article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Zinni mentioned this on 60 min.
he spared the pitiful author Mowbray by not mentioning his name.

And 60 min. helped lend credence to the scurrilous accusation when they listed prominent neocons, they left out the non-Jewish Rummy and Cheney.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alerter_ Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Rumsfeld and Cheney are just as Neo-Con as the Jewish ones
of that there is no doubt. Neo-Cons are a coalition of right wing Republicans and right wing Likudniks with Christian and Jewish fundies as their cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. Wish I had a nickel for every time someone pulled the antisemitic card here
I would be one rich man.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Just keep repeating this mantra: Arabs are Semites too. Arabs are
Semites too. Arabs are Semites too. Arabs....

But of course it's not the same thing. And of course if we just pull out of Iraq--coitus interruptus--there will be no more images of pornographic violence, because there will be no more pornographic violence.

Poor "Brown" people are the cheese--er, the peacemakers, and not subject to the usual failings of humanity. And of course it's not reverse racism to imply that.

Of course it's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
41. NNN0LHI - you may be interested in this
It's the origin of the "criticism of Israel = anti-Semitism" meme in an article definitely worth reading in its entirety:

Halper: Yes. Anti-Semitism feeds on the idea that Israel is a victim. The Foreign Ministry of Israel invented a new form of anti-Semitism in the last few years called the 'New anti-Semitism,' and they then found some professors willing to give it some academic credibility. The New anti-Semitism that is now being spread all over says that any criticism of Israel is anti-Semitism, period. And it has been very effective.

http://www.fromoccupiedpalestine.org/module.php?mod=book&op=print&id=806
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. "Neoconservative" doesn't mean someone who's a newcomer to the right
and this is a blatant bucket of feces in the face of reality. Neoconservative is a tag applied to internationalist/expansionist conservatives, and is used to denote the split AMONG THOSE WHO ARE ALREADY CONSERVATIVES on the issue of isolationism. The Neocons are imperialists on a bent for world domination. Yes, the group is dominated by hardcore pro-Israel-at-any-costs nutcases, and there is definitely a strong Jewish contingent among the group, but it is not just that. Take it from one who has long picked fights on the subject of extreme enabling of Israel within our government.

Cheney, Rumsfeld and Jeb Bush were all signers of the letter to Clinton in '98, and they're lifelong conservatives and gentiles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. This is exactly right.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. James Woolsey
big time PNACer, not Jewish. Slots Bennett, not Jewish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. I found a mention of neocons (including DEMOCRAT
Daniel Patrick Moynihan) from a 1979 issue of Commentary Magazine.

It is not antisemitic to point out that many of the early neocon leaders were disaffected Jewish intellectuals who began their intellectual life at the left end of the political spectrum.

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/Summaries/V68I4P76-1.htm

The Neoconservatives, by Peter Steinfels
Nuechterlein, James
FOR over forty years now, America's liberals and conservatives have spent most of their time arguing, in one way or another, about the New Deal. That conflict lingers on at the level of...

Vol. 68 • October 1979 • No. 4

http://www.pbs.org/arguing/nyintellectuals_krystol.html


http://articles.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0ICQ/is_2003_April_28/ai_101023113

But in truth, the neocons--an intellectual school with roots in the City College of New York in the 1940's--have been astonishingly well-coordinated, organized and consistent in their message. Originally, a neoconservative was an anti-communist liberal who rejected the 1960's counterculture. After the Cold War ended, neoconservatism came to be associated with an aggressive foreign policy. It was clearly defined by Mr. Kristol the younger and Robert Kagan, a contributing editor at The New Republic and The Weekly Standard, in the 1996 book they co-edited, Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in America's Foreign and Defense Policy, which warned of the growing threat of terrorism and suggested pre-emptive remedies. In December 2002, Max Boot asked in his Wall Street Journal column, "What the Heck Is a 'Neocon?" His answer: "Neoconservatives believe in using American might to promote American ideals abroad." Not surprisingly, neoconservatism has since become the fast-and-loose, catch-all term for hawks--although the nuances between neocons and other varieties of conservatism remain stark on some issues.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BBradley Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. If I'm an anti-semite for hating neocons, then so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
29. Is Cheney Jewish? What about Rummy?
Was Wellstone a neocon? Is Michael Berg a neocon?

This line of attack is desperate, wrong-headed, and even evil in the way it exploits the history of the Jewish people. Those who employ it should have their asses swiftly and thoroughly kicked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. WTF is townhall anyway? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. ultra conservative, RW site - check out home page and list of columnists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. TOTAL BULLSH*T...why even post this?
Anyone on EARTH with a brain would know that neoconservative does NOT equal Jewish.

Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC