|
oh boy, this could be an essay. Just like here, where all Americans take the rap for our leaders' bad decisions, Israelis and Palestinians both as a people take the rap for both Sharon's hardline policies and the suicide bombers. Not all Israelis want the aggression that Sharon exhibits to be a future for their children, and very very few Palestinians are suicide bombers or support that kind of violence. We should be helping both Palestinians and Israelis, but we need to do it without taking sides, which we seem quite unable to do. The rest of the Arab world has a classic "underdog" to defend in the Palestinian state, and Israel's policies toward the Palestinians and our support of those policies makes Israel (and America) seem deserving of hatred to many in the Arab world. The answer to your question about how America continues to be as biased as it is is simple: there are Jewish (pro-Israeli, rather than religious) political action groups and there are Palestinian political action groups here in the states. The PACs with the most money, membership, economic and voting power are able to get the most time in front of our policy makers. That will change over time as other middle easterners become more Americanized adn involved in the political process here, and as they become a stronger political and economic force in their own right. A more cynical view is that Israel affords us a strategic foothold / ally in that part of the middle east with access to a fairly well developed military machine and its infrastructure, something that a Palestinian state does not right now. A critical thinker will find himself under assault for criticizing anything to do with pro-Israeli policy as being anti-Semitic, which is really a republican straw man argument, and even humorous since some of us critical thinkers are Jewish by birth and/or practice. Always feel free to criticize bad public policy.
|