Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it normal for a candidate not to have a running mate this late?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 07:58 AM
Original message
Is it normal for a candidate not to have a running mate this late?
Historically speaking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. n/t
Edited on Mon May-17-04 07:59 AM by freetobegay
ON EDIT: Kerry is the presumptive nominee, not the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Good point! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. it's actually considered early right now
i think it would be unusual if kerry made the decision around this month. from what i understand he will probably make the announcement shortly before the convention so maybe in late june or early july.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ok - thanks. That does make sense.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Believe it or not...
The nominee used to announce this at the national. Reagan changed this when he ran in 1976 and announced his before the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Seems normal to me
I seem to recall that they're usually announced at the convention, although I could be wrong. Anyway, Kerry would be crazy to break up this news cycle with an announcement right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. yes
Dab Quayle was not chosen until te week of the convention. Probably the biggest reason is that it gives the opposition a secod target to shoot at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. This late!?
This early, is more like it. JFK wasn't picked at the Democratic nominee in 1960 until the waning hours of the convention, and that was in September, forget about his VP choice.

This election is very unusual because it started so early. The VP choice will come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. If there was a VP before the convention
that would be the earliest in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. It seems late because we got a presumptive nominee early
Edited on Mon May-17-04 08:17 AM by daveskilt
normally we would only have had an idea of who the nominee is for half the time we have known it would be kerry. Hence the news guys have nothing to talk about (heaven forbid they focus on shrubs plummeting approval, failed policies and failing oil war) so the who is the VP talk started months earlier than usual. This make the short attention span of americans start them longing for the conclusion they are used to getting in 30 minutes from their other TV entertainment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Waiting is a good thing.
...as Martha S. would say. Right now, you hear it in the media every day. Somebody "leaks" a fake list of names, and the press is all over it. Positive/negative reactions to some of the names is duly noted. Since you can't hold a primary for veep, this is the way to get the public's input without committing yourself. Besides, the longer he waits (until convention time), the more buzz it generates. You can't buy buzz with any amount of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. In 1960 JFK didn't even announce
he was running until some time in January that year. In 1968 RFK didn't declare until the middle of March, after the New Hampshire primary -- which was in March that year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. You mean before the CONVENTION that
..says he's the candidate?

Hell yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. When they announced...
This is a brief list of when candidates announced their running mates going back to the 1988 election:

Dukakis : July, 1988
Bush I : July, 1988
Clinton : July, 1992
Dole : August, 1996
Gore : August, 2000
Bush II : July, 2000

All announcements were made close to the convention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
15. thought the nominee/VP is usually announced at the democratic convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff in Cincinnati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. So you're saying that there's still hope...
that Kerry might choose ME!

Hey, I live in a battleground state and I can deliver up to a dozen votes (that's assuming that me and the missus vote four or five times each).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC