Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Kristol on "The Daily Show" says Kerry shouldn't be elected because

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:28 PM
Original message
Bill Kristol on "The Daily Show" says Kerry shouldn't be elected because
Bill Kristol on "The Daily Show" says Kerry shouldn't be elected because:

Kerry would get the US out of Iraq within 4 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey we need Mister Krystol to put on a uniform
pick up his rifle and go walk patrol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. We can only hope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kristol was QUITE a sissy!!!
Man, even HE seems to be exasperated with BushCo!!!

I smell blood...

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Kristol's argument was
Kristol's argument was:

Bush has badly carried out the war with insufficient troops and allowing rioting, but electing Kerry would send an anti-war message (even though Kerry wants to send more troops) so we must not elect Kerry.

Bush is going to magically start managing the war well once he starts his second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
35. They had a calm discussion based around the facts
and Jon Stewart destroyed him. He didn't even look like he wanted to put up a fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoedogg Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. His most telling comment...
...after basically conceding every point to Stewart:

"I need to get my game face on when I get back to Washington - in New York, I can afford to be honest."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. You are shitting me
I've gotta see that rerun. Kerry could use that in his ads...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. the quote was something like
the quote was something like

Kerry is not going to spend four years of his term running Bush's war.


Which doesn't really lend itself for use in a tv ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Such a weird interview and Jon more aggressive than he
usually is in questioning guests. Yes, things are achangin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Jon Stewart has said more than once recently that
Jon Stewart has said more than once recently that it isn't a choice between trying-to-promote-democracy-through-war or doing nothing.

The US can try to promote democracy in peaceful ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yes, diplomacy is much cheaper...but can you convince the Iraqis it's ok
to commandeer their oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immune2irony Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wish we would have left Germany and Japan immediately
upon conquering and occupying them. It set a poor precedence of colonialism and imperialism that has dogged us from Korea to Iraq. What is our business defending these countries? So their ruling class can grow fat and rich? I'm disgusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Germany and Japan have a ruling class?
Explain that for me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Actually, Japan does
but they're largely harmless except for indulging in massive financial corruption.

They're at least thinking about the future and making appropriate plans, which is more than I can say about our bozos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. sure, the soviets would not have occupied either of them.
good call buckaroo. we wasted a ton of money on the marshall plan. didn't get much back either, just a stable europe for the first time in centuries. and in japan, why those bastards, they went and built a stable democracy the world's second largest economy.

its just terrible what they did with our support, dont you think?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immune2irony Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. So how is Iraq different?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. hahahaha! why don't you tell me what is different about iraq
shall we start with the difference between japan and germany declaring war on the US with the resultant deaths of hundreds of thousands of americans at the hands of those two nations. nah, too easy for you.

or that each of those nations were in ruins due to the war, nah too easy for you.

or that each nation had borders with the soviet union with its armies perched on these borders ready to invade if given the chance. nah, too easy for you.

ops, forgot that the soviets did invade japan in 1945 and held some of its northern islands, and held them for decades.

or that both germany and japan were industrial nations whose peaceful development were necessary for rebuilding the world economy, nah, too easy for you.

but clearly you dont seem to differentiate between a joint defensive military presence of the victorious allies and the new governments of japan and germany from a colonial police force.

now, you tell me of the similarities between the allied presence in japan and germany after ww2 with the current coalition forces in iraq based upon the world economic, political, and military strategies listed above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. In Japan:
the emperor had told the people to submit to the American occupiers and cooperate with them, so they dutifully did so. The occupiers were mostly left-wing idealists of the New Deal generation, and they quickly instituted social and economic reforms that won the favor of the populace. They did not allow looting, they did not torture prisoners, they did not exploit the resources of the country, and they moved quickly to put an indigenous government in place. In the entire seven-year occupation, there were no incidents of G.I.'s being murdered by Japanese resistance.

In Germany by the time the war ended, the country was so obviously on its last legs (they were drafting 12-year-olds, and all major cities lay in ruins) that Hitler no longer had any credibility, so people were too exhausted to resist and were mainly concerned with survival. The Americans helped out by distributing food and other supplies, which was a striking constrast to how the Germans had treated the countries they occupied. Again, there was no looting allowed, no torture of prisoners, no stealing of the resources of the country (the Soviets did steal resources in their zone), and cooperation with existing indigenous resistance figures such as Willy Brandt and Konrad Adenauer to form a new government. No G.I.'s were killed by German resistance. The Western zones of Germany were completely free within four years.

Now, nearly fifty years later, we have Iraq. Compare and contrast, especially on the point that Iraq hadn't invaded anyone in 2003 and had not even tried to invade anyone since 1991.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Maybe this was because WWII was considered a justified war.
I remember kids in high school, busting to be old enough to sign up. It was a very patriotic time and it cut accross the whole population, not just a right wing bunch of flag wavers. If the PNAC (our American Nazis) keep up this march to world domination, we may see the same type of patriotism from other countries directed toward us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. I'm sorry
I agree with much that you say, but in Germany, our soldiers were still fighting hardcore Nazi's until 1947, though they were not nearly as organized as those in Iraq. And there were some fatalities, though less then what we're seeing now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
27. Nope.
It may be past time to leave, but our presence was required in both those countries at the time. WWII & the current situation had quite a few differences.

You're a real class warrior, aren't you? Obviously a far-leftist, as all must be who who post here. (Or maybe not.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. He also said that Kerry has been very responsible
What it seemed to come down to is that he agrees with Bush's worldview, which he should because the PNAC gave Bush is worldview, I guess. And other than that he really didn't have a good thing to say about him. This is really very good. He knows that the administration is full of incompetents, starting with Bush. This is excellent stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldenOldie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. You don't turn your back on a viper
Krystal is and has been the mouthpiece of the Neocon's and has been involved with the PNAC. If Krystal said anything good about Kerry he has a motive for doing so and it ain't good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reverend_Smitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Jon Stewart is the best political talk show host on tv
He can talk to people that he completely disagrees with like Kristol keep it a civil conversation and still win every political debate.

Good interview tonight, Kristol was really grasping for complimentary things to say about shrub!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. That's because Jon Stewart's attitude is...
Humor first, politics second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #20
30. That is why The Daily Show will win us way more converts than Air America
Air America with it's Rush wanna-bes and harsh rhetoric will please the faithful but won't win converts. Humor is our very best weapon. Humor and Satire. The Daily Show Rocks "Big Time"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushwakker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'll pay your airfare over to Iraq tuff guy Bill
and you can take Krauthammer and Safire with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. The best question to Kristol was:
You mean Bush drove us into a ditch, but he's the guy I trust to drive us back out?

Kristol slipped and said "Bush drove us into a ditch.....er...ah...no, not a ditch, just off track.........

I would think it is difficult to get Kristol to slip like that! Good going Jon!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. Jon handed Kristol his hat. Then Jon pissed in it
He had Kristol skating backwards the whole time.

Damn, that was good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
24. "I feel like when I'm in New York . . ."
". . . I can afford to be honest."

Too bad Kristol said this right at the end of the show as Jon was wrapping up. What a damning statement.

We now know from his own mouth that every word Kristol writes or utters in his "real" job is a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
25. I couldn't care less what Bill Kristol has to say. Traitor to democracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendofbenn Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
28. democrat
he isnt a registered dem is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Who, Jon Stewart or Bill Kristol? I'm guessing you mean Jon
b/c Kristol is a Repug through-and-through.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doomsayer13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. Kristol is a Republican
one of the architects of the Republican Revolution of '94. Stewart is on the left, but I'm unsure of his party affiliation. I assume he's a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doomsayer13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
32. the guy might as well be campaigning for us
what a great idea, out of Iraq in 4 years, he should be out there rallying our troops. With enemies like this, who needs enemies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC