Questions not being asked, but SHOULD be, of the WH:

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

1. Does the photographing of the "humiliated" prisoners in fact represent part of the official policy of the Army, in order to further humiliate the prisoners and be used for blackmail or intimidation of other prisoners? (MAKE THEM DENY THIS!!)

2. Have steps been taken by the administration and DoD to stop destruction of any other photo/video or other documentary evidence at other prison sites in the Middle East and GUANTANAMO? (MAKE THEM DENY THIS!!)

3. Rather than being an aberration, do the acts depicted in the photos from Abu Ghraib (released and unreleased) represent a campaign of torture or "pressure" being followed in other military prisons including GUANTANAMO? (MAKE THEM DENY THIS!!)

4. Is MG Geoff Miller's policy of MP's "setting favorable conditions" for interrogation STILL IN EFFECT and being followed, not only at Abu Ghraib, but GUANTANAMO and other military prisons? If so, what behaviors constitute "setting favorable conditions"? Could we have examples? (MAKE THEM DENY THIS!!)

etc....

[robbedvoter]

1. What was the object of the interrogation? The result?

What great info justified this? (Randi)

[MsUnderstood]

2. What about the contractors

How will the White House try and punish the contractors who are also responsible for these acts? How will the White house punish the companies who supplied the contractors for these acts?