Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rummy's gone within two weeks. Here's why.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 09:31 AM
Original message
Rummy's gone within two weeks. Here's why.
Edited on Mon May-10-04 09:37 AM by John_H
As all DUers know, Herr Rummler is despised by most of the military top brass--they hate the way he micromanages stuff he knows nothing about, the way he pays zero respect for their careers in service to their country, and the way he tries to get their boys killed unnecessarily. (The excuse that the political appointees in the Pentagon Press Office put out--that they hate him because he's a visionary and they are dinosaurs--is utter BS).

When the pictures became known and things started going south in Iraq the Generals made their move. The first batch came out. Then you get the stories about how many officers think the war is lost and rummy's to blame. More pictures follow before he gets up from his testimony chair.

Ol' Rummler may be amoral, but he's no dope. He knows it's payback time. That's why he tried to inoculate himself on Friday. It's too late, though.

The Generals have won. Now that Bremmer and Powell have officially covered their asses by saying they warned Rumsfeld. Now that the Abu Grab MP's have lawyers saying this goes way up the chain of command, and it probably does, I'll bet you a hundred Bucks Rummy's toast within two weeks.

Rove is not going to let this fiasco take a single vote from Chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree
I now think they will dump Rummy because they have to dump someone high up over this. Perhaps Gen. Meyers too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think you're oversimplifying here
Everything you said may be true... but do you REALLY think they're going to get rid of the war mastermind right in the middle of the worst fighting? It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation for the Bush Regime, but I think they're just going to count on the American people's historically short term memory on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think they'll give him the boot
but only if it's politically beneficial for the Chimp. Not for any other reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. But that's part of the point...
Rumsfeld has truly proven himself unable to wage war effectively, aside for the whole torture scandal. If they want to maintain any sort of effectiveness in Iraq, Bush chould fire him on those grounds alone. Rummy screwed things up from the very beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. You're missing the point
Edited on Mon May-10-04 10:05 AM by sirjwtheblack
They can't just fire the one person with any clue of what's going on right in the middle of the war, even if he sucks. You also have to remember that any replacement they offer is going to be subject to a confirmation process, and I don't think the Dems are going to let them off easily with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. But, but...
The "point" is that Donald Rumsfeld himself obviously *doesn't* have a clue and NEVER DID. He's been famous for a long time now for ignoring the informed advice of his military subordinates in favor of advice from chickenhawk neocons. And there are any number of capable people who could do his job better (that's assuming the Bushies have any interest in finding a truly capable person, of course). I cannot imagine why you would characterize Rumsfeld as "the one person with any clue of what's going on" when he clearly is not that person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. well, it's a mixed thing
I obviously think Rumsfeld's fucked up big time. That's not how the Bushies perceive things though. With that in mind, I don't see them doing away with the one person they feel has any clue about the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I don't believe they will do it voluntarily...
Rove doesn't want the boat rocking..

He wants to keep the team intact and
is fearful if Rumy goes they're cooked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. The military...
... must have 10,000 officers who could do Rummy's job better than Rummy has.

They may keep him, but it won't be because they "need" him.

I'm betting he falls on his sword in an effort to divert attention from the CiC (Chimp in Chief)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. "Need" and perceived need are two different things
Bush thinks he needs Rumsfeld.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. powell got with his military buddies
oh wouldnt that be a hoot. bah ha ha ha. all that has gone on with powell. and the military know him, and he was truly with doing the best for military, the only one on their side.

that could be how they know the pictures will come out if rummy tries to hold them and not give to public.

interestinger and interestinger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniorPlankton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not so simple, IMO
If they kick Rumsfeld out, it may start a chain reaction. So far, they have defended all their shit (and shit heads)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. If they let Rumsfeld go, it can be played to our advantage...
If they don't let him go, it can be played to our advantage. I'd prefer to see him go. But it's fine if he stays as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sebble1 Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. not so sure
70% of those polls want him to stay.

I would think Bush would listen to the polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Bush always listens to the polls. He polls on whether to wipe.
But the Rumsfeld polls will change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. Rummy is gone.
Edited on Mon May-10-04 10:13 AM by JM
When Bush took the WH, he stated he was going to run the WH like a business. As a result, we have the similar effect of what happened in Viet Name for different reasons. Many blame our demise in Viet Nam on congress dictating policy. In the case of Iraq, it is clearly based on the idea of running a war on a budget.

How in hell do you justify sending troops without equipment? How do you justify pulling heavy armor and replacing it with no armor? Then there is the issue of using subcontracted labor to get around Congressional oversite and accountable cost. Don't even get me started on the Bush Administration's "Premature Iraqulation" with Shock & Awe while an entire heavy armored division was on ships. We did the same thing in Afghanistan, not surrounding the enemy. Once is a mistake, twice is a pattern of behavior, and the second time they had the convenient excuse of saying "it's Turkey's fault".

We get hundreds killed, thousands injured, and a prison crisis as a result of Rumsfeld's downsizing model for warfare.

There is little surprise that the generals and Powell hate him. He is an idiot.

When Bush declared he wanted to run the country as a business, there is little doubt in my mind he meant Enron.

JM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. Everybody's lining up to give Rumsferatu the "Godfather's Kiss"
Bush, then TinMan say "Get off his Ass!" and Condom-Sleezie is supporting him, too.

This is so when he accepts the short sword wrapped in paper from Rove, they can all say "He was SO good in the job, We'll miss ya, Don baby!"

They're setting him up and I'm smiling like a possum eatin' shit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmylips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Right! Rumbutt is Cheney's whore...
and daDick is the one in charge. You don't think daDick will give up his power. DaDick aint got a heart, power is all he has left.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. I am inclined to agree, but the wild card is Bush's mental instability.
There is no telling what that crazy fucker will do. Other than lie about it.

FIRE THE LIAR

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
17. I predict a general cleansing of higher ups at the Pentagon.
Rumsfeld gone. Wolfoshitz gone as well perhaps. Maybe a Memorial Day Massacre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC