Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What would be the defense for the soldiers involved in the torture?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 04:18 AM
Original message
What would be the defense for the soldiers involved in the torture?
Edited on Sat May-01-04 04:19 AM by rumguy
1. Poor planning: a few were put in charge of many prisoners.

2. Poor training: they were given little training in what was expected of them, and the confusion was greatly compounded by outside influences.

3. The setting: they were wrenched from their homeland and placed in a prison with a history of evil. It seeped into their souls.

What happened was wrong, no doubt. It was sickening.

But...should they be sacrificed on an alter of outrage?

edit: minor corrections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe something more novel.
As I understand it, some civilian contractors were in the prison giving guidance (not quite orders, but close) to the troops.

But the contractors are exempt from all the rules.

The troops might have perceived that what they were doing was approved of, even encouraged.

Maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yep, that would be an opening...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. The contractors
as well as the troops involved all fall under the rules of the Geneva Convention if you read it.

2. The following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever, whether committed by civilian or by military agents: (a) violence to the life, health, or physical or mental well-being of persons, in particular: (i) murder; (ii) torture of all kinds, whether physical or mental; (iii) corporal punishment; and (iv) mutilation;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. So far this is what I have read.
Odd the service men would do as the "gun for hire mercenaries" would want unless they had been told to by some one higher up. The service is about orders but I think there are orders you do not have to do if they are not in the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. They need to be punished
for their lack of common decency toward their fellow man BUT that punishment show go right up the chain of command for the lack of supervision of the people in charge of those prisoners under their care. No exceptions should be allowed as each person is responsible for their actions or lack of action. Anytime a situation exists where there is a group with absolutely no power whatsoever and another with all the power, the ones with power will and often do abuse it. A situation such as this should never be allowed without regular announced visits from and independent group of observers with private access to the prisoners to listen and see what is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. amphetamine-induced psychosis - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. All of the above and NO they should not
be sacrificed and made into the scapegoats, this should be taken right to the top and the blamed placed squarely where it belongs (at the top). :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. "Kennedy and Byrd made me done it"
"The wasn't supportin' me. They been sayin' bad stuff about me. Made me feel worthless, all alone, inhuman. That's why I was laughin' at the nekid Iraqis. If it'ern't fer Pres Bush's love, I'd a done killed myself by now."

PS: Best move for Rove would be to get the perpetrators to give pro-Kerry sound bytes. Hope I didn't give anybody any ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. If that doesn't work...
Edited on Sat May-01-04 05:36 AM by Scurrilous
...they can always blame their behavior on Clinton's penis. The 'Clenis' defense is all powerful and NEVER fails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. cutting taxes
Cutting taxes may actually be the best solution if we really want to address the root causes of this sort of horseplay.

Or maybe it's the fault of feminists and homosexuals. What do you think, Pat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. imagine if this was all happening under clinton........
they'd have already hung him in the white house lawn.
but they protect bush and ignore the treasonous acts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. Two problems:
1. They were inventive.
2. They clearly enjoyed it.

They aren't about to be sacrificed. They're about to have their asses handed to them for breaking the cardinal rule: The dimwitted twits took pictures AND THEY GOT CAUGHT.

They're too stupid to be allowed out in the rain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. lets commit war crimes....AND FILM IT!....woo woo
they are jackin' off in public stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qanisqineq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. there is no defense for them
they cannot claim they were stressed from too many prisoners... they are smiling and happy in the photos. Claim poor training? Ha! The military is trained in the Geneva Convention. Away from home and scared? That may excuse someone being "shoot first before you get shot", but never happily torturing someone. My husband spent 10 months in Iraq and would never have done this shit. He sat and watched in absolute disgust.

As an army wife, I will defend enlisted soldiers for "just following orders" for quite a few thingswhen they are young and scared, but these people were happily performing these atrocities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. uh, research!

You know, checking whether Hussein's secret police and 'rape rooms' and stuff really did what Iraqis say they/it did!

It's just prelim work for the prosecution at Hussein's trial.

</sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
13. Best Defense?
"What would be the defense for the soldiers involved in the torture?"

1) Turn it into a partisan issue
2) Ignore the war crime
3) watch more TV
4) vote for the Yale Graduate

"But...should they be sacrificed on an alter of outrage?"!!!

Oh perish the thought...let's not have public opinion decide the fate of these misguided, poorly trained, poorly planned fools! Let's ...

1) pray for their conversion
2) integrate them into our communities
3) watch even more TV
4) have them tried as war criminals

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. Sacrificed on an altar of outrage?
You must be joking! These soldiers took part in heinous abuse and they don`t need training to know that is wrong. I wonder if you would be so forgiving if the culprits had been Iraqis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
16. no fucking excuses
Edited on Sat May-01-04 06:10 AM by matcom
lets discharge them and set them loose unarmed in Fallujah

no fucking excuses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hel Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
17. They were bored?
Honestly, I can't think of an excuse of the sadism of that people, cheerfully torturing other human beings and taking pictures proudly smiling of their accomplishments. War and murder might be excused under circumstances, but this is just plain evil, having no reason or a consequence other than causing pain and shame for the prisoners.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. "Just following orders"....
Let's see how far up the chain that goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
19. Horseplay
Just fooling around, no harm meant. Plus all the other excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. some folks are just sadistic
we've all run into a few, they have no place in the u.s. military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
20. apologists for this kind of depravity aren't hard to find
some of them are even DUers. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingpie2500 Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
24. This guy says he didn't have a chance to read geneva convention!!
One of the soldiers, Staff Sgt Chip Frederick is accused of posing in a photograph sitting on top of a detainee, committing an indecent act and with assault for striking detainees - and ordering detainees to strike each other.

He told CBS: "We had no support, no training whatsoever. And I kept asking my chain of command for certain things ... like rules and regulations."

His lawyer, Gary Myers, told the Guardian that Sgt Frederick had not had the opportunity to read the Geneva Conventions before being put on guard duty, a task he was not trained to perform.

Sounds like a great excuse for abuse to me!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1206725,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
25. They could imitate their commander-in-chief and blame it on
Clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
26. No Defense, did the crime, do the time, hang head in SHAME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vladimir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
27. Should they be sacrificed!?
Imagine these were Serb soldiers and Albanian prisoners. Would you really be posing this question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
28. Here is what to expect
They recieved orders. Their actions though visually horrendous did not do physical harm. They may not have understood the cutlural implications of some of their actions.

From this we can conclude that their punishment will be lite if not already served. The commanding officer will recieve the bulk of the punishment. The real criminals in this affair, the Mercs and the person's who brought the mercs into this and gave them authority, will be moved into the shadows and due to the noncompliance of the US in the world court, they will be untouchable. This of course will not sit well with world opinion and we will slide further into the depths until George and company offer up a sacraficial lamb or close ranks and hide their head in the sand even deeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
29. Geneva Convention
Now they're claiming they had no training in Geneva Convention protocol for POW's, which is a lie because that is covered in basic infantry training. Even if, and this is a stretch of the imagination, they had no training in POW rules, it defies common sense to believe that you can essentially sexually abuse POW's, photograph yourselves in the act, and there would be no repercussions. Face it, these guys were sadistic idiots and they're now serving as multi-media recruiting posters for Al Qaeda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC