Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Administration Under Fire for Iraq Spending

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Quetzal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 03:52 AM
Original message
Bush Administration Under Fire for Iraq Spending
Bush Administration Under Fire for Iraq Spending

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration is under fire from U.S. lawmakers who complain that only a tiny portion of the $18.4 billion to rebuild Iraq has been allocated and some funds are being diverted for security and administration costs.

As of March 24, only $2.24 billion has been earmarked according to an early April report prepared for Congress by the White House.

"They appropriated $18.4 billion for Iraq and precious little of it is being spent for reconstruction," said Dave Helfert, a spokesman for Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee said on Friday.

"We need these public works projects to improve the lives of the Iraqi people and yet we can't build them because of the security situation."

more...

http://news.findlaw.com/politics/s/20040430/iraqcongressfundsdc.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. I still see this as going to blow up in to something big.
Where is all the money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imax2268 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm curious...
whatever happend to the 87 Billion...what exactly did that pay for...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's what Congress
wants to know and is trying to find out. I see some of it on C-Span if I catch it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. the 87 billion had 22 billion for re construction
that is what isn't being spent. The rest went for Army stuff like paying Halliburton to feed the troops etc. Some was earmarked for coalition "support" (read bribe) But the Pentagon needs more now that they has all the fighting. War is expensive ya know all those bullets and such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC