Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guess who's really to blame for the abuse of Iraqi prisoners? Clinton!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:12 PM
Original message
Guess who's really to blame for the abuse of Iraqi prisoners? Clinton!
that's apparentely the case if you listen to folks on freeperville. Supposedly Clinton set such a terrible example as commander-in-chief the troops decided it was OK to act this way. yeah that makes sense, I'm sure that while these folks were doing this they were thinking the whole time "of course this is OK, after all Clinton got a blowjob from an ugly intern!"

Is there anything in these people's minds that is not the fault of the Clenis? I wonder if these people have nightmares at night about the terrible things Clinton is planning against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. they are mentally disturbed
And, by the way, I thought Monica was kind of cute. That one picture that got shown so much wasn't very flattering though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Lordy
pitiful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. ROFL
Well, hopefully in November, they will have a new punching bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. My money is on Taft
The current state of the military ,which reflects the current moral climate acceptable in the USA, goes back to Taft, gotta be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. So ...
Clinton got a blowjob in ... when was it ... 1998? Then our troops go to a foreign country - six years later - and rape/torture/humilate prisoners because Clinton had consensual sex? :eyes:

Yeah, right ...

I think it's far more likely that our troops are getting the message from the current pResident that non-white, non-Christian lives aren't worth shit so do whatever you want to them! :grr:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. I already said that in another thread, butterfly...
Clinton did it! Clinton did it!

Or, they did not know they were doing anything wrong...no one had spelled out the Geneva conventions to them....

It did not say specifically that you could not stack naked prisoners into pyramids...take pictures of them....etc, etc...

Just like shrub's excuse that they did not know the exact time, flight numbers, seat numbers, etc. of the planes, so they could not prevent 9/11.

You have to spell everything out for them, and then, Clinton did it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadHead67 Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Subject: I KNEW IT ! ! !
Subject: I KNEW IT ! ! !
Message:


It was Bill Clinton that made those prison guards abuse their prisoners ! Now that the mystery is solved I'll be able to sleep tonight. (Do Repiggies have 'clenis' envy ?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Hi DeadHead67!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroubleMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought I saw that one of them had a cigar

and why was that prisoner wearing a blue dress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. they're psychotic. I don't know why you'd bother
Edited on Fri Apr-30-04 11:27 PM by maggrwaggr
to go there at all.

Seriously, their cognitive dissonance is at a level equalling schizophrenia.

i.e. Bush could be ax-murdering children live on TV and they'd blame it on Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. I guess 3 years of *'s high moral character weren't enough to
sway them from the influence of bad boy Clinton. And to think, the Clenis only had an eight-year reign sandwiched between true believers Saint Ronnie, Holy Ghost Poppy and Jesus Incarnate Arbusto! I guess the influence of *their* presidents is nil!

Neither was the love and message of their Saviour, Jeebus, enough to sawy them from the evil actions of Clinton. I guess their god is pretty weak!

Neither did kicking ass in Iraq sway them from the evil of Clinton, nor the gutting of the middle class, nor the give-aways to the rich!

Neither was the fact that their political party controls the entire government and the media enough to break the power of Clinton!

Who knew the power of the Clenis was so all-powerful...so omnipotent!

Wait! I just realized:

THE CLENIS IS GOD ALMIGHTY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tactical Progressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Are you saying
that Jeebus is the only begotten son of Clenis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. You have got to be sh!tting me!
I guess I shouldn't be amazed at the extent to which those fools will blame Clinton for everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. dupe - self-deleted
Edited on Fri Apr-30-04 11:43 PM by stopbush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. The clenis lives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. As usual, they're grasping
at straws.

Someone please wake me when there's an original thought emanating from the flat-earth-society. YAWN!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. i knew when the WSJ started blaming Enron on him
it was a matter of time before clinton gets blamed for inventing cancer and AIDS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. When in doubt, always blame the evil Clenis!

"Yeah... that's the ticket!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. A hundred years from now, your great-grandchildren...
...will be readind how Clinton's dick smashed into the World Trade Center.

Count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. I also heard them blame..
"women and gays in the military."

I'll admit, I was very disappointed to hear two women were participants in this, since I would have hoped that women would be somehow more compassionate. Certainly, you could argue that the fact that this puts women on more equal footing. No one can say women don't have the stomach for brutality, and no one will call these women victims (except their attorneys).

But, as I told my husband earlier, the people involved in this incident were clearly homophobes, not gays, since they decided to force the men to pose in homosexual situations as a means of humiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianeG5385 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
20. I had an argument tonight with my sister
Who said none of this would have happened if Clinton hadn't lowered the moral tone. We were discussing "LOUDLY" by the end of the conversation. Luckily, I know she is deluded and love her anyway, so we segued to the Giants game. 12-9 Giants btw, they needed it! I can't put my mind around her arguments. She is , however, an example of the swing voter. She does not plan to vote for Bush* but she sure argues his case! Scary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
21. Yep, Charlie GIBSON Did an Hour on Cheating in Schools
High school, college. He had a panel, like Frank LUNTZ, of kids, supposedly representative of their generation, who had all cheated on tests, essays, and he asked them why. This 14-yr old little schmuck said that it was because CLINTON had "lied when he said 'I didn't SLEEP with that woman'." The brat even cheated on the quotation, besides not knowing what "sleep" means. And of course Charlie just ate it up, like he had found the first cause in the universe.

This would be the same Charlie who did the hit piece on the phony medals/ribbons crap last week. But his history goes way back. When he cornered CLINTON, CLINTON finally errupted, saying, "O.K., I'm going to be HONEST with you NOW..." and Charlie said, "What have you been BEFORE?" "Honest" in this context is a Southernism meaning, "brutally frank, blunt, rude."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC