Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Death Squad Shuffle?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 04:13 PM
Original message
Death Squad Shuffle?
Yesterday the Honorable John Negroponte was confirmed by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to be Ambassador to Iraq.

Negroponte has been accused of promoting, condoning, or minimally papering over the activities of death squads during his tenure as Ambassador to Honduras. All old news. Said Negroponte to the Senate FRC, "I do not believe that death squads were operating in Honduras." Good answer, apparently.

Anyway, some have asked whether the reason why Negroponte was chosen for the Iraq mission has to do with his unique skills in abetting or hushing-up reports of death squad activities (e.g., Negroponte, a Torturer's Friend).

But wait. There's no evidence of death squads being active in Iraq, is there?

Bwahahaha.

People, let me tell you.

  1. US contractor recruits guards for Iraq in Chile
  2. US military in torture scandal
  3. Iraq Victim Was Top-Secret Apartheid Killer


Let me ask you all this. When you hear that one civilian was killed by insurgents, and that another civilian was freed by insurgent captors, do you suspect that the insurgency has a pretty good handle on who's really a civilian, and who's a paramilitary thug? Are they better informed than we, the US citezenry? Wow. How could that be? We have a free press, transparency in government, a system of checks and balances....Don't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Death Squads: Policy or Paranoia?
Which is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Last time before slinking off to Jerry Fletcher land
anybody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. abberations or modus operandi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatelseisnew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. A mysterious group was killing al sadr's militia men in Najaf last week
I don't have a link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thulfiqar Army?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1477503

There was another story about possibly Sistani's militia assassinating young Mahdis in Najaf? And Sadr's spokesman last week accused the US of using peshmurga to do its dirty work. But I haven't seen much beyond rumor and speculation.

Juan Cole tracks this pretty well.

http://www.juancole.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good morning Conspiracy Nuts, Vigilant Citizens alike
Edited on Sun May-02-04 10:30 AM by gottaB
Several recent news items bolster my argument.

1. The captors of non-uniformed foreigners in Iraq appear to distinguish between paramilitary combatants and true civilians.

1a. The "no longer being a captive" of Thomas Hamill. Perhaps he is just a truck driver. The sad truth is that corporate media cannot be trusted to make that determination.

2b. The disclosure that the four Italian captives had been heavily armed hours prior to their capture, until they were disarmed by US forces. Why were they disarmed? Details are sketchy. Know this: Fabrizio Quattrocchi, the captive who was executed, was packing a lot of heat for a baker. No, he wasn't even a baker. At minimum, to describe his use of deadly weapons, one could say he was a "security guard," although the actual situation of his employment remains unclear. (See my earlier post on Quattrocchi's captors, the Green Battalion).


2. The Assassination of intellectuals (See this post from lbn, Death to those who dare to speak out). Well, that's exactly the kind of thing paramilitary death squads do. Sometimes you will see people defend the activities of security guards, mercenaries and even assassins becuase, it will be said, they perform a useful military function. Killing people who express their thoughts also meets military objectives. That doesn't make it valid, decent, or acceptable s.o.p. It's a specious argument. It leads away from the truth, which is that intellectuals in Iraq are being terrorized by as yet unidentified paramilitary forces.

As the facade on the occupation crumbles, it becomes clear that the US is using paramilitary death squads to meet some of its objectives in Iraq, and that the decision to deploy these resources is not emerging organically from the anarchic unrest and "untidyness" of a free people, but is being visited upon the people of Iraq with great violence and malice aforethought.

In all probablity you will not read in the Paper of Record that Paramilitary Death Squads Murder Another Shiite Cleric, Negroponte Lies. That, however, will accurately describe what will happen, should everything unfold according to plan.

On Edit: Typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's tough
being ahead of the curve. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC