Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Puzzling: Rumsfeld was never asked for his advice for going to war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 08:06 PM
Original message
Puzzling: Rumsfeld was never asked for his advice for going to war
but why would he ADMIT this on Chris Matthew's show? Let's assume that Bush talked about this for months before he actually made a decision (which we believe, since he was apparently obsessed with Iraq from the beginning). Even if he discussed it all the time, one would think that, before making a decision, he would sit down with his cabinet for a more formal *lift-off* type meeting. But he didn't even discuss it with Rumsfeld. And according to Woodward, he also left Powell out of the loop, and told Hughes and Rice first. But, again, AFTER presumably he and God had a little chat.

WHY would Rumsfeld want to admit this? Is he deliberately attempting to make Bush look like a looney? It doesn't appear to be strong to rush ahead into war without consideration with one's cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Streetdoc270 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. One would think...
A rational, sane person would consult with the Sec. Defense before starting a war.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, but Rummy gave plenty of advise...
...and supported going to war. Aren't the rats the first to abandon a sinking ship?:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because it is an election year..



And the Repuke strategy is to pain the president as strong and decisive....Rumsfeld isnt running for office, so he gave the "credit" to Bush.

Doesn't matter...if Iraq keeps going the way it's been going Bush is going to lose in a landslide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Freudian slip?
And the Repuke strategy is to pain the president

Hey, isn't that our job? I love it!

KMA - my intent is not to be a spelling Nazi. I just find it hilarious that you typed it that way. It's almost like it was accidentally on purpose. }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Nope, not that clever...
Just forgot to type the T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe when the international war crime trial
starts, Rumsfield wants to stay out of prison.

(Okay, just a guess.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. I was just asking my husband about this
after seeing Barry McCaffrey on CNN, saying that he simply did not believe that Chimpy hadn't consulted his administration, but instead believed they were "dissembling." Why would they do that?

Mr. Sparkly's guess is that the Chimp blurted some untruths or "inartful" statements to Woodward ("I'm the one in charge" type bragging) and now the rest of the administration has to back them up rather than admit he was lying.

Is that plausible? I can't think of a better explanation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's what I saw, too, and McCaffrey (on Olberman) saying
that the alternative to thinking he was *dissembling* would be too bad to think about. It seems to me that, either way you slice it, it doesn't make Bush look good. Either Bush decided on his own, without much decisive interaction from his staff or Rumsfeld is lying about it in order to make himself look bad and inconsequential because the truth about Bush is worse then making himself look like a jackass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. No one had to ask Rummy
Edited on Thu Apr-29-04 08:32 PM by Gman
He was the one of several saying why we had to invade Iraq. Why would there have been a reason to ask him? "Oh, Rummy, I know you've been pushing invading Iraq like a spoiled brat kid that wants to open a couple of presents on Christmas Eve, but just in case anyone were to ask later, do you think we should go to war in Iraq or not?"

Of course no one asked him. I have no doubt whatsoever Rummy's telling the truth and nothing but the truth on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Dissembling
Interesting- so, at least in my mind, I see a process where one gathers with one's cabinet, even when each opinion is known, to get a final *sign-off*, so to speak. That's the difference. Bush plunged ahead because he already knew how everyone felt (as they knew his through his *body language*), so he saw no necessity to have any type of gathering of the cabinet for a meeting consensus to discuss the launch.

Unfortunately, Rumsfeld sees this, perhaps, as a show of how strong a leader Bush is, rather than a sign of weakness, impulsivity, and being a lone-ranger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotdiggitydog Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. WOW. Scarborough on MSNBC....
Joe Scarborough is STUNNED by the fact that Dumbsfeld wasn't asked about whether we should go to war with Iraq. Joe is suggesting that * "isn't intellectually curious".

This could be a major issue. Bush didn't consult Powell (who had lead a friggin war in Iraq before), and he didn't consult his Sec. of Defense. What the heck was Chimpy thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Looks like Bush only consulted those he knew would be all-out supporters.
We know how he hates to be crossed. Maybe he just didn't want to hear _any_ questions or reservations, even if they were just tactical ones (whicha re the onlyl onees Rumy was likely to ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC