Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Ashcroft's DoJ tie hands of FBI, making 9/11 possible???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:07 PM
Original message
Did Ashcroft's DoJ tie hands of FBI, making 9/11 possible???
If local Wisconsin FBI officials would have been given a warrant (FISA) to check the 21st hijacker's (Z. Moussaoui) computer, would they have discovered the 9/11 plot weeks before planes dove into the World Trade Towers???? Is the blame directly attributable to policies created by Ashcroft?

Easy to read w/ hotlinks, I repost this item we all contributed to over a year ago (Follow the FISA), in the hopes a Commission staffer might be interested in suggesting a new line of inquiry:



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x45821
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do You Mind If I Spread This?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Please do
A number of sites mirrored this story originally (as they did the Halliburton and Harkengate files).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Sweet
Good work my American comrade!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ya know Skip, if the "hair on fire" warnings were known when the...
Edited on Fri Apr-23-04 06:19 PM by Junkdrawer
Rowley memo came out, the Lehey committee would have had a much harder time explaining away that and the Phoenix memos. As it is, the administration relies on the fact that two years separate the leaks and that only a few will put one and one together.

And add to that the fact that two known al Qaeda members were allowed to roam the country free, and I don't see how at least a Players Got Played scenario isn't seriously discussed anywhere but here and a few other websites.

However, I'm told that in Europe, things are different...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's hard to place ALL the blame for 911 ...
on one cause ...

Watching Frontline's "The Man Who Knew" last night, I was struck by Louis Freeh's and Tom Pickard's naive ignorance of the danger of Al Qaeda and OBL ... Their collective antagonism of John O'Neill and O'Neill's claim that Al Qaeda and OBL had a considerable network of co-operatives in the US was quite disturbing ...

MUCH of their mistreatment of O'Neill occurred prior to 2001 ...

I am dumbfounded by their wrong-headed interference with critical investigations of potentially dangerous enemies: all because they didnt like his style ....

The behaviour of Amb. Barbara Bodine was particularly reprehensible ... She AND Freeh worked hard to stifle the NY office and undercut O'Neill, which left the US anti-terrorism effort woefully underpowered and understaffed .... and without an Al Qaeda specialist when they (we) needed them most ... (Except, of course, for Richard Clarke, who was emasculated by the WH ... ) ....

We have to admit ; lots of blame can be placed on Freeh and others before the Bush WH came to power ... But Ashcroft's and the Bush WH's malfeasance in the face of disaster was the icing on the cake ....

ALL they wanted was for everyone to just shut up about Al Qaeda already ...

I also was reminded of one event: the threat from the WH to the Taliban about 'carpets of gold' and 'carpets of bombs' .... it was early August when that supposedly occurred; which is about the same time that the primaries involved; Clarke, O'Neill and CIA, began to notice a 'change in the chatter' ... O'Neill AND Clarke knew it was coming .... Yet they were marginalized ....

Pretty fuckin sad .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC