Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bremer Feb26-01: * Admin No Attention Terrorism-will say OMG

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:26 PM
Original message
Bremer Feb26-01: * Admin No Attention Terrorism-will say OMG
http://www.chicagoreader.com/hottype/index.html

<snip>

On February 26, 2001, the Robert R. McCormick Tribune Foundation opened a three-day conference on the theme "Terrorism: Informing the Public" at Cantigny, the colonel's estate in Wheaton. Bremer, who gave the keynote speech, recalled his work on the National Commission on Terrorism.

"We concluded that the general terrorist threat is increasing," Bremer said, "particularly because of a change in the motives of terrorist groups. . . . We have seen a move from narrow political motivation to a broader ideological, religious, or apocalyptic motive for many terrorist groups -- groups that are not attacking because they are trying to find a broader audience, but are acting out of revenge or hatred, or simply out of an apocalyptic belief that the end of the world is near." The new terrorists, he said, weren't interested in killing just enough innocent people to get noticed. For them it was the more dead the better.

The Bush administration had been in power just about a month at this point, but Bremer had already seen enough to draw some conclusions about it. He told the many journalists invited to the Cantigny conference to hold the White House's feet to the fire: "It is the media's responsibility, and an important one, though very uncomfortable for people in government, to put a very strong spotlight on the government's policies and practices on terrorism, especially given the current disorganization of the federal government's fight against terrorism. In this area, the federal government is in complete disarray. There's been remarkably little attention to the major recommendation the Gilmore Commission made for a substantial reorganization of the government's approach to terrorism. Journalists shouldn't let politicians get away with that.

"The new administration seems to be paying no attention to the problem of terrorism. What they will do is stagger along until there's a major incident and then suddenly say, 'Oh, my God, shouldn't we be organized to deal with this?' That's too bad. They've been given a window of opportunity with very little terrorism now, and they're not taking advantage of it. Maybe the folks in the press ought to be pushing a little bit."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow
Pretty damning. Thanks for the link!

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Maybe the folks in the press ought to be pushing..."
dream on, Bremer... dream on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. enough said:
"The new administration seems to be paying no attention to the problem of terrorism. What they will do is stagger along until there's a major incident and then suddenly say, 'Oh, my God, shouldn't we be organized to deal with this?' "

Yeah but Clinton didn't do anything against terrorism, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Oh but he did. Did you read Richard Clarke's book ?
Have you heard of the Hart- Rudman report ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. .
Well, I think that terrorism was a top priority issue for Clinton, it just wasn't politicised like it's done by the Repubs after 911.
That's why the Right says Clinton didn't do anything.
The truth is that the Bush Admin seemed to do close to nothing against terrorism and 911 is the result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow - what a catch!!
Send this to Senator Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. I found a link for the publication...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. So Bremer didn't become an idiot until later?
What happened? He have a stroke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MO_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Maybe the promise
of becoming temporary king of Iraq was enough to silence him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. He was assimulated
by the Borg.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Major kick - for an unbelievable find!!
Let's hear BushCo try to spin this sucker!

:puke:

:argh:

Wake the FUCK up, wouldja America??!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Has anyone sent this too AAR? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. .
That would make a nice snippet in a Kerry Ad as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Wow...
...I suspect that one of those assassination attempts on Bremer in the near future will succeed if this gets any press at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is the first I have heard of the Gilmore Commission
http://www.rand.org/nsrd/terrpanel/terror2.pdf

It is very interesting. On Dec 15th 2000 the second report was issued and it was very explicet on what needed doing and what dangers could be expected. Bush* did none of those things and in fact fought against forming a Homeland Security for quite some time even after 9-11. It said Terrorism was an extremely urgent matter and Bush* ignored it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. Whoa There Mr. Viceroy!
Wow....that's something!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC