|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:39 AM Original message |
The Air America injunction request. There really IS a problem?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. they stopped payment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:44 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. that's not what i understood... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:11 AM Original message |
they stopped payment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
2. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Really? What page do you read that on?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:00 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. The mention is on page 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:05 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Not really... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
32. They don't talk about the details |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:23 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. No... "unless they are committing purjury" .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:42 AM Response to Reply #34 |
40. They are withholding payment pending arbitration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:45 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Sure... put it in an escrow account or something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:49 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. They are in arbitration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:52 AM Response to Reply #45 |
48. No. If they are in "arbitration" then they would deserve relief on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
3. the guy who owns the two stations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:54 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Really??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeSpeechCrusader (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:59 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. some posts on the subject yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:03 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. No, we know he donated to W, Lazio and others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:12 AM Response to Reply #17 |
30. It's not a "try" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtb33 (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:37 AM Response to Reply #30 |
59. You're right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
5. From what I hear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lindsay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
6. I believe the point is that there is no dispute about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:52 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. There could be a dispute, it may not be seperate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:03 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Maybe they will take up the CA contract dispute in CA court? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:14 AM Response to Reply #18 |
31. Agreed... "but" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:48 AM Response to Reply #31 |
43. Many contracts have "choice of law" provisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:09 AM Response to Reply #11 |
24. right of offset is not a given :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:21 AM Response to Reply #24 |
33. Oh, I absolutely agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:31 AM Response to Reply #11 |
37. That might be part of Mr, Lius's argument, however... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:39 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Right... The point of the post is... why isn't there even a REQUEST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
7. The injunction.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoctorMyEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
9. On Majority Report last night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:49 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. That makes sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Because it's irrelevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 08:56 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. See number eleven above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:05 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. I think the CA contract dispute will be handled in CA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:11 AM Response to Reply #20 |
29. The parent company is in New York |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oc2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:08 AM Response to Reply #14 |
22. I think the lesson for Air America to learn is ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
47. Devil's advocate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:55 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Then he should've put that in the contract. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:00 AM Response to Reply #49 |
52. I did not read the petition for injuction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
19. There are TWO SEPERATE CONTRACTS.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:09 AM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Lawyers are PAID for that stuff. Are you SURE this makes a difference?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papaooni (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
23. Story in Baltimore Sun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senjutsu (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
25. I am not a lawyer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:11 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. In a nutshell that's it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rooboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
27. This is a very simple case... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:26 AM Response to Reply #27 |
35. That's what I was trying to say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:26 AM Response to Reply #27 |
36. The problem with that is basically the point of this thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:36 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. WRONG!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:42 AM Response to Reply #38 |
41. You don't happen to feel strongly about this so you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:49 AM Response to Reply #41 |
46. Chicago is the slam dunk case legally, as I said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:58 AM Response to Reply #46 |
51. "Wrong" with it? No. There's nothing "wrong" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:03 AM Response to Reply #51 |
54. AAR is in court today requesting a hearing FOR TODAY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:05 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. In California? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:12 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. In NY cuz I assume they did the contracts in NY cuz they both have offices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:22 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. OK. Let's go back to post #1... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:24 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. OK, your second line really has nothing to do with what I'm trying to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:48 AM Response to Reply #36 |
44. matter of legal remedies: arbitration for main problem, injunction only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:02 AM Original message |
Assuming the CA contract is similar... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:02 AM Response to Reply #44 |
53. Sorry... double post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
50. "The Sludge Report" (AAR Website) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leanings (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
60. Reading this thread brings Shakespeare to mind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:46 AM Response to Reply #60 |
61. The context is that when they wanted to establish a dictatorship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC