Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: WH to let Condi testify under oath!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:00 AM
Original message
BREAKING: WH to let Condi testify under oath!
No link yet. Just heard the news on NBC4. (Washington, DC)

Mods, please lock if this is a dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. So, they destroyed all evidence and created a good blocker story
Took them longer than normal. Must have been a lot there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. bush and cheney will also testify
in front of the entire commission in private. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal72 Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Its on Faux New's website
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Man, they got that story up fast...
Have they got someone standing over the keyboard or what?

Makes me wonder if someone did give Faux a heads-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. CNN's Dana Bash reporting same
... if (IF?) everyone else agrees."

IF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. that's good news---but why is the WH knuckling so fast?
I thought it'd drag on for another week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. because they really are scared?
perhaps?
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. got the story and cover ready and supporting documents and videos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Because they think Condi can BS better than anyone
It's been kinda funny, all these Bushistas saying Condi should testify cuz they think she'll win the day while Condi is actually smart enough to know she can't. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kimber Scott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. Here's a link.
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0330911panel30-ON.html

White House to let Rice testify before 9/11 panel
Associated Press
Mar. 30, 2004 08:10 AM


WASHINGTON - National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice will be allowed to testify in public under oath before the commission investigating the failure to prevent the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, an administration official said Tuesday.

The official said the decision is conditioned on the Bush administration receiving assurances in writing from the commission that such a step does not set a precedent, said the official speaking on condition of anonymity. It appeared the administration already had such assurances verbally in private and is confident it get them in writing.

There was no ironclad legal doctrine buttressing Rice's refusal to testify publicly before the panel, law experts said Monday.

Rice already has spoken to the commission in private. But she said public testimony is protected by executive privilege. That principle says presidential advisers cannot be legally forced to disclose their confidential communications if that would adversely affect the operations of the executive branch.

It is rare for White House advisers to testify publicly before Congress or congressionally appointed panels like the Sept. 11 commission. But exceptions exist, and legal scholars say they poke holes in Rice's argument.

-more-

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0330911panel30-ON.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC