Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Public Record: Bush Ignored Terrorism Before 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 02:48 PM
Original message
Public Record: Bush Ignored Terrorism Before 9/11
===============================
THE DAILY MIS-LEAD
< http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24515 >
===============================

PUBLIC RECORD: BUSH IGNORED TERRORISM BEFORE 9/11

In the face of Richard Clarke's well-documented testimony to the 9/11
commission yesterday, the White House is continuing to say that it made
counterterrorism its top priority upon coming into office in January 2001.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan, echoing similar comments from top
Administration officials, said that "this Administration made going after Al
Qaida a top priority from very early on" in the face of increased terror
warnings before 9/11 (1). But, according to the public record, the
Administration made counterterrorism such a "top priority" that it never
once convened its task force on counterterrorism before 9/11, attempted to
downgrade counterterrorism at the Justice Department, and held only two out
of more than one hundred national security meetings on the issue of
terrorism. Meanwhile, the White House was cutting key counterterrorism
programs -- Bush himself admitted that he "didn't feel the sense of
urgency" about terrorism before 9/11 (2).

According to the Washington Post, President Bush and Vice President Cheney
never once convened the counterterrorism task force that was established in
May 2001 (3) -- despite repeated warnings that Al Qaida could be planning to
hijack airplanes and use them as missiles. This negligence came at roughly
the same time that the Vice President held at least 10 meetings of his
Energy Task Force (4) and attended at least six meetings with Enron
executives (5).

Similarly, Newsweek reported that internal government documents show that,
before 9/11, the Bush Administration moved to "de-emphasize"
counterterrorism (6). When the "FBI officials sought to add hundreds more
counterintelligence agents" to deal with the problem, "they got shot down"
by the White House.

Additionally, the Associated Press reported in 2002 that "President Bush's
national security leadership met formally nearly 100 times in the months
prior to the Sept. 11 attacks yet terrorism was the topic during only two of
those sessions." This is consistent with evidence Clarke has presented
showing that his January 2001 "urgent" memo asking for a meeting of top
officials on the imminent Al Qaida threat was rejected for almost eight
months (7). At the time, the White House said that they simply "did not need
to have a formal meeting to discuss the threat" (8).

Finally, the White House threatened to veto efforts putting more money into
counterterrorism (9), tried to cut funding for counterterrorism grants (10),
delayed arming the unmanned airplanes (11) that had spotted bin Laden in
Afghanistan, and terminated "a highly classified program to monitor Al Qaida
suspects in the United States (12).

Sources:
1. Press Briefing Scott McClellan, 03/22/2004,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24516.
2. The George W. Bush Presidency: An Early Assessment, 2003,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24517.
3. Statement by the President, 05/08/2001,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24518.
4. Process Used to Develop the National Energy Policy, US General Accounting
Office,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24519.
5. "Cheney: We Met With Enron Execs", ABC News, 01/09/2002,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24520.
6. Freedom of Information Center, 05/27/2002,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24521.
7. "Clarke's Take On Terror", CBS News, 03/21/2004,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24522.
8. "White House Rebuttal to Clarke Interview", Washington Post, 03/22/2004,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24523.
9. Freedom of Information Center, 05/27/2002,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24521.
10. "FBI Budget Squeezed After 9/11", Washington Post, 03/22/2004,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24524.
11. "Officials: U.S. missed chance to kill bin Laden", Helena Independent
Record, 06/25/2003,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24525.
12. "In the Months Before 9/11, Justice Department Curtailed Highly
Classified Program to Monitor Al Qaeda Suspects in the U.S.", PR Newswire,
03/21/2004, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24526.

Visit Misleader.org for more about Bush Administration distortion. -->
< http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1140667&l=24527 >
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey now, you know you are not supposed to look behind that
curtain.

Thanks for all the neat links.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, how come Dubya said he was not "on point"....
in the Bob Woodward book that interviewed him? Who is telling the truth? Somebody is lying. Maybe it's Bob Woodward?? We need to clear up this little "discrepancy"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's great.
Thanks for sharing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. well this is key for me....
hope they bring this up in April to the DOJ...

, attempted to
downgrade counterterrorism at the Justice Department, and held only two out
of more than one hundred national security meetings on the issue of
terrorism. Meanwhile, the White House was cutting key counterterrorism
programs -- Bush himself admitted that he "didn't feel the sense of
urgency" about terrorism before 9/11 (2).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Excellent, thank you for the post.
Also, never forget: Bush* was on vacation for the entire month of August 2001
(during the time they now say they were at "battle stations."

On second thought, I suppose they thought it would be easier to get something done with him out of the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beloved Citizen Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush was on vacation before 9/11
According to this 8/7/01 article in The Washington Post Bush's vacation rate going into Labor Day of that year was 42%.

How could Bush have done something about terrorism that summer? He was out playing golf.

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/2001/wpost080701.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So was Ashcroft. So was Cheney. They all were hiding
because they knew something big was coming.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC