Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the Media Sitting on a Secret to 9/11 and Iraq??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:55 AM
Original message
Is the Media Sitting on a Secret to 9/11 and Iraq??
I want to run something by you that's been praying on my mind since 9/11 because our media has in it's archives a real clue about both 9/11 and Iraq.

Remember in the 2000 campaign how the media was trying to paint Bush as a "shucks, good old boy"?? Numerous media, both print and tv, did identical stories (they have a way of all doing the same thing) regarding Bush's governing style as Gov. of Texas. They said all reports to him, regardless of how important the subject, had to be no longer that 1 page or he couldn't get through them and would lose interest. Likewise meetings, regardless of how important the subject, had to be less than 15 minutes or he wouldn't listen (his staff screened people for this before they were allowed into the office). This is also where the media talked about his short work day ending late afternoon with exercise workouts in the morning; his going to bed at 9:00; his leaving every weekend and his numerous long vacations. Now fast forward.

We know that even after something as shocking as 9/11 and the launching of war in Iraq, that Bush still kept his 'schedule' of exercise, short day at office, bedtime at 9, leaving every damn weekend and his long vacations. Thus, wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that the length and thus detail of reports given to him and length of meetings also did not change??? In a word, as the media and committees try to figure out what went wrong on 9/11, isn't a lot of the answer sitting in the media archieves regarding Bush?? If this is how he stays "informed" then al-Qaeda could have written him a letter with their plans and he would have missed it. The root of all of this goes right back to how uninformed, dumb and lazy Bush was from the get go----a perfect fool for others to use to forward their agendas. Bush was clueless and still remains so. I remember Congressmen being distressed about his "breakfast" meetings where all he was concerned about is the way the people were dressed and then just sat there and didn't interact with them nor participate in the "meeting". Anyway, this is a story the media needs to drag out of its archives as a backdrop to the 9/11 Commission and ask just how lame was this guy on the job??---certainly not what is needed in work ethic from a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. I remember those early media posts well
wonder why it ll changed? Excellent post. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes..it's the.....
PDB's! Gorelick is hte only Commissioner to have read the Aug 6,2001 PDB(President's Daily Briefing). She said it would "set your hair on fire". That sounds pretty hot to me. Of course, they will have to twist the arms off Bush and Cheney before anyone else gets to see them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartass Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. They're sitting on many secrets. Here's a big one!
An interpreter intercepted some pre-9/11 precepts concerning all kinds of terror threats to the U.S. which was ignored by *. Including airplane and other threats. She wants to go public but Ashcroft has threatened to put her in jail. I forgot where I saw this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmayer Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. I think what you're looking for is here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Good thing there are at least 3 more 911 Commission hearings...
...scheduled. This translator you've mentioned (Sibel Edmonds) could become the next Richard Clarke, only three weeks from now. She's already been on 60 Minutes.

Infiltration of the FBI's translation department by foreign spies surely belongs on the agenda for a 9-11 Commission hearings on "Law Enforcement and the Intelligence Community", to be held starting April 13th. See the discussion at http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1284889
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good catch...
Certainly so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptainClark23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good angle
And can be used well in tandem with dubya's 2001 summer vacation when all these things were coming to a head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. They encouraged ALL the staff
not to work late hours too. Probably so as not to show up Bush but also so the junior partners wouldn't be getting too much into certain things the lazy boys wanted to control on the QT. This was a open fact in a Times or Newsweek article, part of the family man charm offensive, Bush's new "style" before his polls went south and the body count went up.

Very few know who was doing the real work of planning etc. a la Cheney's Energy Commission and equally vaporous national security review. I guess that is the cover to minimize the damage. believing they were doing little when in fact they have been manipulating a lot. But is not as good as Reagan's natural amnesia, only more powerfully protected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well, no way Rove and staff could do all the dirty work they've done
by not working late...guess he does a lot of it in bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. Over and over on these threads I've mentioned suits
they promised they would wear suits in the WH or was it the Oval Room. Can anyone assess the evil they have perpetuated with their suits on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. One more...my theory is that some group within the cabal selected him
for the candidacy (and his ultimate 'crowning' with the aid of the Supreme Court). They did it thinking that the back slapping, phoney southern cowboy crap would go over with voters. He agreed on his conditions -that he woud not have to give up his video game playing time, that he would have ample time to rake brush, work on his bod, sleep, not have to be bothered with too many details (as you write) tell his awful jokes and then laugh at himself in a snorting-jumpking jack style, and be allowed to take revenge on all perceived enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC