Clarification on McLelland

[SavageWombat]

If I read Altercation correctly, Scott Mclelland (sp?) testified that Bush did not sign plans demanding the invasion of Iraq? Does this not clearly, and blatantly, constitute perjury? And is the press going to let this one slide too?

[displacedtexan]

1. Are you referring to this?

March 24, 2004 | 1:30 PM ET

David Sirota of the Progress Report picked up on the fact that Scott McClellan yesterday went in front of the cameras and tried to deliberately mislead the entire White House press corps. In this interchange, McClellan categorically denied that the President signed a directive in October of 2001 ordering the Pentagon to prepare plans for an Iraq invasion immediately after 9/11. What he did not say was that:

According to the 1/12/03 Washington Post (which quotes senior Administration officials) "six days after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush signed a 2½-page document marked 'TOP SECRET'" that "directed the Pentagon to begin planning military options for an invasion of Iraq." This is corroborated by 9/4/02 CBS News report that five hours after the 9/11 attacks, "Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was telling his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq."

more...

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3449870/