author/source:Reuters
published:Thu 11-Mar-2004
posted on this site:Fri 12-Mar-2004
Article Type : News
"Oil has historically been a cause of coups and conflicts in the region. It does bring out the worst in people"
Johannesburg - Oil should have brought wealth and development to bitterly poor West Africa, but instead it has fueled wars, coup plots and even mercenary intrigue. Equatorial Guinea, an oil producer on the Atlantic coast, this week arrested what it called an advance party of 15 mercenaries, saying "enemy powers" and multinational companies had been plotting against the tiny state. Two thousand miles away, Zimbabwe threatened to execute some 60 suspected mercenaries who authorities said had been on their way to Equatorial Guinea to join the plot. Harare has accused U.S., British and Spanish spy agencies of involvement in the alleged plot that could have been straight out of a Frederick Forsyth bestseller. In Forsyth's novel ``The Dogs of War'' it was the discovery of platinum riches in a remote African country that attracted an army of ruthless mercenaries. In West Africa, it is oil. The region is increasingly important to the United States as it seeks to reduce dependence on Middle East supplies, and Washington keeps close watch as governments rise and fall
http://www.zwnews.com/issuefull.cfm?ArticleID=8832Chad Says 43 Militants Killed in Fighting
Friday March 12, 2004 7:31 AM
By ABAKAR SALEH
Associated Press Writer
N'DJAMENA, Chad (AP) - The Chadian army clashed with Islamic militants near the country's western border with Niger and 43 militants and three soldiers were killed during two days of fighting, the government said Friday.
The militants belonged to the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat, an Algerian Islamic militant group that is believed to have ties to al-Qaida, Chad's Information Minister Moukhtar Wawa Dahab said....
The United States is helping to train and equip security forces in Chad, Niger and two other Saharan nations to better guard their porous borders against terrorists and arms trafficking.
But a U.S. defense official, speaking Thursday in Washington on condition of anonymity, said no American forces took part in the fighting in Chad.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-3851873,00.html FG to Call Bids for Chad Basin Oil Blocs
This Day (Lagos)
March 12, 2004
Posted to the web March 12, 2004
Mike Oduniyi And Mustapha Mohammed
Maiduguri
Kupolokun: Oil search in north gulps $374m
The Federal Government will early 2005 call for bids from local and international companies for the award of oil blocs in the Borno sector of the Chad Basin, in a bid to actualise hydrocarbon exploration and production north of the country.
The Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) has however announced that the search for crude oil in the Borno Basin in the past 28 years gulped a total sum of $374 million.
NNPC Group Managing Director, Engineer Funso Kupolokun, who announced the government's renewed oil exploration efforts in the Chad Basin yesterday, said results coming out from the integrated studies currently being carried out by a consortium of oil services companies, indicated "prospect for oil more than before
http://allafrica.com/stories/200403120510.html The Business of War: Making a Killing
From The Center for Public Integrity, 28 October 2002
By the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists
2. Privatizing Combat, the New World Order
In 1998, unbeknownst to most Americans, the United States had a military presence in a remote African war that drew little attention from the media. Unlike other U.S. interventions in Somalia, Bosnia, Haiti and Kosovo, there was no hand-wringing over whether a deployment was justified by U.S. national interests, whether troops would be spread too thin, whether American men and women should be put in harm’s way in a fight that had little to do with Main Street America, or whether the level of barbarity justified, on its own merits, the deployment of U.S. troops on humanitarian grounds.
The conflict in Sierra Leone, in which the rebels of the Revolutionary United Front displayed a ghastly predilection for amputating the limbs and noses of their victims, could certainly compete with the horrors of “ethnic cleansing” in Bosnia and Kosovo and the man-made famine engineered by warlords in Somalia. In November 1998, the RUF was in the middle of an orgy of looting, murder and decapitation, an operation codenamed “No Living Thing.” There was international intervention aimed at stopping the bloodshed. Sierra Leone’s demoralized and under-equipped national army was bolstered by Nigerian troops – flying the colors of the West African peacekeeping force, ECOMOG – and a handful of South African mercenaries in helicopter gunships who made constant forays into the battle zones to attack the RUF. In Freetown, the country’s capital, two large transport helicopters circled in the air, backing up the Nigerian troops. Painted on their fuselages were American flags.
This small U.S. contribution to defending Sierra Leone was not conducted by an elite unit of the Army, Navy or Marines, but by a private, Oregon-based company, International Charter Incorporated of Oregon (ICI), managed in part by former U.S. Special Forces operatives. ICI is one of several companies contracted by the State Department to go into danger zones that are too risky or unsavory to commit conventional U.S. forces. It also has been active in conflicts in Haiti and Liberia. ICI’s role in Sierra Leone was to back up the Nigerian troops, providing transport and medical evacuation services. The hot combat, as one former ICI employee explained to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, was left to the South African mercenaries. But ICI personnel inevitably and often were shot at and forced to return fire, according to team members interviewed by ICIJ, a right these sources claimed was explicitly extended to ICI in a letter from then-U.S. ambassador to Sierra Leone, Joseph Melrose. The State Department did not respond to requests for comment by telephone or through the Freedom of Information Act on whether such a letter was issued. ICI refused to respond to a number of questions put to the company on several occasions.
The United States had little real interest in Sierra Leone itself. U.S. involvement was driven by the fear that the instability and anarchy caused by the RUF and its sponsor, Liberian President Charles Taylor, would prove a danger to Washington’s ally Nigeria, an oil-rich nation that is the fifth largest supplier of crude to the United States. For ICI, the mission to Freetown was business, but it also advanced U.S. foreign policy. ICI’s deployment is part of a global trend of military outsourcing and foreign policy by proxy that has become far more common since the end of the Cold War. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the nature of international conflict shifted from U.S.-Soviet competition in client states to regional and ethnic conflicts requiring peacekeeping or other engagement. At the same time, the end of Cold War resulted in reduced superpower defense budgets, forcing even high-ranking military officers to sell their talents in the public sector. This collision of supply and demand resulted in a new age of military and security services on the world market.
In fact, a nearly two-year investigation by ICIJ identified at least 90 private military companies, or PMCs (as some of these new millennium mercenaries prefer to be known), that have operated in 110 countries worldwide. Most of these companies – defined as providing services normally carried out by a national military force, including military training, intelligence, logistics, combat and security in conflict zones – are headquartered in the United States, Britain and South Africa, though the vast bulk of their services are performed in conflict-ridden countries in Africa, South America and Asia. Eleven of the companies identified by ICIJ are no longer active, and the operational status of 18 others could not be determined.....
The strong links between the U.S. government and many of the private military companies that contract with them has presented questions regarding the revolving door between government and the private sector. In 1992, the Pentagon, then headed by Defense Secretary Dick Cheney, paid Brown & Root Services $3.9 million to produce a classified report detailing how private companies could help provide logistics for American troops in potential war zones. Later in 1992, the Pentagon gave Brown & Root an additional $5 million to update the report. Brown & Root (now called Kellogg Brown & Root, or KBR) is a subsidiary of Halliburton Corporation, which Cheney, the U.S. vice president, headed as CEO from 1995 to 1999. Brown & Root was also awarded contracts in 1995 and 1997 to provide logistical support in the Balkans, where the U.S. military has been enforcing the 1995 Dayton Peace accord that ended the war in former Yugoslavia. Those contracts mushroomed to $2.2 billion worth of payments over five years, according to the General Accounting Office, the investigative arm of Congress.
http://www.zwnews.com/warbusiness.doc 
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
