Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zilch. Nada. Zero. Private. Sector. Jobs. Created. Last. Month. WTF.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:07 PM
Original message
Zilch. Nada. Zero. Private. Sector. Jobs. Created. Last. Month. WTF.
Edited on Sat Mar-06-04 11:07 PM by TruthIsAll
Sit down. Take a breath. Not ONE private sector job created last month. The paltry 21,000 new jobs were Government jobs. That's right.

But CNBC won't tell you this. Move along. Nothing here. We have a booming economy. Expanding. Good for earnings. Good for stocks.

True. But. Bad for people.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040305/ts_nm/economy_dc_41

Job Growth Anemic in February
Fri Mar 5, 4:40 PM ET
By Tim Ahmann

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy added a paltry 21,000 jobs last month, according to a surprisingly weak government report on Friday that turned up the heat on President Bush (news - web sites) as he seeks re-election.

The February jobs report from the Labor Department (news - web sites) was the latest in a string that had fallen far short of expectations, dashing hopes employment would soon turn decisively higher.

"The job market is stuck in a cycle of inertia," said John Challenger, head of the outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. "The fact is, we are going to have to get used to slow job creation in this country."


The details in the report were uniformly bleak. Private-sector employment showed no gains. Government hiring was the only reason the nonfarm payroll count rose.

In addition, job creation in December and January was weaker than previously thought, by a combined 23,000 jobs.

And while the unemployment rate held steady at 5.6 percent, that was only because many people stopped looking for work. Employment as measured by a survey of households plummeted.

more...sadly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. 21000 people being hired to spy on Americans....
or do some other un-American activity.
Sorry, these aren't the "good" government jobs either... Its all part
of the so-called "Homeland Security" bs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. No, Bush Hired 21,000 Campaign Staffers (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I AM SPARTACUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. not "created no new jobs"...LOST more jobs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ah yes, its those "small government" republicans at work again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush better hurry on that...
...economic report recommendation and get those hamburger engineering jobs reclassified as manufacturing jobs before the November election don't cha think....
:tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat:::tinfoilhat:::tinfoilhat:::tinfoilhat:::tinfoilhat:::tinfoilhat:::tinfoilhat:::tinfoilhat:::tinfoilhat:::tinfoilhat:::tinfoilhat:::tinfoilhat:
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yawn, Wake Me When They Post The Revision
:boring: :boring: :boring: :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. What's also criminal is the failure to extend unemployment benefits.
Wasn't the "improving" economy one of the reasons they gave for not extending the benefits? It's disgusting to leave people with no jobs AND no money to pay for food and shelter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crachet2004 Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It would increase the 'official' unemployment rate by at least...
2 tenths of a percent, which would make Bushco look even worse on jobs. 5.6 to at least 5.8.

Cynical and, I agree, even 'criminal'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. What's wrong with us?
must be we are not trying..the *moron is working sooooo hard.

:shrug:
dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC