Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark as SecDef?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mgarretson Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 09:11 AM
Original message
Clark as SecDef?
Hey Clarkies,
Can any of you cite the legislation that saws General Clark can not serve as SecDef until he's been out of the service for 10 years? I know it's pretty widely accepted here but I've never seen anything to confirm it and I brought it up to some non-Duers and they didn't believe me, so I told them I'd check it out.

Thanks,
Mike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have no idea
And quite frankly, it doesn't matter. None of us are making this decision anyway. If he's eligible, I'm quite certain he'll be considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mgarretson Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I didn't ask if it matter... :)
Edited on Thu Mar-04-04 04:20 PM by mgarretson
Sirjwtheblack,
I didn't ask whether or not it matters... I was just wondering about the legality of it. :)

Does anyone know?

Best,
Mike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sure. Let the GOP Senate have fun turning him down...Bobby Ray Inman
flashback

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/confirmationcontrove
rsies.html
http://tinyurl.com/2479c



Bobby Ray Inman (1994)
Nominated as Defense Secretary
Bobby Ray Inman, a former admiral in the Navy, withdrew his
nomination as defense secretary in January 1994, apparently concerned
about inquiries into his past business dealings. At a news conference
announcing his decision, Inman accused his critics of
practicing "modern McCarthyism."

Admiral Inman was a stellar officer, with a LONG record of
distinguished public service. Sound familiar?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. if i'm not mistaken
Clark hasn't been a civilian long enough to be eligible as Sec. of Def.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here you go with the proof
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. that particular link
Edited on Thu Mar-04-04 06:02 PM by Dookus
discusses the position of Deputy Secretary of Defense.

on edit:

HERE is the link for Secretary of Defense. Yes, there is a 10 year period between active duty and service as SecDef:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/113.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thanks, here's the sec def link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Absolutely!
He would be like an HONEST Colon Foul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think he would be
perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Change the law!! Ahhhnold says it's okay!!
Clark would be superb!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think he has more to offer as Sec of State,
even if the SecDef prohibition weren't there.

I know Holbrooke is also contending, but he could do a lot as Amb to UN, which will play a large role in putting the planet back together after it is rescued from Shrub's play-pen.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mgarretson Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks for the links everyone.
DU, :yourock:

Best,
Mike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC