Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's first ads invoke Sept. 11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:14 PM
Original message
Bush's first ads invoke Sept. 11
Bush's first ads invoke Sept. 11

WASHINGTON - President George W. Bush’s re-election team unveiled his first campaign advertisements on Wednesday and they in part use the events of Sept. 11, 2001, to focus on his “steady leadership” during turbulent times.

The Bush-Cheney ’04 campaign waited to launch the ad campaign until after the Democrats chose their presumptive nominee, John Kerry, who locked it up with impressive victories across the country on Tuesday.

Campaign officials said they saw Kerry, a Massachusetts senator, as a formidable opponent and predicted Bush will be at most tied or behind in the polls until the Republican nominating convention in New York in September. Recent polls have put Bush behind his Democratic opponent.

more...

Bush's first ads invoke Sept. 11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. The WH's stonewalling and obstructing associated with 9-11 deserve
mention in every opposing ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Gardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. And the Saudi Family that Flew Home After 9/11
I don't think this is mentioned enough. Members of the Saudi family were allowed to leave the country right after 9/11, no questions asked. Nobody else could leave or fly anywhere. A lot of people who are still on the fence about who to vote for don't know about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. Time to let the families
be on one ad in opposition..hang them now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnyankee2601 Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. "predicted Bush will be at most tied or behind"
Setting the bar low already.

Let's see how fast he "catches up" after the mass demonstrations in New York in September. And if we don't have any, we deserve him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. If the e-voting isn't carefully monitored
If the e-voting isn't carefully monitored, a close race is just what Bush needs to pull off another election theft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnyankee2601 Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. This needn't be a close election.
Bush is a miserable failure. If this is pointed out louly in New York, and he uses the military to quiet the demonstrations, he will lose in a landslide.

Don't look at their dirty tricks as a threat. Look at them as opportunities to shine a light on the evil of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. You are right of course
Thanks.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. If we have them,
what makes you think the press will cover them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. For Fuck's Sake.
They always invoke 9/11 to get what they want. To instill fear in the American people. Yet they shy away from trying to figure out what really happened that lead up to 9/11. It is despicable and offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Do they not really know what happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's just offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. The nerve of him using the tragedy of 9/11 for his political gain.
Especially since he has blood on his hands. Shame on you georgie!
Methinks that this will make me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. I laughed at the first one---it was so pathetic!
Edited on Wed Mar-03-04 04:23 PM by slinkerwink
The third one was sending me all the wrong messages because I remembered that Bush hadn't caught Osama bin laden, and that we're still in a shitty economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gold_bug Donating Member (485 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. They are pathetic.
A lot of stuff sucks now but you should vote for me because I'm a strong leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Law of diminishing returns
dictates that sooner or later, dancing on the grave of 3,000 murder victims is going to backfire on these ghouls. I hope it's sooner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Keep dredging up your failures, George...
...it's a winning strategery, for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. If we had competent leadership...
the 9/11 attacks may never have occurred. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. Keep milking, George, keep milking!
Sooner or later that cow's going to kick, and it won't be pretty when she does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Nice that they used the Septmeber 11 images,
too bad they left out the part about Bush flying around the country for hours, in his words, "..trying to stay out of harm's way." Dependable strong leadership, my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. Don't forget,
he continued with the reading lesson even after hearing of the second attack. He never was in any danger, otherwise they would have yanked his butt out of that classroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
strategery blunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. "Steady leadership?" I don't think so
<snip>
“The last few years have tested America in many ways,” the voice-over says. “Some challenges we’ve seen before. And some were like no others. But America rose to the challenge.”

Umm...what about the challenge of protecting our civil liberties? Bush didn't rise to that one, and that would have been unique in American history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. LOL! they FAIL to mention his catastrophic FAILURE on 9.11...
and his apparent collusion in allowing it to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratreformed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. An this is a surprise??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. This image should be on everyone's mind when they think Bush 9-11



or this one:



or this one:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CalebHayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. Shocking... lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
22. Oh lordy , this pisses me off
I can't just imagine how it makes the victims families feel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. "Tested" - And Failed that Test - SHAME!!!
Edited on Wed Mar-03-04 05:25 PM by Stephanie
Two ads refer to the tragedy of Sept. 11, 2001, as the Bush campaign seeks to present Bush as a tried and tested leader who has risen to the challenge. One ad, entitled “Tested,” shows, among other images, a damaged building from the World Trade Center ruins behind an American flag.

That he would prance on the graves of the 3000 he failed to defend sickens me like nothing else. Will he wear his phony pilot costume?

Just what exactly is he BOASTING about? He is guilty of EXTREME COWARDICE in FLEEING Washington when he was told of the impending attacks by al Queda.

Someone needs to ask Bush about the relationship between his politically risky decision to spend a full MONTH on vacation in August 2001, and the dire WARNINGS about imminent terrorist attacks that arose at just that time.

Bush is a COWARD. Bush is a FRAUD. Bush BETRAYED his oath to protect and defend.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

July 16, 2001: British spy agencies send a report to British Prime Minister Tony Blair and other top officials warning that al-Qaeda is in "the final stages" of preparing a terrorist attack in the West. The prediction is "based on intelligence gleaned not just from MI6 and GCHQ but also from US agencies, including the CIA and the National Security Agency," which cooperate with the British. "The contents of the July 16 warning would have been passed to the Americans, Whitehall sources confirmed." The report states there is "an acute awareness" that the attack is "a very serious threat." This information could be from or in addition to a warning based on surveillance of al-Qaeda prisoner Khalid al-Fawwaz (see August 21, 2001).

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/main/timelinebefore911.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<snip>

Some sources who have read the still-secret congressional report say some sections would not play quite so neatly into White House plans. One portion deals extensively with the stream of U.S. intelligence-agency reports in the summer of 2001 suggesting that Al Qaeda was planning an upcoming attack against the United States—and implicitly raises questions about how Bush and his top aides responded. One such CIA briefing, in July 2001, was particularly chilling and prophetic. It predicted that Osama bin Laden was about to launch a terrorist strike “in the coming weeks,” the congressional investigators found. The intelligence briefing went on to say: “The attack will be spectacular and designed to inflict mass casualties against U.S. facilities or interests. Attack preparations have been made. Attack will occur with little or no warning.”

The substance of that intelligence report was first disclosed at a public hearing last September by staff director Hill. But at the last minute, Hill was blocked from saying precisely who within the Bush White House got the briefing when CIA director Tenet classified the names of the recipients. (One source says the recipients of the briefing included Bush himself.) As a result, Hill was only able to say the briefing was given to “senior government officials.”

www.msnbc.com/news/907379.asp?0cv=KA01

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Summer Spinning
To GOP, Vacation Boosted Bush Agenda; To Democrats, Voters See a Shirk Ethic
Aug 29, 2001

<snip>

Democratic officials were delighted to turn on their televisions this month and see late-night comedians, night after night and week after week, using Bush's "working vacation" as a running gag that competed for time with the troubles of Rep. Gary Condit (D-Calif.). David Letterman, who cracked that Bush's vacation will end Jan. 20, 2005, asked one night, "Unwind? When the hell does this guy wind? Come on."

The president will leave his ranch here Thursday morning and fly back to Washington to face a sagging economy, a tight budget and a Senate that does not seem inclined to give him many more trophies to go with his tax cut. Officials in both parties agree that depending on which images of his month out of Washington wind up sticking with voters, Bush either will have more leverage for the battles ahead, or will be hobbled by fresh doubts about his command of the job. "Everything depends on whether he is seen as taking charge when there's something to take charge of," said Richard E. Neustadt, a presidential scholar at Harvard University. "But there is a view of Bush that he's a total lightweight. This makes it an easy shot, so it was a risk for him."

The White House had announced that Bush would stay at his 1,600-acre ranch in Crawford from Aug. 4 through Labor Day on Sept. 3, a 31-day stretch that would have broken a modern record for a presidential vacation, held by Richard M. Nixon for a 30-day trip to San Clemente, Calif., in 1969. News reports played up the record, and a Gallup Poll found that 55 percent of respondents thought Bush's vacation was too long.

The length of the trip revived old questions about Bush's work ethic, and the poll and the news coverage caused consternation in the White House. Aides said they had planned an ambitious schedule for Bush as long ago as late June, but reporters were not told about it, even after they landed here. The White House, suddenly defensive, took every opportunity to show Bush on the go and even created a "Western White House" logo for the briefing room at Crawford Elementary School. Bush revealed that his ranch had new video conferencing equipment for keeping in touch with his national security team.

<more>

www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A15957-2001

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Tell us the TRUTH about your August 2001 month-long "vacation", Mr. Bush. And Dick Cheney, tell us why you too left DC for the ENTIRE month of August. Tell us why John Ashcroft stopped flying commercial in July 2001 due to a "threat assessment."

BUSH KNEW, and Bush DID NOTHING to protect New York. He only worried about HIMSELF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. That's disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TEXASYANKEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. Tasteless
Just like everything else this misAdministration has done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
28. Bush is such foul filth.
With their blood on his hands Bush desecrates the memories of the victims of his greed and incompetence while proclaiming his own magnificance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC