Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The problem is growing geometrically..." Say WHUT?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 07:38 AM
Original message
"The problem is growing geometrically..." Say WHUT?
Teaser for an "All Things Considered" segment on computer hacking this evening. They had a sound bite from some law-enforcement type saying "The problem is growing GEOMETRICALLY..."

You don't suppose he really wanted to say "exponentially", do you?

Yogi Beara does it, it's cute, Some cop spokesman says it on network radio, and nobody catches it, that's SAD....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe he meant geometrically
Edited on Wed Mar-03-04 07:44 AM by truthspeaker
I think his understanding of the mathematical terms might be greater than yours. I'd explain it, but all I remember is geometric growth is faster than linear growth but slower than exponential growth. 11th grade was a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
priller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't think I've ever heard of growing "geometrically" before
I mean, you can have a linear growth chart, or you can have your line curving upwards (exponential), but what's a geometric line?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Compounded bank interest (fixed rate)
Edited on Wed Mar-03-04 08:06 AM by Art_from_Ark
would be an example of geometric growth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SerpentX Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. They meant exponential.
"Trigonometric growth" might make a little sense, if you were describing an oscillating function, but you wouldn't actually call it that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. a valid mathematical term
an 'arithmetic' series is n, n+m, n+2m, n+3m, etc.
eg 4,6,8,10,12,14,...
a 'geometric' series is a, a*r, a*r*r, a*r*r*r, ...
eg 4,8,16,32,64,...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SerpentX Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. When was the last time you used the term "arithmatic growth"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Probably when discussing Malthus
see http://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/jmorrow/malthus.html . Malthus wasn't actually right about food production growing only arithmetically, but the contrast between arithmetic and geometric growth can be seen in his theory.

Another possibility, as a poster above said, is when discussing bank interest. If you leave your interest in your savings account, you get geometric growth; if you transfer it to a checking account with no interest, you get arithmetic growth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. support EDUCATION!!!
in American public schools
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. You have to think in terms of cyberspace
nodes, networks, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Geometric growth is a valid mathematical term
http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache:B_DzDP8-ALcJ:www-biology.ucsd.edu/classes/bieb102.WI04/BIEB102/Lecture4.pdf+%22geometric+growth%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

Geometric growth -> Discrete measurement of time
Exponential growth -> Continuous measurement of time

Since the police would be doing measurements on a period basis (incidents per week or per month, or something similar), they would be using discrete measurement of time; hence, geometric growth is accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, but
It doesn't have to do with the measurement- it has to do with the 'event' and whether it occurs discretely (like a coin flip) or continuously (like heat transfer through a wall).

Events that are discrete can be modelled as continuous if the resolution is high enough, i.e. there are many events in a given period of time.

Population growth is discrete, but since there are so many of us, and we 'breed' and die so frequently, exponential growth is an acceptable model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Not really
Edited on Wed Mar-03-04 10:13 AM by kiahzero
If you are determining continuous growth, you're integrating with respect to t, time, rather than x, or count, or whatever your dependant variable is. It is the time that is continuous, not the event.

A quote from the paper that I sourced above (I would have preferred a site talking about exponential growth and geometric growth, but you cope with what you've got):

Population biologists trying to predict future population growth take different approaches to the mathematics. The first approach, "discrete time", as the name suggests, divides time into discrete chunks or intervals and forms equations that describe the growth of the population from one time interval to the next. This method produces equations for population growth called difference equations; an example is the opening equation of this chapter. The other approach considers time as a continuous variable and uses the calculus of differential equations to perform smooth continuous projections over time.

On Edit: One other thing - the events we're discussing here are discrete. If you were to look at a detailed graph of hacking attempts over time, it would be discontinuous - periods with dx/dt = 0 when there are no attempts, and a moment where dx/dt is undefined when the actual attempt is logged. Hence, you have lots of little straight lines that aren't attached to one another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I am confused
Are you agreeing with me?

Note: If you need references, I don't know of any on the web, but I have lots of non-electronic sources. Books I am currently using for class:

"Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis (2nd Ed.)"
- John Rice

"Stochastic Processes (2nd. Ed)"
- Sheldon M. Ross

The second one is a bit wonky, but Ross has another book out that goes more into detail (I don't have that one).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Somewhat agreeing with you
My point was this:
You could do it that way, but it makes more sense to integrate / sum over time, since that's the independant variable.

If we do it your way, it's still discrete, since the events are not continuous.

So, either way, it's still geometric growth. As for the sources, I'm really not that interest. Comp. Sci gives me all the stupid number theory crap that I'll ever need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. Hey, everybody!
So what are the chances of somebody from the FBI who got put on a "Cyber-Crime Task Force" knowing enough mathematics to diferentiate between "Geometric" and "Exponential" growth?

I say slim and none, and the guy was guilty of a "Yogi-ism".

Now I'm feeling like an uneducated boob for not knowing more geometry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. I think it is actually geometric growth.
Like the old shampoo commercial, except instead of telling two friends about the shampoo, you're telling two friends about g3n3r1c v1a8ra, which you can't even spell right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC