(Washington, D.C.) A Senate sub committee Wednesday will hear testimony about the implications of judicial decisions supporting same-sex marriage. The hearing, set up by Sen. John Cornyn's (R-Texas) the chair of the subcommittee, is officially titled "Judicial Activism vs. Democracy: What are the National Implications of the Massachusetts Goodridge Decision and the Judicial Invalidation of Traditional Marriage Laws?"
Cornyn has a lengthy history of opposing gay rights initiatives, was critical of the US Supreme Court decision that overturned the Texas sodomy law, and condemned the Massachusetts Supreme Court for ruling in favor of gay marriage.
"To discuss 'judicial activism' in this way is offensive. It is a way to attack judges who demonstrate courage and principle in matters of civil rights. The same was said of Chief Justice Earl Warren when he wrote the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. the Board of Education. What we take for granted to day as clearly the right decision was derided in its time as 'judicial activism.' "
But just who are these 'activist' judges? Lambda Legal has just complete a lengthy study of recent court rulings that favored gays.
Six of the seven justices on the Massachusetts high court that recently ruled gay couples have the right to marry were appointed by Republican governors.
Republican presidents appointed four of the six U.S. Supreme Court justices who voted to strike down Texas's law banning gay couples from having sex.
Finish the story:
http://www.365gay.com/newscon04/03/030204activistJudges.htm