Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Marine war resister, acquitted of desertion, jailed for AWOL, now freed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 02:52 AM
Original message
Marine war resister, acquitted of desertion, jailed for AWOL, now freed
http://www.notinourname.net/funk/

"March 1, 2004

After spending nearly six months in the military brig at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, Stephen has returned to the San Francisco Bay Area and has been speaking out against the ongoing occupation--and the ongoing military recruiting efforts required to fight these wars."

Bay area celebrations planned (see link).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. If he was such a conscientious objector
Why did he join the military in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pay for college, one weekend a month...
Could have something to do with the fact that he was a reservist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He could've gotten more money working at a fast-food restaurant
Than the military pays a reservist.

It's fine to be a conscientious objector. What I find questionable is those people who suddenly find out they are one when they discover that they may have to fulfill the obligations of the contract they sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yup, You sign up to defend your country
and when the BFEE orders you into a war of agression the "honorable" thing is to just go along. If Calley tells you to slaughter the villagers at My Lai, the "honorable" thing is to follow orders and kill babies. Yeah, right. Maybe in your world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Nice strawman
Kill babies. Very original.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. "kill babies"
Not a strawman. This vile and cowardly attack on Iraq was a war crime. Refusing to participate requires both a high level of understanding and a conscience. 99% of those ordered into this war have the latter, but lack the former. This guy was in the tiny minority who had both. Your "just follow your orders" BS is just a contemporary variant of the fascist talking points that were put on trial at Nuremberg.

As for the baby-killing "strawman" (Warning: graphic images):
http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm
http://www.robert-fisk.com/the_evidence.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Fascist talking points eh?
"Refusing to participate requires both a high level of understanding and a conscience. 99% of those ordered into this war have the latter, but lack the former."

Really? Did you take a survey? I'm interested to see your stats.

"Your "just follow your orders" BS is just a contemporary variant of the fascist talking points that were put on trial at Nuremberg."

Hmm... I never said anything about following orders... wonder if this is another strawman? Yup, guess so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Quite a few...
military members either reconsider their views on war, or end up seeing the military as not for "defense" but less wholesome adventures.

Even during WWII, and moreso during Vitnam and even Gulf I, there were people in uniform who chose to resist actual action that they saw as immoral, and there is a mechanism for these people to either be reassigned to noncomabat units or receive a discharge.

Early Quakers in Britain, btw, who preached nonviolence and refused to fight in wars, found the barracks of King James' armies to be among their most fertile recruiting grounds.

Now that we have a smaller all-volunteer military, these actions are far less common, and most of the organizations working with them have folded. The only major one working with them now is Quaker House, which backed Stephen Funk.

Are they questioned as being disloyal, cowards, or stupid for signing up in the first place? Of course these questions are raised, but the answers are not so simple. Each individual has a different story, and quick judgments by people who don't know them should be avoided.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Thanks for your response
Every case is indeed different and from looking at some of the articles posted on the website cited, it seems that this person was given fair, due process. Many others who conscientiously objected were not even prosecuted. This Marine chose not to show up instead of declaring CO status and it was this charge that he was convicted on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The "well he should just follow orders" schtick doesn't fly

sometimes the ugly truth rears it's head and people
have a change of heart.
It takes alot of guts to sit in the brig for moral reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Could it be that he had no idea an insane administration would
attempt world domination? That he had no idea that the bush* admin. would mistreat the military so badly? No rational fairly-informed person would imagine that the US would lie to go to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC