Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I wonder what O'Really has to say about Rush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 10:38 AM
Original message
I wonder what O'Really has to say about Rush
check out http://www.foxnews.com/access/video.html and look to the Views section where Billy O'Really has a talking points tiff about "The progressive community sends a clear signal: If we don't like a law, we are not going to obey it".

(uh, Rush didn't seem to like the law so he didn't obey it... Uh, Bill is on a network that shows mostly degenerate filth and yet he'll host TV specials showing how the media affects children... what a fucking scumbag...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onebigbadwulf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's called Salutary Neglect Bill - it's the reason we had a revolution
Maybe Bill would rather live in a monarchy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Given UK's status as a monarchy, there's often a moment when
I wish I was living there instead.

They seem to have more freedom than we do in the US. Greater freedom of speech, greater array of tv shows that don't pander to idiocy so the few media owners can bathe in the revenue generated... oh yeah, Tony "Dickless" Blair is trying to nix all that because the media spoke out against him. What a fucking little coward he is... :eyes: Bush should be so lucky that the media rolls over and barks on his request.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gentlemen Start Your Mouths...
O'Reilly is covering his ass big time these days. That chickenshit "appology" on GMA that really wasn't, was to cover him when the media turns on those who will be viewed as supporting a very unpopular war. O'Reilly's saavy enough to know that...also that if * loses, he now can cover by saying how he also was critical..."speaking up for the little guy" <gag>

O'Reilly also sees Rush's end coming soon. I keep saying the day Rush's indictment is read in court and his drug use goes from "rumor" to legal proceeding, all the Roy Blacks in the world isn't going to save his sorry hemeroidal draft dodge. We'll learn what taking so many drugs a day can do to a person and how he went to great lengths to acquire and purchase drugs illegally...it'll be too much for even the most braindead ditto-head to ignore. O'Reilly already has a radio show in Rush's time slot and would love to suck up affiliates not comfy with Oxyboy. He's holding his powder now, but that comes to an end real soon.

Also...the fun for us "media watchers" will be a rivalry between O'Reilly and Hannity who feels he's Rush's heir. These two massive egos have co-existed as they were on the Faux "us vs. the liberal media" shtick and its rise in the ratings. Radio's another story...as they're on competing networks. Also waiting in the wings is Tony Snow and Ollie North...also with radio network deals. This could be fun...hate radio heads directing their hate at one another. It's inevitable. Enjoy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Projection is the stock in trade of Totalitarian Scum everywhere
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 11:02 AM by tom_paine
Hey O'Recihley! Why don't you tell us what plans "the Liberaks" have for stealing the 2004 "election"?

Why do these Bootlicking Propagandists waste their projections by telling us what we already KNOW they are.

Yes, we know Busheviks are not bound by the rule of law. Neither are you, O'Reichley but thanks for projection what is already obvious about yourself onto others...

Now, back to those "Liberal" pland for the 2004 "election" theft. My guess is the "liberal" are going to use Diebold Touchscreen voting (made by "liberal" campaign donors) and augmented by manual disenfranchsiement methodologies pioneered by "Liberals" in 2000 and 2002.

Like Stalin accusing the Soviet dissidents of criminal activity or Nazis accusing Jews of violent behavior are our homegrown Totalitarian Bootlickers like O'Reichley.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks for posting the pic, I love the look on his face...
Looks like he's constipated, managed to let it loose, but then it shoved itself back up his rear... :evilgrin:

The sadness of the republican empire...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC