Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tell me a Republican didn't write this...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Arbustosux Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 02:35 PM
Original message
Tell me a Republican didn't write this...
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 02:42 PM by Arbustosux
go to the link and read the quote of the day:

http://abcnews.go.com/

now tell me Rove didn't write this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. You mean this
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 02:44 PM by RobertSeattle
"Our enemy is growing stronger day after day, and its intelligence information increases. By God, this is suffocation."

— A document, believed to have been written by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi to senior al Qaeda leaders, asking for help in fomenting rebellion in Iraq


Apparently the DOD/White House isn't 100% sure this is authentic from what I've heard.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arbustosux Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thats the one...
It doesn't pass my smell test

I am shocked that it didn't come out and say it is all because of Bush the magnificent leader with great vision
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, that's awfully fishy sounding. Anyone have a link to the full text?
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 03:11 PM by Brotherjohn
Of this new alleged al-Zarqawi memo to Al Qaeda, that is?

Remember the memo allegedly from the head of Iraqi intel to Saddam which, in two measly paragraphs, admitted that Iraq:
- Sponsored Mohammed Atta for a visit to Iraq
- Put him up in noted terrorist Abu Nidal's house
- Trained him in terrorist techniques
- Directly supervised him (the memo made reference to this several times, just to make sure we knew)
- Expressed satisfaction that he was progressing well and would succeed in hitting the targets that Iraq had approved
- Admitted that Iraq had intercepted an unnamed shipment from Niger
- Said that this shipment was obtained with the help of Libya and Syria, and a small group "from the Al Qaeda organization"
- Pointed out that this all came to fruition thanks to a meeting between Hussein and the president of Syria

Boy, that was awfully convenient. It just validates the whole PNAC agenda in one, tiny little memo. Trouble is, it's also been widely debunked as a forgery, as if it's over-the-top obviousness didn't tell you that. The only thing that could have made it more obvious as a forgery would be if it closed with:
"Please DO NOT let this memo fall into the hands of the almighty American forces and their fearless leader, George W. Bush, or our entire evil scheme will be foiled" (insert visual equivalent, in Arabic characters, of the writer twisting his handlebar moustache and grinning) Please also notify our friends in France and at the U.N. that our plans are going according to schedule, and suggest to Ms. Clinton that she perhaps make sure she is not in Manhattan or Washington, D.C., on September the 11th."

Besides, if that memo were authentic, the administration would have at least mentioned it. Correction: they'd be shoving it in all our faces... and actually, rightfully so (IF it were real).

If this current al-Zarqawi memo to Al Qaeda has similarly obvious and ridiculously revealing language, I'd think it's likely a forgery, too. But I guess forces sympathetic to the Bush administration in Iraq are learning not to overreach so much, since at least this memo's premise is believable. We would expect U.S. enemies to attempt to come together in the face of attack.

But to sit there and praise the enemies' intelligence in the memo? That's where it starts to sound fishy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti-NAFTA Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's because the entire document is bogus
It was probably manufactured by CIA/Mossad agents, Rovian conspirators, or pro-US Iraqis.

The plan for fomenting rebellion is absolutely ridiculous considering the fact that Bush WANTS sectarian division to make way for the "stable and democratic" Chalabi associates for the elections. He basically is trying to divide the anti-American elements.

I don't see why Al Qaeda would do this (unless Al Qaeda itself is influenced by _________).

The flattering remarks on the US are evidence that the document is bullshit.

I'm sick of the news parading this as fact that America is working to prevent this type of sectarianism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatSlob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. A Republican didn't write this
Hey, you asked somebody to tell you that!:evilgrin:
I'm just acting on your request!:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. My guess is Achmed "Scooter" Libibi, chief of staff for Ahmed Chalabi.
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 03:48 PM by Brotherjohn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well, I thought it was funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC