"Dr." Kay, why should we believe ANYthing you say?

[buycitgo]

get this...was this ever mentioned during the media's fawning supplication to the oh so honorable "Dr.'s" hagio lap over the last few days.

June, 2003
Former U.N. weapons inspector David Kay told CNN on Saturday that though there was a "lack of strong evidence" that the vehicles had been used to produce deadly biological agents, "the most likely use" and "the most probable use" was to create biological weapons. He said suggestions that the mobile labs had some more benign application, such as producing agricultural chemicals, were unlikely.

have you seen ANYbody over the last few days bringing up this specious crap, parroting the warmongers' line, even AFTER the war?

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/06/07/cia.mobile.labs/

this is just the start

remember, Kay is NOT a scientist........a "political scientist," at best

[PVnRT]

1. Isn't it possible

that after having gone over there and seen things for himself, that he changed his mind? How is that a bad thing?

[asjr]

3. But he still

thinks he is protecting Shrub. I imagine the CIA is really pissed.

[buycitgo]

4. uhhhhhh, you haven't been keeping up at ALL

Kay is a bought and paid for SHILL for the admin.....he's in it up to his corrupt eyeballs....did you see him squalling all over the tube in the war run up?

shameless, cocksure ASSERTIONS of what we'd find when we went in, KNOWING that what he said was a LIE, cause he was THERE!

then, when he was appointed ISG head:

He constantly trumped up the possibility of finding weapons, then downgraded that to "programs," then records of programs, then claimed ONE test tube of botulinum was a WMD, then backtracked on it when he had no choice, ad infinitum

he finally was put in the position that he HAD to tell some of the truth.....mainly that there were NO WMDs there at all......NONE!

he KNEW this from 1998 on, when it became obvious that just about everything not destroyed in the early 90s was taken out by Clinton's bombing then.

whatever else was left could present ZERO threat to us, much less his neighbors, for several reasons: NO way to deliver them, and the fact that what he might have had was theater application, meaning it was like the stuff they used in WWI, and needed to be used in MASSIVE quantities to be effective. Also, shelf life for almost all of these weapons would preclude their current existence. No facilities for current production in even minute quantities were found then, or when we went in.

to TOP it off, why in the world wouldn't ISRAEL have done something about these so-called WMDs?????

THEY're the ones under most threat, and they sure as hell have no compunction about going in and doing what's necessary

nice try, though

[lovedems]

2. I question this...

His job wasn't to actually to gather the intelligence was it? That would make him an agent and he isn't. I am assuming he only saw the intelligence after it was gathered and made his assessments. Didn't he just look at the photos or the paperwork to determine the scope of the WMD program or what a particular chemical might be an ingredient for? How would he necessarily know if there was pressure? It's not like he sat in those meetings when The Dick went to the CIA.

I just don't get what makes him an expert at intelligence gathering and how much he was privvy to while it was being gathered.

[buycitgo]

5. you, too, don't know what's what

He ADMITTED to being a SPY, in his own words, when he was an inspector

I've linked the Gordon Prather/Kay story from either worldnut or newshax, via Jude Wanniski

you can google it

he's a PAID shill; has been for some time

do some homework before you say stuff like that, please

[buycitgo]

6. how COULD I have forgotten the BEST part?

from the same article.....can you BELIEVE somebody didn't ask him to justify THIS crap with what he's been saying?

did Levin/Kennedy have this:

Kay said he was aware of a number of theories that the vehicles might have had other uses, "none of which make any logical sense."

Kay saw one of the vehicles on a recent trip to Iraq and received reports on the second.

Kay said most of the alternative uses that have been suggested "didn't pass the laugh test."

"The silliest one," Kay said, was the suggestion that they had been designed to generate hydrogen for meteorological balloons.

anyone else come across this?