Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Bush going to go to invade Iraq no matter what?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:32 PM
Original message
Poll question: Was Bush going to go to invade Iraq no matter what?
Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 01:42 PM by BullGooseLoony
BEFORE the war, did you think that Bush was dead set on invading Iraq no matter what?

Edited for error on choice 3 and to capitalize "before."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep
They have oil and Saddam threatened his daddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cavebat2000 Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why lieberman isn't polling well
Democrats dont want this war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. read The Price of Loyalty
if you have ANY doubts.

it was the ONLY, the ONLY issue on the NSC table from day one of the * administration.

islamic terrorism wasn't considered seriously until *after* 9/11 and even then, neocons like Rummy and Wolfy stayed focused on Saddam/Iraq.

there was never a question of IF, only WHEN and HOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Right, but did you think BEFORE the war that he was going
to do it no matter what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I did
and just remember that, while everybody will probably vote for #1, most of those people will vote for the pink tutu's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think you know
where I'm going with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Yes
I knew before he was selected that Iraq would be on his menu as soon as he could lie his way into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kclown Donating Member (459 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Me too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. I indeed did! But I thought that since we had Saddam Hussein
contained and the UN inspectors in Iraq, that it wasn't going to happen.

I thought the U.S. would invent a situation. Guess, I was right, 'eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. Absolutely. Here's the way I felt
bush started talking tough about Iraq and Saddam as soon as he got into office. At the say time the political pundits were saying that bush had seen his father's ratings fall after the first Gulf War was over and that Jr wasn't going to make the same mistakes that his father did. I figured he'd find some excuse to invade Iraq so he could call himself a war-time president and maintain his power. I never dreamed he'd be as successful as he's been (at least in the eyes of the general public).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. as soon as I heard bush was running for President
I knew he'd start a war in Iraq .

Both my husband and I saw this coming from any republican
Administration .

The republican party is the War and Resession party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. It was evident from the moment the name Iraq was ever mentioned
by the the Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes, it was.
The second he started talking about Iraq we all knew what he was going to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Darn tooten
I felt that way after reading "shrub" by Molly Ivans. Or should I say listened (have the audio book), during the 2000 primaries. If you havent read it yet, take a look see. Count how many things have come to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. No assination attempt on poppy=no war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah, I had that sickening feeling. . .to prove he had bigger
balls than his Dad.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. 36-0-0-0-0
Is the score as of 12:45 cst. Goes to show the type of well informed people here at DU. I knew long before I knew DU existed, anyone who can read and heard about the PNAC knew. I told everyone I knew it was a done deal and they all thought I was a tinfoilhatter making up RW conspiracy theories about the PNAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. People with a critical eye knew.
Which, I assume, includes our party leadership, some of whom voted for the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. There was a great quote early on that made a funny comparison;
"If a country that was known to be the worlds leading consumer of potato chips and French fries started buying up all the land in Idaho and Oregon but SWORE that it wasn't interested in the potatoes, would we believe them?"

It is my opinion that Iraq was one of the reasons Bush was swept into office in the first place. Ask yourself this: Would John McCain have made a better president and was he or was he not a better Republican candidate than Shrub? McCain was a true war hero and i think he would have been MUCH more reserved about using military force than our current Nitwit In Chief. (I would have preferred Gore of course) This war on Iraq always was and always will be about control of the resources and market share. Just like EVERY WAR since the beginning of time.
The gullibility of the American people is astounding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. CHENEY decided to invade Iraq early. I don't know about Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Right...I suppose that it was the Bush administration
as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. He was also going to invade Afghanistan no matter what
The threat was made in July 2001. Invading Afghanistan had nothing whatsoever to do with "Terrorism". 'Kenny Boy' Lay desparately needed the pipeline for his failed energy company in India and Cheney promised to help him out. Plans had been on the table long before 9-11.

What a lucky break for them that 9-11 came along!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Hell yes,protests World wide didn't faze him and his regime....
Chimpboy was going in not matter what anyone said. The corporations demanded it and Bush complied.

500+ dead over 3,000 wounded,ahhhh so what...

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DjTj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. He would have gone even if the IWR failed
AND, they succeeded in making the IWR a wedge issue for Democrats.

Rove wins again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
24. War is essential to the BFEE's
survival with its incestuous relationship with the Military Industrial Complex and fossil fuels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
25. Without a doubt.
They had all this planned over ten years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
areschild Donating Member (952 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. Absolutely.
There was no doubt in my mind that these scumbags had already decided to invade Iraq, whatever it took.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
27. 2 OF YOU THINK BUSH GENUINELY TRIED DIPLOMACY ???
IDENTIFY YOURSELVES SO I CAN KICK YOUR NAIVE ASSES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Less than I expected
Slow day for the trolls, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Comedians
no doubt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. The results are closer than I anticipated.
Truly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
30. 'Saddam tried to
kill his daddy', nough said. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
32. There are a lot of liars in this thread
I was on DU when IWR was being debated, and a large portion of posters were quite clear that they did not know whether or not Saddam had WMD's. Many thought he did because WE SOLD THEM TO IRAQ!!!

Now, EVERYONE seems to have known Saddam had no WMD's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. That was not the question
The question was "did you know that Bush was going to invade Iraq." Yes we did and most of us knew there was no real threat from Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
33. It was a given
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
34. Family in Iraqi opposition groups
said it was a fact. It was the main reason for some for voting for * in the first place; rumors are that a promise of some sort was made to Ahmad Chalabi's group. 9/11 was like manna from heaven to this administration; gave them the excuse they needed to carry out what they had been planning long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
35. It was pretty clear to me that * and co. were hell-bent to start a war
with Iraq no matter what. In fact Bush acted just like a teenager who's desperate to do something, for a reason he can't reveal. Oil and oilmen's influence, sure, and the threat to switch to the Euro for payments, but I still halfway wonder if there isn't also an additional,secret reason that won't come out for a generation, if ever.

I think some of the Dem. congresscritters also knew that he'd go in with or without the IWR. If they voted for it with this knowledge, you can't really hold them responsible for the war and its casualties. They couldn't have changed things no matter how they voted.

As for the "chemical and biological weapons;" yeah, I thought it was possible Saddam had a small trove of them. That didn't change my belief that going into Iraq was wrong and crazy. After all, there was no evidence that he planned to use them on us now, or in the future, or was supplying them to anybody who would. And if you want to be literal, even tear gas and pepper spray are chemical weapons.

I was disappointed with the Dems who voted for the IWR, the more so since reportedly their calls and letters were running between 20 to 1 and 100 to 1 against it. Still, I think their reasoning may have been like the above, figuring it wouldn't make any practical difference anyway, and that a "yes" vote would take the issue off the table for the 2002 elections. Of course, it didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
36. On orders from PNAC.
www.newamericancentruy.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
37. Kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKHRANA Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
40. YEP, and the first Gulf War was attacked the same way too...
I read somewhere that prior to invading Kuwait, Saddam sent feelers to Bush to get approval to invade Kuwait and got it.

Once Saddam did, then Bush attacks him. Hmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC