Bush Pushes Plan to Permit Internet Surveillance

[ariellyn]

I'm just wondering whether Bush's infringement on the rest of America's privacy will also lead to the imprisonment of the BBV criminals stealing elections. Read on...


January 21, 2004
by Haider Rizvi

The Bush administration is pushing to ratify an international convention that civil libertarians say would pose serious threats to privacy rights at home and abroad.

After delaying for about two years, U.S. President George W. Bush recently asked the U.S. Senate to ratify the Council of Europe Cybercrime Convention, a global agreement apparently created to help police worldwide cooperate to fight Internet crimes.

"It's the only international treaty to address the problems of computer-related crime and electronic evidence gathering," Bush said in his November letter asking the Senate to confirm U.S. adherence to the treaty.

"It promises to be an effective tool in the global effort to combat computer-related crime," added the president.

But independent legal experts and right activists on both sides of the Atlantic are skeptical about such claims.

--snip--

The treaty criminalizes acts such as hacking and the production, sale or distribution of hacking tools, and expands criminal liability for intellectual property violations that nations must have on their books as crimes.

So far, only four countries – Albania, Estonia, Hungary and Croatia – have ratified the treaty since it opened for signatures in 2001.

Thirty-two countries besides the United States have signed the convention; it must be ratified by five nations before it enters into force.

The agreement also makes it mandatory for each participating nation to grant new powers of search and seizure to its law enforcement authorities, including the power to force an Internet service provider (ISP) to preserve a customer's usage records and to monitor his or her online activities as they occur.

If approved by the Senate, experts say, U.S. police would be required to cooperate in "mutual assistance requests" from police in other nations "to the widest extent possible."

--snip--

Right groups are also worried about the possible use of new surveillance devices like Carnivore, the "Internet-tapping" system used by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to intercept communications.

Unlike wiretaps, which are set up by a telephone company on behalf of authorities, Carnivore allows law enforcement agents direct access to entire ISP networks, far beyond the scope of powers those agents now have. When the U.S. Congress passed the infamous Patriot Act to boost law-enforcement in response to the Sep. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, it authorized the use of Carnivore for collecting information on Internet addresses and traffic. But it stopped short of permitting the system to be used to eavesdrop on actual content.

--snip--

"Unfortunately, the history of the FBI and other government agencies on respecting privacy is not good," says Steinhardt in an interview, explaining that is why, "Carnivore has been opposed by organisations from across the political spectrum''.

--snip--

Steinhardt wonders why Bush decided to request ratification now. "We are trying to understand why the U.S. government did not do anything two years ago," he says. "They had abandoned this (treaty). I think it's all related to 9/11. But it's a mystery to us."

In his letter to the Senate, Bush wrote, "the treaty would help deny 'safe havens' to criminals, including terrorists, who can cause damage to U.S. interests abroad using computer systems."

(Inter Press Service)

Source Link

http://antiwar.com/article.php?articleid=1748

[markus]

1. Just saw the junior looking aag on Newsnight

Compared it to a pen register (which in and of itself probably isn't too bad). Just tracking destinations, not content.

But, of course, that would required us to trush Bush and AshKKKroft. Which of course is insane.