Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Color of Bush's Sky (my SOTU report)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:32 AM
Original message
The Color of Bush's Sky (my SOTU report)
It took a little less than a half hour for George W. Bush to taint the 215th State of the Union address with a bald-faced lie about Iraq. It was, in the end, merely an accent in the symphony.

The nonsense began in this order: The economy is growing stronger. The tax cuts are working. Public schools are flourishing. The Patriot Act is excellent. Everything is rosy in Afghanistan. The people of Iraq are free. Throughout the vacuous peroration were more shooting-fish-in-a-barrel applause lines than has ever been heard in any major speech in American history. “I love God! I love soldiers! I love America! I love freedom!” went the drumbeat. Once upon a time, we had standards.

Let’s take a few of these in order.

· The Iraq lie came when Bush claimed that David Kay’s weapons inspection teams had found materials and equipment to construct weapons of mass destruction. In point of fact, Kay and his people found no such thing, just as the denigrated UNMOVIC inspectors likewise found no such thing. The promised 26,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin, 1,000,000 of sarin and mustard and VX nerve agent, the 30,000 munitions to deliver this stuff, the mobile biological weapons labs, and the uranium from Niger that so disgraced the last State of the Union speech Bush gave, somehow failed to turn up. Perhaps this failure is a matter of syntax. According to Bush, once again, we should be looking for ‘nucular’ materials. Maybe the inspectors just misread the package labels in Tikrit.

· Iraq is now free, and the only people killing American soldiers are lingering defenders of Saddam Hussein. In fact, most of the insurgents against the American occupation despise Hussein. They are nationalists defending their country against a force they see as usurpers. As for freedom, it is not nearly on the table. Shia, Sunni and Kurd tremble on the edge of explosive civil war, and the American administrators are using spit and baling wire to keep the lid on. Meanwhile, pipe dreams about a power transfer become less tenable by the hour.

· According to Bush, it is “condescending” to suggest that democracy can never take root in the Middle East. There are two bitterly amusing facets to this one. First, it is axiomatic that true democracy can never be brought anywhere effectively at the point of a gun without razing the existing society completely to the ground, as was done in Japan and Germany. If Bush had suggested we grind every aspect of culture and infrastructure to powder in the Middle East, a necessary aspect of the plan proposed, that particular bit of applause would have been muted. Second, the main reason why democracy will have a hard time in the Middle East is because it has been viciously repressed in places like Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia under the American direction of a number of people at the speech tonight – Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Perle specifically – while they worked in other administrations.

· Afghanistan is apparently a wonderland of freedom where the children are learning and all is well, according to Bush. The fact that the Taliban is reforming there in strength, that the warlords are once again dominant, that the opium industry is flourishing, that civilians continue to be killed by American bombs, and that women are again being oppressed, never made it into the speech. For the second year in a row, the name ‘Osama bin Laden’ went completely unmentioned.

· The tax cuts are working, and the economy is sound because of them. In fact, there are two million fewer jobs in America than when Bush took office. The tax cuts, which promised 300,000 new jobs a month, never reached a third of that goal. Whatever new jobs have been created pay far less than the ones which were lost. Bush demanded that Congress make the cuts permanent, apparently taking Karl Rove’s advice about “Sticking to principle.” The transcript of the meeting discussing the second round of tax cuts, revealed recently by former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, had Bush openly questioning the policy of giving government money to rich people again. In that meeting, he was basically shouted down by the people who purportedly work for him, and the cuts went through. It appears they won another argument about it, putting the Commander in Chief in his place.

· The math in this speech was pretty specious. Bush praised the No Child Left Behind bill, which he underfunded by $7 billion, and asked for a whole new program called ‘Jobs for the 21st Century.’ He wants to make the tax cuts permanent. He wants to spend federal money to shore up the energy grid. Simultaneously, he wants to continue to pour money into the occupation of Iraq, an action that has cost nearly $200 billion already. Yet he promised to cut the budget deficit in half within five years. Recent poll numbers suggest Bush will be in retirement in five years, however, so he won’t be around when the incredible inaccuracy of these numbers become apparent.

· Gambling Social Security in the stock market is back on the table. Never mind that his Enron buddies blew a wide hole in the markets a couple of years ago; had Social Security been invested in the markets then, it would have been completely gutted. That, perhaps, is the rub. When the stock market takes a beating, the money lost by investors doesn’t just disappear. It is adjusted upwards into the holdings of the richest 1% of investors, who have enough capital to survive a downturn and have money on hand to scoop up devalued stock on the chance it retains value later. This 1% owns a disproportionally massive majority of all the stocks traded on the markets. If Social Security cash is fed into the markets, it is ripe for the poaching. Besides, it rids Bush of the pesky need to provide seniors with safety-net funding better used by the Pentagon, Halliburton and other close friends.

· The sops thrown to the most extreme elements of the Republican party were many and varied. If children are to be taught sexual education, they must be taught only abstinence, because clearly teenagers will never have sex again and shouldn’t learn about protecting themselves from disease and unwanted pregnancies. The Massachusetts judges who decided, using the clear language of the law, that there is no aspect of the constitution denying same-sex marriages were attacked. Bush dismissed their decision as “arbitrary,” and threatened a constitutional amendment to defend marriage against the queer onslaught. His faith-based federal funding concept is back on the table again. Bush said that religious groups are denied federal money “because they have a cross, or a Star of David, or a crescent on the wall.” Actually, George, it’s because the separation of church and state is clearly outlined in the constitution you want to revise to keep gay people from enjoying the same human rights as straight people.

We could go on in this vein, but you get the idea. This speech was, in the immortal words of Hunter S. Thompson, a nest of gibberish. Columnist Paul Krugman of the New York Times holds the opinion that this was deliberate. “Karl Rove and other insiders must know all this,” wrote Krugman in a Tuesday editorial titled ‘Going for Broke.’ “So they must figure that once they have won the election, they will have such a complete lock on power that they can break many of their promises with impunity. What will they do with that lock on power? Their election strategy — confuse the middle, but feed the base — suggests the answer.”

The best moments in the speech came from a completely unexpected realm. Bush’s people salted the room with young soldiers resplendent in their uniforms. The cameras flashed to them every time Bush pledged his undying respect for them, and every time he said matters in Iraq are going famously well. The soldiers reacted with dead faces, muted clapping, and about as much enthusiasm as one might find in the waiting room outside a proctology clinic.

One soldier in particular, a young African American man, summed up the night. Bush was waxing rhapsodic about a letter he received from a ten year old girl named Ashley Pearson. Ashley, it seems, asked the Bush to tell the soldiers she loved them. As Bush slogged through the saccharine, the camera found this soldier. When Bush was done with Ashley, and the room rose yet again to applaud, he visibly rolled his eyes and laughed in obvious disgust, clapped once, and sat back down. The other soldiers with him showed no emotion whatsoever.

The troops know the score. Believe it. Hopefully, the American people do as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. You are right, we sure didn't get dazzled by brilliance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. No, per usual, we got baffled by bullsh*t.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for the post and the excellent essay.
I hope you can get this information out there beyond the choir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wish I could read this...
but I cannot stop crying long enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Granite Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is kind of what I expected our rebuttal to be
Great job. I just wish this message could have been delivered on TV immediately after Bush's* gag-fest SOTU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah, I'm sorry, but next to this
(actually, next to anything), our rebuttal sucked donkey balls.

Why do we always have to look like we're coming live from the VFW hall courtesy of the producers of Cable Access Channel 244? And why go with a poorly-read, canned response -- I seem to recall Pelosi mentioned something about "exploration", like she thought * was gonna mention Mars. :shrug:

Sorry about the rant. Nice job Will. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozvotros Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. More "Big Lie" Strategy
Bush has learned that he can lie with complete impunity and near immunity. The networks will trot out twice as many loud mouthed toadies as meek and mild detractors to proclaim him great and good and fearless. Daschle and Pelosi were exhibit A & B. No matter what they said, their delivery effectively hid their message. Our candidates are the only hope to get the real message out clearly. The networks will have to cover them for the next ten months. We need to hear from each of them what a total bullshit lie this whole address was tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. What Will said!
That's about the gist of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. I knew it!
Without even seeing an advance copy, I previewed the speech with great precision:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1037321

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks Will. I had to turn my back to the TV and DU while he spoke
I couldn't bear to see his smirk after the first few minutes. Thanks for sharing about the soldiers. As an ex-soldier that gives me hope.

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. Dead on, Will, as usual!
The only thing you missed was the part where I was throwing things at the TV (of course, that was all the way through)!!

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ariellyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
12. They just won't let the WMD lies go...it would have been better if
he had just left this information out. I, too, heard the vague reference to some findings in Iraq as a clip on the evening news. That they keep putting disinformation out like this is to their detriment IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. Parse their sentences - their lies are lawyerly
Look at the transcript before publication. There is squirming room there. For example, I think the David Kay stuff was more like "plans to acquire weapons of mass destruction programs." Wait for the transcript, then parse it. MFs. You're understanding of the gist of it may be disputable when they parse it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. I read it in the soldiers, too...
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 01:15 AM by Must_B_Free
"Fool me again, shame on me"

Noone is buying Bush's lies anymore...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. Thank You WilliamPitt
While I was wiping my dinner off of my television set, and thinking that every American should send Bush a urine sample first thing in the morning, you were busy writing something helpful. I am now printing out your SOTU report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. Lies, lies, and
more lies. The most evil and criminal elements ever to slither into the WH, yet all our Pravda can do is replay the edited Dean speech 24/7. :puke: Does anyone need a further clue WTF is wrong with our system. Government by the corporations, for the corporations and the People are lapping it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. Thanks for the rundown, Will!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
18. thanks for the recap
couldn't stand to sit for that crap. You're a stronger man than I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
19. Excellent analysis, Will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
20. Great post. Good points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
21. "Once upon a time we had standards"
That about sums up my feelings on last night's SOTU. All I could keep thinking was "this man couldn't find a coherent paragraph with both hands and a flashlight". I got really tired of the way his speechwriters just seemed to stitich sentences together in random fashion. No thought was connected to what came before or after it. I was almost like they put the few thoughts Shrub can keep in his head in a hat and drew them out one at a time to write the speech.

Very sad. Makes me long for the days of Clinton and his 2 and a half hour long SOTUs. :-) THey may have rambled. They may have drug into the next morning. But dammit at least he gave supporting information and the reasons behind what he wanted to do instead of just spewing a quick line clearly designed to get applause from the repukes and then moving on to the next poorly crafted soundbite.

I was sad and disgusted for the state of our democracy last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. Well done!
One of my most troubling moments in his speech was when he talked about "defending the sanctity" of marriage. Since when in this country was "sanctity" something we defended? We are a nation based on the rule of law, not sacred inviolability.

Well. We used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. but if he called it the 'holiness of marriage'
it would look like the state was making a law concerning religion. Could a Marriage Amendment actually be non-constitutional?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
24. The NY Times found Bush on top of Everest looking down on the Dems! ??

The New York Times ' Bumiller and Stevenson write that the president "presented the nation with a choice between his continued leadership and a return to the 'dangerous illusion' that the threat had ended." He used the word "war" at least 10 times and asserted, "Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better." strategy that balanced compassionate appeals to swing voters on issues like the economy, health care and education with other issues popular with the conservative base he wants to rally.

"The values we try to live by never change, and they are instilled in us by fundamental institutions, such as families and schools and religious congregations," Mr. Bush said, portraying himself as the national paterfamilias, fighting to protect the American way. "These institutions, these unseen pillars of civilization, must remain strong in America, and we will defend them."

Accordingly, he vowed to fight efforts by "activist judges" to define marriage as anything but the union of a man and a woman, and he called for new legislation barring discrimination in the awarding of federal grants and contracts to religion-based institutions that provide social services. He pledged a doubling of federal money for abstinence education in schools and modest new amounts for school drug testing "as a tool to save children's lives." Mr. Bush portrayed himself as the best defender of American interests, from tax cuts at home to terrorism abroad.

And he reminded his listeners, and his Democratic rivals, that he begins this election year conspicuously atop the political equivalent of Everest, while the men who would replace him are scrambling in the foothills of the White Mountains. Mr. Bush spoke like a man who is headed to the Moon and Mars, while the Democrats are headed to Manchester, N.H.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
25. Thanks for the assessment Will
Great job! :thumbsup

The SOTU is about what I expected: platitudes and lies. I didn't watch it because I just didn't want to deal with the effect on my blood pressure I knew was coming. Also, I simply can't stand the "nucular" habit.

It truly amazes me that conservatives are so willing to convince themselves of their rightness on such simply little utterances, as if they not only don't care but actually prefer incomplete thinking. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twenty3 Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. kick
get back up there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
27. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Room101 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
28. Kick
I printed it and will read it at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
29. despite the fact that all SOTU have too many applause lines....
I do agree with your dissection of the lies, manipulation, and language that is victim-oriented.

"You people may feel safe, but DON'T! The mean monsters are in your closet and you need tough daddy to fight your fights. Mommy government is no longer here in the household, so you'll have to make your own cereal for breakfast and cry yourself to sleep at night...but you are tough in your victimhood. You can deal with it."

I really can't stand to think very long about how depressing his rhetoric was. In the face of far-reaching, troubling economic issues for American families like health insurance, joblessness, and low wages, we get "Don't take steroids." "We will fund 'abstain from sex' programs in lieu of healthy education about condoms, etc.", and "Gays are not God's creatures, and we are willing to waste precious resources and legislative time on crafting an Amendment placing male/female marriage right up there with giving women the vote, trial by jury of peers, and equal protections for all."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
30. Nice piece Will
As usual you are over it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
31. well done mr pitt
and may i add -- it's frightening to me that social security and wall street are being brought back on the table.
what responsible politician would suggest such a thing after the markets performance of the last few years? it's outrageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
32. Nicely done, Will.

I was pleased to read the disgusted soldier, he feels
what I feel. (I was also pleased not to see the "I I I".)

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC