today's email said:
The notion that former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean is just a quirky, fringe candidate has largely been dispelled by his recent fund-raising success and by his strong showings in Iowa and New Hampshire polls. Still, many seem to think that Dean's appeal and support is largely confined to the antiwar and leftist wing of the party. But, while there is no question that Dean's presidential candidacy draws considerable support from both of those constituencies, his campaign is also tapping into a strong vein of disillusionment with the current leadership and direction of the Democratic Party.
Many Democrats believe that their party not only caved on attacking Iraq, but that it also backed the concept of an economic stimulus package based entirely on tax cuts -- as opposed to public works spending. There is frustration that many Democratic legislators are supporting a prescription drug benefit that 69 percent of seniors -- in a recent Gallup poll -- said would not be of much help to them. And there is a sense that elected Democratic leaders have been cowed by President Bush since the tragedy of Sept. 11, 2001, and have confined themselves largely to half-measures and rhetorical distinctions. <snip>
The rub is that while a candidate like Dean can certainly score points by venting Democrats' frustration and contempt for Bush, these views bear little resemblance to those of the independent and other swing voters who, by and large, determine who wins and loses in general elections. In those same two June Ipsos/Cook surveys, 55 percent of all independent registered voters approved of Bush's overall performance, while 25 percent strongly approved. Thirty-seven percent disapproved, but only 17 percent strongly disapproved. On the economy and domestic issues, a somewhat stronger case can be made for more specific attacks. On the economy, 44 percent of independent voters approved and 12 percent strongly approved -- while 49 percent disapproved, and 29 percent strongly disapproved. On the handling of domestic issues, 48 percent approved and only 8 percent strongly approved; 45 percent disapproved, with 30 percent strongly disapproving. On foreign policy, however, independents are generally supportive of Bush. Sixty percent of independents approved of Bush's performance and 38 percent strongly approved -- while 35 percent disapprove, with 21 percent strongly disapproving.
In short, exhibiting personal contempt and voicing broadside condemnations of Bush can generate considerable short-term enthusiasm within the Democratic Party, but it can easily be counterproductive among independent voters. The data does indicate that Democrats are on considerably safer ground with targeted attacks on Bush on both the economy and on domestic issues, with less downside potential among independents and presumably other swing voters. <snip>
... There is a considerable body of evidence that voters see a more direct connection between government spending on streets, highways, bridges and school construction and the creation of jobs than the connection between tax cuts and job creation and economic stimulus.
The Democrats' argument could have gone something like this: "President Bush wants to blow the deficit sky high by giving tax cuts to his rich and powerful friends. If we are going to drive up the deficit, at least do it by repairing our streets, roads, schools and other public spending that we would eventually need to do anyway and would create more jobs." It's a virtual certainty that this argument would resonate better than the tax cuts did -- which received tepid support at best.
************************************
Charlie Cook's "Off To The Races" is published each Tuesday
by National Journal Group Inc. For more information about
National Journal Group's publications, go to
http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/ 
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
