BushSR is a traitor to US Constitution via PNAC plan of occupation

[protect freedom impeach bush now]

Today's Quote :

"If you put everything into context, 'new American century,' as used by the elder Bush, did not mean a new century in America. What it meant, in simplest terms, is that the United States would dominate the world in the 21st century. And that's what the younger Bush is clearly striving for: world domination. The push for American dominance is why the younger Bush treats the United Nations with a contempt usually reserved by conservatives for the Berkeley City Council. To dominate, we can't cooperate with others; we must become a rogue nation. It looks to me like Daddy had his cohorts lay out the blueprint, then he put them in charge of Sonny. Sonny does what he's told. Even the scheme to destroy our social programs is straight out of Daddy's playbook. First, through ill-conceived tax cuts and reckless spending, you put the nation into debt. Then, lamenting a lack of funds, you abolish the programs. That's vintage Reagan-Bush. It's hard to tell now when the Bush family steamroller will finally be brought under control. When it is, I do hope the investigators took a good look at Daddy. He Da Man!

---- "Like Father, Like Son," in the San Francisco Chronicle,
Harley Sorenson, 21-Jul-03

[wontmoveon]

1. Which brings us to the 28 "classified" pages...

I have been wondering all day why this story sounds so phony to me. Why would the
administration go out of it's way to protect the Saudi family? After the Saudi official asked that
the pages be released because the Saudis had nothing to hide it even made me wonder more.
It just doesn't seem all that crucial to protect the Saudis...WHAT IS REALLY IN THOSE PAGES?
Here's my guess: those pages indeed reveal information that implicates a very close ally...and it
is not Saudi Arabia. If good investigation is done, the money trail will lead to the culprits. Culprits
who have the wherewithall to devise complicated schemes, to set up phony charities and make it
appear to be a Saudi channel to terrorists. What country in the ME would try to drive a wedge
between the Saudis and the US? Why would the Saudis risk what has kept them on top for over
60 years by actually funding terrorism against the US? Those highjackers were identified as
"Saudi nationals." What does that mean? It really means that they hold Saudi passports or
citizenship but they do not have to be Saudis by birth. Remember, Bin Laden is a Yeminite.
We already know that a fair number of the 9/11 highjackers used stolen identies so they really
didn't have to be Saudis at all.

Ask yourself...what country would be able to set it up to implicate the Saudis. What country has spent
countless US tax dollars, and used brutal military force to get its way in the ME. What country goes
out of its way to discredit every Arab nation that it can every chance that it gets?
Think about it people...the answer is not blowing in the wind!

[whoYaCallinAlib]

2. Give me an "I", give me an "S" . . .

Good analysis.

[JackSwift]

4. What not enough guts to make your Anti-Semitic smear

openly? Or not enough evidence? Or both? There is zero evidence that Israel had anything to do with 9/11, and it is disgusting to see it spewed here. This kind of prejudiced crap interferes with legitimate criticism of bad Israeli policies with respect to the Palestinians.

In fact, of the many countries to warn us about possible terrorist attacks prior to 9/11, Israel was one of them.

[wontmoveon]

5. No smear intended...just food for critical thought

Nothing should be off the table of questioning minds...I just lost a cousin in Iraq and no amount
of accusations are going to stop me from questioning anything I want to about this administration,
our allies, or our enemies.

[JackSwift]

3. Bush senior was a multilateralist

of the first order. It's one of the reasons the far right dislikes him. His "New World Order" was coalition stuff, the opposite of unilateralism. Sr. had his problems too, but he was far less dangerous.

[wontmoveon]

6. And your point is....?

Bush Sr. is....?
GW Bush is....?