Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sycophant Spies (to CIA - Support Bush or else)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 10:09 AM
Original message
Sycophant Spies (to CIA - Support Bush or else)

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-op-cia21nov21.story
Sycophant Spies (to CIA - Support Bush or else)
It's sad that an administration in desperate need of unsullied intelligence would rather agents shut up and salute
By David Wise
David Wise writes frequently about intelligence and is the author of "Spy: The Inside Story of How the FBI's Robert Hanssen Betrayed America."

November 21, 2004

AT LEAST now it's in the open. According to an astounding internal memo slipped to the press last week, Porter J. Goss, the new head of the CIA, expects his spies to "support the administration."

From time to time over the years, critics have accused the CIA of "politicizing" intelligence. The memo the CIA director sent to the agency's employees leaves no doubt. It tells the spies to get on the team, get with the program. The document left the impression that in the second Bush administration, the White House will run the CIA.

This marks the first time — as far as the public knows at least — that a CIA director, in writing, has ordered the agency's spies and analysts to back the president. Why does it matter? Because a president, in theory, relies on the CIA to present facts neutrally, honestly and objectively so that he can base his policies on accurate information. The CIA's analysts are not supposed to be cheerleaders.

Yet the Goss memo, leaked to the New York Times last week, tells the CIA's employees that their job is to "support the administration and its policies in our work," adding: "As agency employees we do not identify with, support or champion opposition to the administration or its policies." <snip>


One leaked national intelligence estimate predicted instability — or civil war — in Iraq through 2005. Two documents leaked in September — and written in January 2003, two months before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq — were more startling. One said that war would increase sympathy for terrorists throughout the Islamic world; another, right on the mark, warned of a possible insurgency after the war.
<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. How long before
one of the old CIA operatives says 'cheney it' and goes on the rampage?
How much damage could a cell of intel boyz and grrls do, when they put their minds to taking down the RICO-PNAC axis of evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC