Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Happens When Everyone Else Starts Using Drones?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 09:28 AM
Original message
What Happens When Everyone Else Starts Using Drones?
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/10/what-happens-when-everyone-else-starts-using-drones/43492/

The country is growing accustomed to debate about the use of drone aircraft in military surveillance and strikes. Should the U.S., as it has under President Barack Obama, be leaning more heavily on the use of the remote-controlled airplanes to hunt and kill terrorists — including American citizens?

In The New York Times this weekend, Scott Shane points to another debate about drones, one that is inevitable as other countries hurry to catch up to America in their development of the weapons. What should the U.S. do when another country starts to use drones the way it has in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and elsewhere?

Eventually, the United States will face a military adversary or terrorist group armed with drones, military analysts say. But what the short-run hazard experts foresee is not an attack on the United States, which faces no enemies with significant combat drone capabilities, but the political and legal challenges posed when another country follows the American example. The Bush administration, and even more aggressively the Obama administration, embraced an extraordinary principle: that the United States can send this robotic weapon over borders to kill perceived enemies, even American citizens, who are viewed as a threat.

“Is this the world we want to live in?” asks Micah Zenko, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. “Because we’re creating it.”

The challenge could be faced along any number of restive borders (in Kashmir, or in northern Mexico) or against breakaway elements within a country (the Uighurs in Xinjiang Province, in China, perhaps, or in Chechnya). And the United States won't be able to say much in protest without sounding hypocritical. “The problem is that we’re creating an international norm,” Dennis M. Gormley, a senior research fellow at the University of Pittsburgh tells Shane. The U.S. position is that it can strike across borders to kill terrorists — Anwar al-Awlaki, for instance — when they are even suspected of planning attacks. How could this country now tell other military powers they can't do the same. So far, the only other country to have made a strike outside the Afghanistan war zone, where British drones are active, is Israel, which used an unmanned vehicle to attack suspected militants in Gaza.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Clearly, the Drone Wars
Heads up, Jedi!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
So Shall Us Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Ack! Beat me to it!
;P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Already happening...
and you end up with counter drone warfare based mostly on EW and ELINT. Also already happening. Sooner or later we or others will start losing Predator class drones due to that. Then the fun will really start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. More worried about hummingbird-sized drones in development
which can fly through a window and kill. Recipe for New World Order:

1 megalomaniac
Several million tiny drones
Access to DARPA database
GPS

Shake, stir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. I would imagine that they're pretty hard to get hold of
Edited on Mon Oct-10-11 09:50 AM by customerserviceguy
for the purposes of copying or whatever. I would imagine that the technology is not as cheap or ubiquitous as the cell phones that are used to arm IED's. It would take a pretty sophisticated society to divert enough resources for this, and the rogue societies that are able to do this right now are pretty much focused on getting nuclear bombs instead.

That's not to say that it cannot happen. But if it did, we'd probably do what we did when Japan sent over floating bombs that rode the jet stream, then dumped fire on our Northwest forests. We analyzed the composition of the sand in the ballast weights, figured out where the factory making the bombs was, and blew it to holy hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Copy? We're probably having them built in Chinese factories
Edited on Mon Oct-10-11 12:27 PM by pscot
I'm sure the Israelis are building their own. There will soon be drones surveilling the Canadian and Mexican borders and it won't be long before Homeland Security is offering funding grants so your local sheriff can stock up. Think Joe Arpaio with a drone airwing. We're in shit up to our necks and the waves are rising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ah, that's where you're wrong
We do keep our defense spending, as much as is practically possible, in the US. That's why the Pentagon budget is so popular, it's big enough to sprinkle at least a few million in every Congressional district. I even worked for a semiconductor factory that got defense work, they didn't even want the job shipped over to our Taiwanese parent company.

Yes, I'm certain the Israelis are building their own. But they're not likely to use them against us, or let them fall into terrorist hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. At least 40 other countries have begun to build or buy— see post # 13
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayhawkSD Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. Oh yes, we thought that way in 1950, too.
The atomic bomb was too complex for anyone to copy. We had a monopoly on that technology because no one else was technologically advanced enough to build one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Persistent delusions of superiority, is what it is.
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 10:32 AM by bemildred
Otherwise knows as "American Exceptionalism". It's not just wrong, it's dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Retaliation and Escalation, till increasingly sophisticated forms of assasination become a norm
Spiral of violence and war won't stop until the real PTB start to be targeted by Hellfire missiles fired at them behind the curtain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. More "security theater", very expensive, nasty, and still unable to enforce much of anything. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. How can not anyone see this escalating till we start losing parts of our cities.
Edited on Mon Oct-10-11 11:26 AM by RC
How much explosives can you pack into a small 2 or 4 person small remote control private plane? Cheap compared to what our military is spending on drones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. I also wonder what happens
When other countries start preemptive strikes on countries they deem "Hostile" or "A threat".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, of course, that would be terrorism.
Same goes for bombs and stuff. When we kill people with them it is all good. When the other side uses them it is terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. For less than $50,000 "a few amateurs could shut down Manhattan."


At least 40 other countries—from Belarus and Georgia to India, Pakistan, and Russia—have begun to build, buy, and deploy unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs, showcasing their efforts at international weapons expos ranging from the premier Paris Air Show to smaller events in Singapore and Bahrain. In the last six months alone, Iran has begun production on a pair of weapons-ready surveillance drones, while China has debuted the Pterodactyl and Sour Dragon, rivals to America's Predator and Global Hawk. All told, two thirds of worldwide investment in unmanned planes in 2010 will be spent by countries other than the United States.



Defending Against Drones
Feb 25, 2010 4:28 PM EST
How our new favorite weapon in the war on terror could soon be turned against us.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/02/25/defending-against-drones.html

Singer is director of the 21st Century Defense Initiative at the Brookings Institution and the author of Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century.

He has lots of commentary in this topic here:

http://www.brookings.edu/experts/singerp.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. No one could have imagined.....
Anyone capable of building electronic components for Boeing could probably gin up something that could fly into a highrise and explode with great effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Drone Wars of WWIII!
Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill USA Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. have you ever heard of the Terminator movies??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Considering how Cheap Peace is
and how much more profitable, to do anything but Peace is to cheat your people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. My hope is that everyone finds a way to "disrupt" these killing machines
Edited on Mon Oct-10-11 08:35 PM by KoKo
where a person in a room somewhere far away...pulls a trigger but never sees the blood guts and dismemberment of these killing machines. They have NO INVOLVMENT. Cold Blooded Killers who never see their prey...just a target on a screen. Collect their salary and go home and someone "high fives them:" MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! They never hear the cries of death or the bereavement of the family and kin of their target. They are removed from it all. It's just another "kill target" ...nothing to see there...move along.

New Wars fought from a room in some country by a gamer who pulls the trigger but on a "remote machine."

I hope a way is found to disrupt them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkmusclmachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. 1984
cubed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
21. MQ-9 Reapers, upstate New York
Unmanned drones to fly in Fort Drum airspace, over Lake Ontario, Adirondacks
October 06, 2011
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2011/10/unmanned_drones_to_fly_in_fort.html


"The air guard unit is based at Hancock Field, but it may take several years before the FAA gives the unit a green light to operate the Reaper in civilian air space around Hancock and the rest of Central New York, he said."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC