Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High Income, No Taxes: How Big Money Beats the IRS - Fiscal Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Bill USA Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:33 PM
Original message
High Income, No Taxes: How Big Money Beats the IRS - Fiscal Times
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2010/12/14/High-Earners-Who-Dont-Pay-Taxes.aspx#page1

No wonder President Obama is calling for tax reform. More than 10,000 Americans who earned more than $200,000 during 2007 paid no income taxes to the U.S. government. And it’s perfectly legal.

These high earners, among the estimated 47 percent of all Americans who pay no federal income tax, benefited from numerous popular, time-honored provisions in the tax laws that aren't likely to go away anytime soon. And the group, while accounting for a tiny sliver of the 143 million income-tax returns filed for 2007, has grown rapidly in recent years.

How can they do it?


> Losses from partnerships or S Corporations, typically small businesses whose income and losses flow through to the owners.

> Investments in nontaxable municipal bonds.

> Extraordinary medical or dental expenses.

> A combination of these factors and others.
(more)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Travis_0004 Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whats your point?
If somebody had huge losses, either through partnerships, or an S corp, then they didn't really net 200k, even if they did gross 200k before deductions. Same with medical bills. Lets say a guy made 200,000 and spent all that on medical bills one year, are you going to tell me that he needs to pay more in taxes?

Also, you will find out that many people on both sides support tax free municipal bonds, since they make borrowing cheaper for cities/states. There are certainly people who don't pay enough in taxes, but from the scenarios you listed, I don't have any problems with these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree
the bullet points listed are viable write offs, and if you're talking about a Sub-chapter S, it's not 200,000 take home as though it were a paycheck. That would be the net profit of the business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC