Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Given that Elena Kagan argued the Siegelman case was correctly decided, we have this obvious

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 07:07 PM
Original message
"Given that Elena Kagan argued the Siegelman case was correctly decided, we have this obvious
question: Why is the Obama DOJ not going after Rick Perry?"


"Why is one legal standard applied to Rick Perry and another to Don Siegelman? For that matter, why is one legal standard applied to George W. Bush (and an almost endless list of other GOP governors) and another to Don Siegelman?

Those questions are at the very heart of the political-prosecution era that the Bush DOJ ushered into our political environment.

A Perry spokesman responded to The Times article by saying the interactions with donors did not constitute bribery:

Mark Miner, a spokesman for Mr. Perry, said there was no connection between Mr. McHale’s contributions and the grant to G-Con. He said that the purpose of the state money was to create jobs and that it was appropriate for Mr. Perry to appoint people who support his vision and policies to state oversight posts."
http://legalschnauzer.blogspot.com/2011/08/will-rick-perry-be-targeted-for-federal.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. She what?
She was one of the only reasons I thought we all had to keep voting for Obama. Oh crap. Yeah, that's a double standard alright. What else? What the hell is left to like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markpkessinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. If you thought either of this President's SC appointments were jparitcularly progressive....
... then you were sadly mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Definitely not all that progressive. AND its way past time for a
flaming, liberal ascend to the Supremes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markpkessinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. What I wouldn't give for another William Brennan! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. her reasoning on that case drives me crazy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. God has damned America.
We are a nation of instant gratification, intellectual dilapidation, and coprophagous mastication. We have morons on the right, morons on the left, and a world of bullshit tilting the scales straight into 'wrong'.

The Dog and Pony show isn't over, and people are arguing over whether the canine or equine will take the prize. Too long ago the bovine took it out the back, and no one wants to follow the trail of patties.

We're well and goodly screwn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. coprophagous mastication
What, no room for vomit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Huge K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-11 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. The Obama DOJ? Did not Bush use the Patriot Act to replace it, and Obama, yet, has not.
So, why not Rick Perry? Because Bush made the DOJ partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyohiolib Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. iokiyar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC