Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CHART: Cost of Wall Street bailouts vs wars, race to moon, Louisiana Purchase, & more

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 07:53 PM
Original message
CHART: Cost of Wall Street bailouts vs wars, race to moon, Louisiana Purchase, & more
As Washington continues to blather about the need for sacrifices for the rest of us, just a reminder of how they treat the people who broke our and the world economy.

It's socialism for the rich and Somalia for the rest.




http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/bailout-costs-vs-big-historical-events/">Source
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is that adjusted for inflation?

If not... it is meaningless.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R. P. McMurphy Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes. It is adjusted for inflation.
Or so it says in the second paragraph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Outrageous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. "all the monies spent, lent, consumed, borrowed, printed, guaranteed, assumed or ... committed"
in other words, they're comparing true COSTS of of other things, such as the wars, etc., to some MIX of costs, losses, and LENDING -- some of which has already been returned, and some of which will still be returned. not all of it, of course, but the point is:

this is a false comparison, apples to oranges.


given that the amounts involved are staggering even if presented honestly, and so the point remains the same, it never ceases to amaze me that people don't bother to get it right. i mean, why lie with statistics when the truth achieves the same effect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC