Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jeb Bush and America's addiction to dynasties

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 02:51 PM
Original message
Jeb Bush and America's addiction to dynasties
Tuesday, Feb 1, 2011 13:43 ET
War Room
Jeb Bush and America's addiction to dynasties
By Steve Kornacki



http://www.salon.com/news/jeb_bush/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2011/02/01/jeb_bush_president

When it comes to politics, Americans sure seem to like familiar faces and names. There have been 15 presidential elections since 1952, and in all but two -- 1964 and 2008 -- the Republican ticket has included someone named "Nixon," "Dole," or "Bush." And while there's been a little more variety on the Democratic side, it may be mainly the result of tragedy: How many more national tickets would have featured a Kennedy if not for two assassinations and Chappaquiddick?

For a brief moment in the 2008 campaign, it seemed we might be on the verge of something of a post-dynastic era, with Democrats spurning Hillary Clinton in favor of a first-term senator who had been in the Illinois state Legislature just four years earlier, and with the Bush family name in disrepute thanks to George W.'s misadventures. But that was probably an illusion, something we were reminded of earlier this week, when Jeb Bush dropped yet another hint that he sees a White House run in his future.

"If I ran for office, I would be a proud younger brother of George W. Bush and a proud son of George H.W. Bush," the former Florida governor said in Nevada on Monday. As he has done before, Bush ruled out running for president next year, but left the door wide open for 2016.

He probably can afford to wait. As I've written before, despite the sour economy, the 2012 GOP nomination may not look that appealing to ambitious Republicans, especially with the example of Bill Clinton's post-1994 comeback still relatively fresh in their minds. So from Bush's standpoint, why not take a chance that the nomination will be open in '16, when he'll be 63 -- and when the taint from his brother will be less pronounced (if there's even any taint left)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll bet he can lick that taint!
Freakin' assholes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC