Brainwashington, DC

[GermanDJ]

There's an interesting editorial on the website of c't, one of Germanys most important computer magazines. The author, Matthias Broeckers, has written two books about the events of 9/11, the first one being a tremendous success in Germany and was translated in several different languages.

In this editorial he gives a brief overview why he thinks that the official explanations on the events of September 11th are rather suspious:

http://www.heise.de/tp/english/inhalt/co/15416/1.html

[Wonder]

1. yes I have many times wondered about this

" So far, summarised briefly, this is the official version of events and what followed. But if we look a little more closely, we have to notice that until today the criminal case of the 9-11 attacks has remained entirely unsolved. Investigations by police and authorities utterly failed, none of the real backers and preparators of these attacks were found, also no hard evidence and no terrorist was captured. In fact, after 18 months we do not know more than we knew 48 hours after the attacks, when that list of the 19 Hijackers had been published. So the results of the greatest police-operation in history amount to virtually nothing. "

interesting the lead post... seems all takes a back to seat to the next SAVIOR of the USofA...

but encapsulated in my memory and the memory of others are some of the points made in this lead post...

I just listened to Kerry's speech on C-span and am once again struck by the complete absence of the gravity of what has transpired here. I must say in comparision Gore's speech sounds like a complete expose(accent on the e) which I don't really feel it was... edgy rhetoric hardly any real bark.

oh well.