Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Support Your Local Billionaire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:39 AM
Original message
Support Your Local Billionaire
Support Your Local Billionaire
By David Glenn Cox


Are you a ten dollar man? That’s what local blue-collar jobs are paying these days, $10 per hour, and that’s if you’re lucky. Many are paying minimum wage or a dollar over minimum wage and it is effectively a starvation wage, a plantation wage. If you work a forty-hour week, which many do not, you probably earn less than $80 per week in discretionary income, and that’s if you don’t own an automobile. If you do then you have zero discretionary income.

Zero discretionary income means that you are not a participant in the economy any more than slaves in Alabama were in the 1850s. You’re not just a wage slave, you’re a slave slave. The genius of the New Deal was not in just creating jobs; any idiot can create jobs, but the trick is in creating good jobs.

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner was quick to point out today that American exports to China have risen 50 percent this year. What Mr. Geithner is forgetting to mention, or just plain ignoring, is that all exports are not created equal. What China imports from the United States are raw materials and what it exports back to the US are finished goods.

We’re picking the cotton and they are selling us back the finished shirts. But it’s even worse than that because it’s not cotton, it’s coal that we are selling them, or what our government euphemistically calls “mineral fuels.” Coal companies earn huge profits but for the economy overall it is meaningless and for the environment disastrous.

Here is what you, the American workers, are expected to compete with on a heads-up basis. The average Chinese factory worker earns $292 monthly, and average wages for a Mexican factory worker are $401 per month. An economy that does not build things cannot grow. There is great profit in turning $400 worth of steel into a Chevrolet, but in a service economy where you wash my dog while I watch your kids, it's a downward spiral without any growth potential.

Here is how free trade actually operates: Whirlpool Corporation shifted production from its Indiana factory to its new factory in Mexico in 2009 and eliminated 1,100 full time jobs. That means 1,100 Mexican workers will begin paying taxes and 1,100 Americans will cease paying taxes, but it also means 1,100 Americans are no longer a part of the economy.

Want to buy a snowmobile factory? Polaris Industries plans to save $30 million annually by closing or selling its Osceola, Wisconsin factory and moving to Monterey, Mexico. Free traders will tell you that that means lower prices for the consumers but I doubt seriously that Polaris has any price cuts planned. Their concern is merely higher earnings.

The one-two punch of free trade is that the US government will not receive one penny in tariffs but it also loses the revenue from the unemployed workers who go from economic engine to economic liability. The monthly trade deficit for the United States economy is around $38 to $40 billion per month. So aside from the moral obligation of a society to its members, and aside from the damage caused by free trade to state and local governments, we have to understand that this is also an unsustainable business model.

Right-wingers and libertarians will argue that it’s a corporation's right to move wherever production is cheapest and I won’t argue with that one iota. The American market place, however, belongs to the American people and selling in that market is a taxable event. It is the government’s sovereign obligation to protect the economy of the United States on political, economic and moral grounds.

This is not an issue to be divided by party or political philosophy; this is an issue of national sustainability. Immediately after the American Revolution the founding fathers put high import tariffs on manufactured goods in place and not because they were xenophobic or anti-trade. They feared that Great Britain would use her economic power to stunt and hobble the American economy. You see, the global economy idea is really nothing new. Great Britain invented the global economy and used it successfully to make herself rich at the expense of colonials for several hundred years.

Tariffs are taxes that you don’t pay; they are the price of admission into the American economy. Tariffs both financed the post-Revolutionary War government and helped to spur America’s industrialization. They are protectionist in the same way the Navy and Coast Guard are protectionist; they protect our economy and jobs.

FDR said in his “forgotten man” speech: “What we must do is this: To revise our tariff on the basis of a reciprocal exchange of goods, allowing other nations to buy and to pay for our goods by sending us such of their goods as will not seriously throw any of our industries out of balance, and, incidentally, making impossible in this county the continuance of pure monopolies which cause us to pay excessive prices for many of the necessities of life.”

Today we have a situation where world corporations, both foreign and domestic, use free trade to enrich themselves by exploiting workers. They import components into Mexico for assembly then export them into the United State for sale. The city of Tijuana has grown, luring rural people to work in factories and because of that the city needs a new sewage treatment system but there is a problem. Because the corporations pay little or no taxes and the workers earn such small incomes, the World Bank estimates that it would be impossible to finance a new water treatment plant. Plus, factories like Samsung dump chemicals and solvents into the water supply which go to a treatment plant that was never designed to treat them. The untreated water is dumped into the Pacific Ocean and washes up on California beaches all courtesy of the free trade follies.

The American public is spoon-fed the lie that everyone is doing it when fifty percent of all outsourcing done on planet Earth is done from the United States.

“US business firms enjoy greater flexibility than their counterparts in Western Europe and Japan in decisions to expand capital plant, to lay off surplus workers, and to develop new products. At the same time, they face higher barriers to enter their rivals' home markets than foreign firms face entering US markets.” (CIA Factbook)

They use euphemisms like productivity, flexibility and cost savings but it is nothing less than the enslavement of the poor and working class by the rich corporations. Their control was apparent when 33 days after British Petroleum turned the Gulf of Mexico into a toxic waste dump, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said, "If we find they're not doing what they're supposed to be doing, we'll push them out of the way appropriately." Salazar said that but he did not specify at what point this would occur or what might be the trigger for it.

Since when are corporations in charge? If a building catches fire you don’t call the owner to see what they want done. If someone robs the bank you don’t call a shareholders meeting. This disaster of corporatism will punish an entire region of the United States. Millions of people will lose billions of dollars in income and the best answer they’ve got is, “We’re trusting you guys to do the right thing, and, well, if you’re not doing the right thing, well then, well uh, well, then we’ll all be very, very disappointed in you." Again and again they put the desires and wishes of the corporations over the sovereign interest of the citizens of the United States.

Now with the Greek crisis and European debt has brought the budget cutters to the fore with their talons out, pointed directly at Social Security and Medicare. They talk openly about the need to cut social programs; the next leg down in corporate servitude. You see, workers earning $10.00 an hour don’t earn enough to support social programs let alone a gargantuan military. They don’t earn enough to positively impact the economy in any way. They’re all just slaves on the corporate plantation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dave That Was Fabulous
Every word a golden one, every position unassailable. This has got to go viral.

Recommended a Trillion times!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucognizant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Yeh!.........
AND my SS income is $5.00 per hour. What does that make me?
On that I am taking a college course.................The course is free at my age but the fuel to commute is $348.00 for the 3 weeks of the class. ( & I get 50 mpg in my diesel rabbit!)
I am not going for a degree, but learning a skill that could = earnings!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
41. co-signed! And a huge kick. I was to late for a rec. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Would you mind if I printed a few copies?
To pass out to the tea-baggers I have to deal with? This is common ground for both the Left and Right.:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent information and commentary.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Spot on. When will our "news" organizations start reporting this travesty? Oh...
wait their part of this corporatocracy - so NEVER.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mimitabby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. clear, well written!
excellent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. Dave, I've been part of DU in one shape, form or fashion since early 2002.
And during that time certain posters rise to the "damn near Oracle" level. This is you. There are only a few posters that I must read. One is "Time for change," another is you. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudohioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R!!!
As usual, an excellent post.

Meanwhile, we the people are being spoon-fed the notion that our biggest threat is illegal aliens and terrorism. Scary how many of us are buying it. I dunno, but the much bigger (and more relevant) threat should be that the $10 an hour job isn't going to pay the rent/mortgage, and then you'll all be out on the streets, all the while wondering "what the fuck happened"?

You're right, it has nothing to do with right or left. But the powers that be would like for us to think it is. You know, the whole divide and conquer bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. nothing to do with right or left but everything to do with CLASS
...and the OWNERSHIP society.

Someone needs to come up with a more descriptive term than class warfare. A word to describe the warfare against the have-nots and a word to describe the necessary battle against the haves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
66 dmhlt Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. Well, we could handout buttons ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudohioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Oh I love that!
And welcome to DU!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudohioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. I couldn't agree with you more!
Any suggestions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fatbuckel Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. It`s a race to the bottom,people.....Go Walmart!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Metal Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. We should be in the streets
Screaming this from the tops of our lungs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Yes we should be in the streets

But Americans have become too complacent, preferring to watch mindless TV, thinking we will soon be 'back to normal' (being able to buy lots of stuff). But as the economy continues to spiral downward and more people lose jobs, have no income nor savings, and become homeless and hungry, then we'll see herds of Americans in the streets. Because by then we will have lost everything, and there will be nothing else to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
42. When we have more people living in the streets more will speak out
at the moment they have most Americans working their bums off (if they have a job) just to keep up. Min Wage should have been 10 an hour a decade ago. I was in Australia as I watched congress in the 90's over and over give themselves a pay raise but not touch minimum wage. Who were they? Mostly the GOP!

We lose our democracy the moment we lose our educated middle class - and that is exactly what they want. Cannot fight or protest if you are to busy trying to survive and to afraid of losing your job.

Sad state of affairs that isnt getting any better until Corporate money is removed from our elections and when corporations are no longer considered individuals that can do whatever they like from murder to eco-terrorism. As long as they have the $$ to buy themselves out of jail.

/rant off
Cheers
sandy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bergie321 Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
handmade34 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. excellent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. A Few Words of Encouragement from your Congress
Meanwhile, members of Congress are losing their appetite even for renewing existing benefits. Several members of the House and Senate have flirted with the idea that unemployment checks make people too lazy to look for work. Most recently, Rep. Kathy Dahlkemper (D-Pa.) told the Washington Post that businesses in her district wanted to start hiring but were getting few applicants because Congress had given the unemployed so many weeks of benefits.

"Now, whether that's true or not, I'm still trying to decipher," said Dahlkemper. "But I think it's something we really need to look at."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudohioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well, tell ya what....
Since those members of Congress are just so damned concerned about the deficit, I propose that all of their salaries be cut to an amount equaling the highest rate of unemployment benefits for their particular districts. Maybe we should be balancing the budget on THEIR backs for a change!

And when they have exhausted all of their savings, assets and UI bennies, and are voted out of office, let's see 'em make their mortgage payments AND put food on the table with that job at Mickey D's that they are so fond of endorsing for the rest of us.

That is, if they aren't considered 'overqualified' for the position.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R! I agree ! //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. K&R!
In praise of tariffs? Excellent piece!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is so RIGHT that it's beyond scary.
Dave, this is a magnificent piece.

There is one other element of this that was not mentioned but needs to be said: our American "investor class", which includes many so-called liberals will NEVER do anything that jeopardizes their earnings from the Stock Market. These are people who have enough money to sink large sums into investments that are really the backbone and impetus of the corporate perfidy that is leading to this new slavery.

When people are more concerned about the return on investment than they are on HOW that return was made, the result is what we are seeing now.

Recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. Protectionist?
Damned Straight I'm a "Protectionist",
because some things are worth protecting.
For instance, the American Working Class.

There are NO "Free Markets".
There is NO Giant Invisible Hand.
The RICH (Corporate Owners) made that shit up,
and sold it to a gullible America with the help of their puppets in BOTH Political parties.

Ross Perot was right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. I voted for Perot - He was right!

The "giant sucking sound" was United States Presidential candidate Ross Perot's colorful phrase for what he believed would be the negative effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which he opposed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_sucking_sound


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
22. If only the voters could understand that.
And it's really sad that so many of the "educated" among us don't get it.

"Unsustainable" is exactly right. It's common sense reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
23. Precisely
All brought to you by the Ronald Reagan Administration and his "Robber Baron" friends with their plan for the second "Gilded Age".:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
24. K&R. great summary of work camp America.
:kick: & R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
26. A great read..
Beware the deficit terrorists. They are poised to destroy what remains of our tattered middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
28. K& R & Forward
Edited on Thu May-27-10 10:59 AM by LongTomH
:kick:
This is going out to my own email list with the suggestion that everyone forward it to as many people as possible.

Thanks for a brilliant analysis, Dave!

Edited to add: Ooops! They wouldn't let me recommend; more than 24 hours have passed. Still a great piece!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
29. I'll quibble with you on the "one iota, Dave...
Edited on Thu May-27-10 11:57 AM by JHB
Not really a disagreement so much as something I think needs to be stressed at every opportunity:

A corporation is itself (as the Libertarians and Right-Wingers like to put it) "government interference in the market".

The government enforces a number of privileges for corporations: limited liability, transferable ownership, perpetual existence, taxation levied on profit rather than income, etc.

Why is one form of interference sacrosanct while others ("protectionism", "regulation", for starters) are beyond the pale?

"Interference in the market" is one of the things governments do to encourage stability and prosperity, from the first establishment of standard weights and measures, through the establishment of civil courts to adjudicate disputes, to patent, trademark, and common-carrier laws, right up to business regulation and social "safety net" programs, the more complex the economy the more "interference" is needed to maintain a balance.

So I will argue that point "an iota", and likely more, with those who make that argument.

Corporations or capitalism can harness human nature (from the ambition to improve one's lot to outright greed) for the common good, but only if they are actually harnessed to the common good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Actually, governments create corporations by granting them charters!
A good book on the history and growth of corporations is Douglas Rushkoff's Life Inc: How the World Became a Corporation and How to Get it Back. It covers 400 years of corporate history and the tactics corporations have used to dominate 'private' and public life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
30. If you compete with sweatshops, even if you win, you lose.
I've said it before and I'll say it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celtic Merlin Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
34. Daveparts - EXCELLENT summary of the importance of manufacturing . . .
. . . to a healthy and growing economy and the consequences of exporting American jobs overseas.

My favorite example is the Levi-Strauss Corporation, which closed all of its North American jeans manufacturing plants (including two in Canada) and shipped the jobs to the Pacific rim and elsewhere. The EXECUTIVES kept their jobs in the San Francisco headquarters and were paid bonuses for all of the extra profits their move made for the company. The price of their jeans actually went up after the move (to cover the costs associated with closing their plants here and opening new ones there) and this is on top of the corporate tax deductions they received for these same expenses. Overall, the US made it a very profitable move for them.

None of this BULLSHIT will end until we have public campaign finance. Once we chase the corporations out of our legislators' offices and deny them the power to buy our representatives with campaign dollars, we'll get our country back. For only THEN will these elected officials HAVE to respond to the needs of We, The People.

Until then, we're facked.

Celtic Merlin
Carlinist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
35. Excellent, Sir! My Hat Is Off To You
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
36. There is a simple solution. Tariffs! Unionization! Tax reform!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgangmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
37. The crux of this argument is this.
"Right-wingers and libertarians will argue that it’s a corporation's right to move wherever production is cheapest and I won’t argue with that one iota. The American market place, however, belongs to the American people and selling in that market is a taxable event. It is the government’s sovereign obligation to protect the economy of the United States on political, economic and moral grounds."


The American market is STILL that largest in the world by a long margin. If we don't use that advantage to our advantage then we will lose it. We are either for the people or we are for the billionaires and I wouldn't piss on a rich man if he was on fire. Throw on a gallon of gas - yes. And don't get me started on what I think insurance executive deserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
38. i was making $10 an hour in 1979 in new york city.
i don't know how people can live. i've met some who are making $7.00 an hour or $280 a week. it comes out to $1120 a month. here in arizona if you make more than $860 a month you do not qualify for medicaid. how can someone afford health care on $1120 a month?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
39. Right On!
Citizens United should be a wake up call to every American and I bet 75% of Americans don't even know what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tango-tee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
40. Excellent!
Sorry I was too late to rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC