Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is torturing war prisoners a betrayal of U.S. values?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 11:06 AM
Original message
Is torturing war prisoners a betrayal of U.S. values?
Saturday, May 22, 2004

Is torturing war prisoners a betrayal of U.S. values?

By DAVID HORSEY
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER EDITORIAL CARTOONIST

James Inhofe, the Oklahoma senator from the Neanderthal wing of the Republican Party, may still believe that the only practitioners of degradation and torture in the U.S. military were seven isolated misfits at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison. However, stories suggesting something much different continue to pile up:


Three Iraqi employees of Reuters and one NBC staffer, also an Iraqi, were detained by U.S. forces in January. They claim they were beaten and humiliated in various ways. After three days, they were released without charges.


The former commander at the Guantanamo prison camp, Brig. Gen. Rick Baccus, says he was relieved of his duties because the Pentagon believed he was too soft on the prisoners. His insistence on humane treatment did not please interrogators who wanted to use harsher methods.


Thursday, NBC News reported allegations that, at several secret detention facilities in Iraq operated by Delta Force commandos, torture of prisoners is routine and robust.


Sgt. Samuel Provance, a member of an intelligence battalion stationed at Abu Ghraib, told ABC News the use of torture was not limited to a few renegade MPs. The Army is trying to cover up the fact that abuses are widespread, he said.
~snip~
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/saturdayspin/174464_bq22.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. screw so called "American values". . .
Edited on Sat May-22-04 11:18 AM by stellanoir
When porn makes more dough than any other domestic industry, how can we possibly profess to represent the "moral high ground."

These abuses are fundamentally inhumane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. When a war seen as illegal by most of the world is being waged,
such war is also surely viewed as unnecessary, unjust, immoral, and inhumane, even in the absence of inhumane treatment of prisoners: would not this inhumane treatment just be frosting on the cakes of those who took this nation to war and icing on the cakes of those media and other talking heads who shilled for pre-emptive war, including those shills of the religious right (are you listening Jerry, and do you often ponder just what just desserts might be in store for you?)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes. It is somewhere on the list headed by
waging aggressive war with the intent of gaining hegemony over another sovereign state.

I think you will find that bush has shredded and composted nearly the entire set of positive American values. The crimes of the BFEE defy language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. I Have Always Wondered
What the Hell are US/American Values. I'm an American, but I know what I value is not the same thing that Bush and his crowd value.

Can anyone give me a definiton of these so-called American Values, and who do they apply to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Suppose
in November the American people answer yes, torture is a means justified by their end. They can do it easily, by returning Bush.

What will that tell the world about "American values"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly.
Edited on Sat May-22-04 12:21 PM by Martin Eden
Endorsing Bush with another four years would send the message to the world that the American people endorse torture and all the other abhorrent policies of his administration.

If you can't convince your fellow Americans of this from the perspective of morals and values, maybe they'll understand it from the perspective of real world pragmatism. Sure, torture may be justified in rare "ticking time bomb" circumstances, but the torture policy implemented by the Bushies has been tremendously counterproductive in terms of fighting terrorism and has done real damage to our national interests.

It will be very difficult to reclaim America's former standing in the world, and impossible if Bush wins in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. My letter to Mr. Horsey
Edited on Sat May-22-04 01:06 PM by Barrett808
Dear Mr. Horsey,

Re your Buring Question for today ("Is torturing war prisoners a betrayal of U.S. values?") I ask, "Which US values do you mean?" Given the atrocious history of US interventions in, for example, Latin America, defining what we mean by "US values" is a difficult exercise. Consider these three examples (which are by no means aberrations):

Battalion 316 (Honduras)
Atlacatl Battalion (El Salvador)
Operation Condor (South America)

In each case, US-trained death squads (euphemistically, "paramilitaries") were deployed to destabilize (or support) regimes that displeased (or pleased) the administration. Under US sponsorship and direction, these state-sponsored terrorists prosecuted campaigns of torture (El Aguacate air base) and mass murder (El Mozote massacre) against small nations.

From these and many other cases, it would be easy to conclude that torture, mass murder, and war crimes are very much in the spirit of US values. State terror on this scale would not be possible without the associated US values of official denial and secrecy, enabled by a docile and incurious citizenry. John Negroponte, who is suspected by many of complicity with war crimes in Honduras, has been designated by Bush to head the new "embassy" in Baghdad; we can be forgiven for thinking that these unspoken US values will continue to guide policy.

Is torturing war prisoners a betrayal of U.S. values? The long and horrifying history of US interventions clearly tells us, "Not at all." Is torture a betrayal of the values of civilized people, as codified by the Geneva Conventions and international human rights laws? Of course. To this, Bush himself has expressed the traditional US values of arrogance and contempt for law: "International law? I'd better call my lawyer."

Barrett808
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Horsey ran my LTE
http://seattlep-i.nwsource.com.edgesuite.net/saturdayspin/175473_bqweb29.html

Regarding your Burning Question ("Is torturing war prisoners a betrayal of U.S. values?") I ask, "Which U.S. values do you mean?" Given the atrocious history of U.S. interventions in, for example, Latin America, defining what we mean by "U.S. values" is a difficult exercise. Consider these three examples (which are by no means aberrations):

Battalion 316 (Honduras)

Atlacatl Battalion (El Salvador)

Operation Condor (South America)

In each case, US-trained death squads (euphemistically, "paramilitaries") were deployed to destabilize (or support) regimes that displeased (or pleased) the administration. Under US sponsorship and direction, these state-sponsored terrorists prosecuted campaigns of torture (El Aguacate air base) and mass murder (El Mozote massacre) against small nations.

From these and many other cases, it would be easy to conclude that torture, mass murder, and war crimes are very much in the spirit of US values. State terror on this scale would not be possible without the associated US values of official denial and secrecy, enabled by a docile and incurious citizenry. John Negroponte, who is suspected by many of complicity with war crimes in Honduras, has been designated by Bush to head the new "embassy" in Baghdad; we can be forgiven for thinking that these unspoken US values will continue to guide policy.

Is torturing war prisoners a betrayal of U.S. values? The long and horrifying history of US interventions clearly tells us, "Not at all." Is torture a betrayal of the values of civilized people, as codified by the Geneva Conventions and international human rights laws? Of course. To this, Bush himself has expressed the traditional US values of arrogance and contempt for law: "International law? I'd better call my lawyer."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. great letter, congrats
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myopic4141 Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Moral relativism
To adhere to Inhofe's stanch, one must believe that Inhofe and those of his ilk believe in moral relativism rather than good an evil. After all, stating that our atrocities are not as bad as Sadam Hussein's raises the difference to the lesser of two evils. His statement says as much about his depth of religious faith as it says about anything else. He is a religious man; but, not a person of faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is it? I dont think it is....we are pretty brutal.
There is alot of self-delusion in this country that we are "nice guys", when in reality we are pretty brutal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC