If one man can single-handedly poison the debate over significant issues in America, that man is Frank Luntz
by Bill Berkowitz | February 10, 2010 - 10:36am | permalink
article tools: email | print | read more Bill Berkowitz
Frank Luntz is above all else a practical man. Everything he does has been carefully calculated, weighed, and measured, be it his focus groups, his questionable "fair and balanced" polling, or his Instant Response dial sessions. And there are words. Words that influence political campaigns; words that sway public opinion; words that confuse; words that deceive. Most of all, words that win. If you're looking for poetry do not come knocking of Luntz's door. If you're looking for color, you'll not discover a Luntzian rainbow. What you will find these days, however, is his Mighty Wurlitzer of words cranked up to full blast.
If Luntz has his druthers, he will help turn the battle over regulatory reform into a repeat of the fight over healthcare reform; a knock-down, dragged-out process that in the end will lead to more confusion, more cynicism, and more stasis. (Luntz instructs clients to use the word "more" as often as possible.)
-snip-
Deja vu all over againIf much of this sounds familiar, that's because it is consistent with the Luntz playbook for defeating healthcare reform. In his 28-page report titled "The Language of Health Care 2009," Luntz laid out "The 10 Rules for Stopping the 'Washington Takeover' of Health Care." Anyone that has followed the health care reform from debate from the very beginning will not only recognize a number of the following talking points, but will likely think to themselves, "Hey, I've heard those lines before." In June of last year, Media Matters for America pointed out that in a press release issued by House Minority Leader John Boehner "criticizing a health care report by President Obama's Council of Economic Advisers," Rep. Boehner use five Luntz-created talking points in one sentence.
After laying out his talking points, Luntz emphatically states that Republicans "MUST be vocally and passionately on the side of reform."
The talking points:
1) "Humanize your approach" by talking only about individuals and not the "healthcare system";
2) "Acknowledge the 'crisis' or suffer the consequences" - reframe the meaning of "crisis." The script: "If you're one of the millions who can't afford healthcare, it is a crisis." "Or better yet" suggests Luntz: "If some bureaucrat puts himself between you and your doctor, denying you exactly what you need, that's a crisis";
3) "'Time' is the government healthcare killer" - "Delayed care is denied care." The script: "Waiting to buy a car or even a house won't kill you. But waiting for the healthcare you need - could. Delayed healthcare is denied care.";
4) "The arguments against the Democrats' healthcare plan must center around 'politicians,' 'bureaucrats,' and 'Washington.' ... not the free market, tax incentives, or competition";
5) "The healthcare denial horror stories from Canada & Co. do resonate, but you have to humanize them." Luntz recommends using the term "government takeover" rather than "government run" or "government controlled." The script: "In countries with government run healthcare, politicians make YOUR healthcare decisions. THEY decide if you'll get the procedure you need, or if you are disqualified because the treatment is too expensive or because you are too old. We can't have that in America.";
6) "Healthcare quality = 'getting the treatment you need, when you need it." The script: "The plan put forward by the Democrats will deny people the treatments they need and make them wait to get the treatments they are allowed to receive.";
7) "One-six-does-NOT-fit-all." The script: Call for "the protection of the personalized doctor-patient relationship.";
8) "WASTE, FRAUD, and ABUSE are your best targets for how to bring down costs";
9) "Americans will expect the government to look out for those who truly can't afford healthcare." The script: "A balanced, common-sense approach that provides assistance to those who truly need it and keeps healthcare patient-centered rather than government-centered for everyone.";
10) "It's not enough to just say what you're against. You have to tell them what you're for." The script: When describing what you're proposing, use the word "more" as often as possible - There will be "more access to more treatments and more doctors ... will less interference from insurance companies and Washington politicians and special interests."
"The document," Luntz pointed out, was "based on polling results and Instant Response dial sessions conducted in April 2009." And he noted that because "more than one quarter of the population will back significant government involvement in healthcare and a third support 'universal' care," the primary target is the "persuadables and generate support among wayward Republicans and conservatives."
MUCH MORE ...GOOD READ about the WORDSMITH who CONTROLS OUR POLITICAL DIALOG at.....
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/26681