Diplomacy 101

[IndianaGreen]

Diplomacy 101

Published: November 27, 2009

We were thrilled when President Obama decided to plunge fully into the Middle East peace effort. He appointed a skilled special envoy, George Mitchell, and demanded that Israel freeze settlements, Palestinians crack down on anti-Israel violence and Arab leaders demonstrate their readiness to reach out to Israel.

Nine months later, the president’s promising peace initiative has unraveled.

The Israelis have refused to stop all building. The Palestinians say that they won’t talk to the Israelis until they do, and President Mahmoud Abbas is so despondent he has threatened to quit. Arab states are refusing to do anything.

Mr. Obama’s own credibility is so diminished (his approval rating in Israel is 4 percent) that serious negotiations may be farther off than ever.

Peacemaking takes strategic skill. But we see no sign that President Obama and Mr. Mitchell were thinking more than one move down the board. The president went public with his demand for a full freeze on settlements before securing Israel’s commitment. And he and his aides apparently had no plan for what they would do if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said no.

Most important, they allowed the controversy to obscure the real goal: nudging Israel and the Palestinians into peace talks. (We don’t know exactly what happened but we are told that Mr. Obama relied more on the judgment of his political advisers — specifically his chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel — than of his Mideast specialists.)

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/28/opinion/28sat1.html?_r=2

[C_Lawyer09]

1. Believe it or not

The Middle East Peace Process was tops on the National Security Strategy agenda of the Bush admin. until it was quickly and successfully co-opted by Project for the New American Century (PNAC)Cheney, Perle, Wolfowitz, etc. What a shame. I truly believe following through on this festering problem is key to peace, not the Carter era containment doctrine, now repackaged as pre-emptive counterterrorism.