Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pat Buchanan, voice of reason??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
SanFranciscoDemocrat Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 01:05 PM
Original message
Pat Buchanan, voice of reason??
In the May 10, 2004 issue of "The American Conservative", in "Fallujah: High Tide of Empire?", Pat Buchanan takes on the neocons and Bush's fantasy of forced democracy.

http://www.amconmag.com/2004_05_10/buchanan.html

I consider Buchanan pretty much a raving lunatic, but he has some credibility on the right, and I'm heartened to see him make his case, even if it is based upon his isolationist philosophy.

An excerpt:

Empire requires an unshakeable belief in the superiority of one’s own race, religion, and civilization and an iron resolve to fight to impose that faith and civilization upon other peoples.

We are not that kind of people. Never have been. Americans, who preach the equality of all races, creeds, and cultures, are, de facto, poor imperialists. When we attempt an imperial role as in the Philippines or Iraq, we invariably fall into squabbling over whether a republic should be imposing its ideology on another nation. A crusade for democracy is a contradiction in terms.

While it would be nice if Brazil, Bangladesh, and Burundi all embraced democracy, why should we fight them if they don’t, and why should our soldiers die to restore democracy should they lose it? Why is that our problem, if they are not threatening us?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pat Buchanan said this?
"Empire requires an unshakeable belief in the superiority of one’s own race, religion, and civilization and an iron resolve to fight to impose that faith and civilization upon other peoples.

We are not that kind of people. "

This sounds like the kind of thing that would be right up his alley!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. I heard him the other day saying that when Iraq holds elections,
you will have people campaigning on "I will get the Americans out". He said that we should leave now because once they are elected, we will be forced out or their constituents will then get angry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Too Late, they angry/pissed already. The torture story was the killer.
Al Qaida got free recruiting material comps of photos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes, it was before this scandal broke. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Free elections in Iraq will...
only bring to power, religious fanatics. In that case, who is better... Saddam or the above?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. George Will is also writing serious criticism of neocons lately.
I've actually started reading him, can't usually endure his pure bile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. As horrible as Pat is
he is a true conservative, unwilling to engage the "outside world," for good or ill. Might be nice to push a "Pat for Prez" internet campaign so as to draw off votes from * from true conservatives.... Oh! but that would be a dirty trick....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonmoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Which is what we need to do
if our opponents no longer play by the rules then we will lose if we do play by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yah know. . .
Pat's been strangely making a lot more sense lately. You have to consider that he must have been unbelievably humbled after Watergate. He sounds a lot more Libertarian that Republican lately. Find it somewhat curious. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SanFranciscoDemocrat Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Conservatives devour neocons, film at 11?
I have to admit to a bit of schaedenfreude watching Will, Buchanan, et al turn on the neocons. I actually have a lot of respect for a truly conservative agenda. What the neocons are practicing and preaching is by no means conservative, it is radical and destructive and, I believe, fundamentally unamerican. If this is pointed out by people on the right as well as those of us on the left, maybe more people will listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I actually respect real Conservatives too, like my good marriage
between two HONEST people that has lasted 30 years because our opposites complement one another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. reply to # 7 and # 9
Yeah, Conservatism and Liberalism should complement, not oppose each other. I can respect true Conservatives, and in truth, you can work with a true Conservative to achieve common ground. It's only when the nuts like Colter, Rush, DeLay and the like come out spewing vitriol that things get truly ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. he does make sense sometimes....
Pat is nothing if not candid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Castor Troy Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Far from a libertarian
Pat is not exactly a libertarian. He just thinks we shouldn't be trying to impose our will on the world. I agree.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightperson Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Reason or no reason,
I think he is a consistently entertaining writer, a good "stylist". He has a sense of humor and I think accepts that much of America considers him as far out as as Tim Leary. There are a lot of dull and interchangeable writers out there on both the left and right, but I always check out his weekly hand-chopping alliteration about Bush being "feckless in his failure to face down Ariel Sharon". No wonder Goldwater, Nixon, and Reagan employed him as a speech writer and Reagan made him Communications Director.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quispquake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Hunter Thompson always enjoyed hanging with Pat...
...when he was Nixon's speechwriter, he & Thompson would go out drinking and have some pretty interesting conversations...I don't agree with 85% of Pat's opinions, but I do agree that he's a unique individual...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sivafae Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. I have to agree
I have been reading him for a while and his viewpoints on Iraq are actually quite sound, which to me is trippy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reverend_Smitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. He was on Randi Rhodes
a few weeks ago and I wasn't disgusted by him. Now only if he wasn't completely homophobic, xenophobic and every other kind of phobic, I might actually like the guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Buchanan can seem reasonable but!!!!!
Some of his reasons are highly suspect. He essentially is an old fashioned isolationist bolstered by some anti Israeli (if not anti-Jewish - it is sometimes hard to tell) bias. He opposed the first Iraq war because he thought it was an Israeli conspiracy, for example. I haven't paid enough attention to his rants this time around but I suspect that his views haven't changed much. He is also somewhat bigoted against persons of non-European descent - not so much a racial bigotry as a cultural bigotry. Essentially he believes that America is the highest representation of Western Civilization and that dilution of our culture by non-Europeans will destroy our American brand of Western Civilization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
19. Yep, it's come to that...
A foaming-at-the-mouth anti-Semite paleocon is actually more reasonable than the entire executive branch... and most of the legislative branch as well. And don't get me started on the judicial branch...

This is utterly bizarre.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC