NOVEMBER 25, 2009
Dodging the Big One
By JAMES B. STEWART
WSJ
As we sit down this week to give thanks, investors face a cornucopia of blessings. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and other economists have proclaimed the end of the worst recession since the Great Depression. The gross domestic product grew 2.8% in the third quarter. For the stock market, this year seems destined to enter the record books. From its low on March 9, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has soared just under 60%. Almost every asset class has gained, some dramatically. Gold has been hitting new records, commodity prices have surged, and the residential real estate market has shown renewed signs of life. Even art is making a comeback.
This state of affairs is all the more remarkable considering where we were just a year ago. The economy and stock market were in free fall. The uncertainty was unnerving. The mood was as bleak as anything I've experienced as an investor. So why are so many people so angry? To listen to the Glenn Becks of the world, we've gone straight to hell in a handbasket, thanks to the triple threat of central banking, government bailouts and stimulus spending. And this is before any health-care reform is enacted, which will really unleash Armageddon.
The leading villains in countless conspiracy theories are Mr. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Rep. Ron Paul has introduced legislation to curb the independence of the Federal Reserve, and this summer told Mr. Bernanke that "the Federal Reserve, in collaboration with the giant banks, has created the greatest financial crisis the world has ever seen." Last week, Mr. Geithner confronted calls in Congress for his resignation and accusations that he is too cozy with Wall Street. Mr. Bernanke, Mr. Geithner, and then-Treasury secretary Henry Paulson played the leading roles in steering the nation through the perilous shoals of last year's financial crisis. The Obama administration, with Mr. Geithner at Treasury, has embraced continuity, essentially implementing policy set by the Republican Bush administration. The Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, was enacted on Mr. Bush's watch; the stimulus bill was pushed by the Obama White House. Taken together, they're about as close to a bipartisan approach as is likely to be achieved in Washington. This may be why Messrs. Bernanke and Geithner get attacked from both the left and right.
(snip)
I took the time to read TARP Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky's latest report, a detailed chronology of the American International Group bailout and its aftermath. With the luxury of hindsight, the report pointedly questions some of the mechanics of the bailout and related payments to AIG's counterparties. But it doesn't challenge the fundamental need for the bailout and cites the "systemic" risk of an AIG failure. Even if the criticisms are warranted, they strike me as footnotes to the fact that the AIG rescue was instrumental in staving off a 1930s-style global depression.
I hope most of the recent Fed- and Geithner-bashing is political theater, destined to subside as the economy improves, the unemployment rate drops, and prosperity returns to a broader swath of the population than those of us fortunate enough to have money in the stock market. Tinkering with the independence of the Federal Reserve could have dire consequences and shouldn't be undertaken in a spirit of vengeance. There's no doubt that many challenges lie ahead, and well-intentioned people of all political persuasions may—and should—have lively discussions and principled disagreements about how best to handle them. But distorting the past and scapegoating officials who have just rendered an enormous public service won't get us anywhere. We're a lot better off today than we were a year ago. This week I'll be giving thanks for that.
Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page D4
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703819904574555760305289146.html