Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“Rosebud”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:09 AM
Original message
“Rosebud”
“Rosebud”
By David Glenn Cox

Henry Ford helped to develop the mass production of automobiles and amassed a fortune. He then took that fortune and built Green Field Village, a collection of historic homes and shops to represent what nineteenth-century America was like before Ford’s invention helped to destroy it.

Charles Lindbergh was the first man to fly the Atlantic Ocean by himself, and he then took his fame and used it to preach political isolationism. Now Rupert Murdoch, media tycoon and Satan’s co-conspirator, has a new idea. His journalism ventures, like print and online ventures around the world, are losing money. Most of the revenue loss is due to a drop in advertising because of the gaping hole in the economy.

Anyone who has read any of Mr. Murdoch’s publications knows well that his business model is more about being profitable than being good or even accurate. Murdoch is the anti-Gutenberg, the Genghis Kahn of journalism. Why, any self-respecting planet would have put him in a NASA rocket and made him the first man on Mars long ago.

Mr. Murdoch’s vision for returning to profitability is to create a “paywall” that won’t allow Google or other search engines to aggregate Murdoch’s news content. Murdoch tried this with the Wall Street Journal, and the plan has failed miserably. This time he’s back, partnered with Bill "Broken Windows" Gates, trying to create a consortium to live behind the “paywall.” Gates has been trying to angle out Google with his own Bing search engine. You can almost see the snow globe slip from their hands, “Rosebud!”

Murdoch said in an interview on Sky News Australia this month that he may remove the company’s content from Google searches. The company’s newspapers include the Times of London and the New York Post. Media News, based in Denver, will block Google News from the content it puts behind a so-called paywall early next year at newspapers in Chico, California and York, Pennsylvania.

These two are seeking to put the genie they helped to create back in the bottle without ever realizing that she’s not a genie at all but a fat lady that can neither sing nor dance very well. Pay for News Corp product? A tax on the stupid! Henry Ford helped to create mass production, but most everything he attempted after that point was detrimental to the company, and Gates is following the Ford Model.

Gates tying himself to Rupert Murdoch is like tying yourself to John Wilkes Booth to sell more theater tickets. Windows revolutionized computer operating systems but since that point the Microsoft name has become synonymous with shoddy and poor performance along with a host of anti-competitive lawsuits. Gates loves the Capitalist system that made him fabulously wealthy so much that he wants to buy it.

If these people had their way, they would charge you for reading a newspaper left behind on a train. They are the sickest example of greed; they see news and public discourse as their private product. You wanna know where that hurricane's at out in the Gulf? “How much money you got?” Recently Fox went through the subscribers at Justin TV and threatened them with lawsuits for showing fifteen-year-old reruns of the Simpsons and Futurama.

Sometimes three hundred people were watching, but to the Fox minions up in Xanadu, those people are stealing nickels from us! The easy solution would have been to require them to play an advertising spot every thirty minutes. “Watch The Simpsons and all your favorites on Fox!” Instead their attitude was: stop it! It’s mine! Or “Just think, Smithers, if I had them all killed, they’d try to put me in jail!”

The fatal disconnect in this scheme between the dark lord and his sidekick, bad-haircut boy, is the ability to go around any walls that they might build. In the end they will only marginalize themselves; the walls they erect to make us pay for their content will only mark the borders of their Xanadu. Murdoch can walk its halls and admire its gems and antiquities like the phony crowd scenes behind Michele Bachmann at her anti-tax rally or the racist cartoons from the New York Post.

The beauty of the Internet is that there is always somewhere else to go. Always someone willing to accept ad revenue alone to build their readership. Personally, I read very little on American news websites. I prefer overseas sites for their different perspective, and I don’t read anything on Murdoch’s websites because I don’t have to. I already know what they have to say. Ditto with Bing, nothing hurts your prestige quite so much as who your partners are. Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas.

They are men who have had their great ideas and who now spend their lives trying to reinvent them until they ruin them or are replaced. Men surrounded by wealth unimaginable yet who dream every night of more! More and more because it fills them with a purpose; it fills the empty halls of Xanadu. They’ve come to believe that because of their power and wealth all of their ideas are great, and they surround themselves only with those who agree.

Nothing is quite so newsworthy to the public as watching the self-destruction of the powerful and the arrogant. It makes for a hell of a story as the snow globe rolls and smashes to the floor. Pitiful remembrances of once happier days, “Rosebud.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Murdock has always reminded me of that movie! K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Spot on!
Except that Windows wasn't MS's last great product, Excel was.

Windows has always been a Mac wannabee...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Wasn't Excel just a rip off of VisiCalc and Lotus 1-2-3 though? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I used all of them...
...Excel was a spreadsheet like VisiCalc. The difference was the macro language.

Excel had an extremely powerful and facile macro language that allowed me to control all facets of my Windows-based computer. This was back in the mid to late 80's when such control was difficult unless you were willing to write more elaborate code.

Excel was the best thing MS ever wrote.

By the way, VisiCalc was the first program I ever used (on an Apple II).

Thanks for the jog down memory lane...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. "Excel had [a] macro language that allowed me to control all facets of my Windows-based computer."
Yes, Microsoft has always come up with clever new ways to deliver viruses and trojans. Far as I'm concerned, Office macros are not a feature, they're a bug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. This was pre-internet...
It was also pre-Visual Basic, pre "Office".

There were no viruses or trojans in 1987.

I guess I'm showing my age. :hi:

It really was a really powerful language that was simple to learn. (I taught myself.)

Of course they threw it overboard when they introduced Visual Basic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. They threw *what* overboard?
Excel Macros?? Seriously, I don't know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Man, I didn't think anybody used Windows prior to 3.0
I was still hacking the Apple II in 1987. Knew some 6502 assembler back then, but it's all forgotten. Still run emulators though. My kids love Oregon Trail.

And there may have been no viruses in 1987, but the Great Internet Worm was 1988 and Michaelangelo was what, 1990? 1991?

Rock on, old timer.

(actually, now that I think about it, JSR $FBE2 rings the CTRL-G bell....)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Well, I used Windows 2.0. Not graphical. Text based Windows. Really!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Charles Foster Kane. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. I see things in a different light. Although I love this article.
Where is the vision of the people? This is what led them to buying Ford's cars and letting Murdoch bombard them with bs. Did they not think that their actions would have consequences? Maybe I'm odd, but when I felt my physical body changing, I did everything I could to help. I stopped drinking alcohol. Many wouldn't have done that.

There is a problem in that things change slowly. When the car was introduced, there was still beauty around us. But that didn't last long. When the media died, there was still a Cronkite. And it took decades for the evidence to emerge, that what we had been doing was poisonous.

The same thing is happening with global warming. People are focused on themselves rather than on the whole. Where is this mess going? If people looked up and out, they'd see. I'm worried they don't. And I fear there is suffering ahead, again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Great minds, etc. etc.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x394326 :)

Gates' primary motivation may be greed, but as for Murdoch; I believe the lust for power and influence via message control is tied with that deadly sin, if not a close second. Having convenient access to FOX "News" clips, makes their propaganda; shooting fish in a barrel easy to refute.

The consistent modus operandi of all Murdoch's corporate media holdings are overwhelmingly one sided opinions, I believe this reflects Murdoch's true character. He can't handle the give and take of serious democratic debate that challenges his pre-conceived notions.

In short Murdoch is a control freak and the Internet must keep his ass up at night, that's a good thing.:)

Thanks for the thread, David. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Windows did not revolutionalize computer operating systems
Windows is an application on top of a kernel. The kernel still contains code from MS-DOS 3.4.1 and behaves accordingly. Its memory model was out of date when I still had my baby teeth. Don't get me started.

UNIX was the revolution in computer operating systems. I won't bore you with the details but it was designed from the ground up to be scalable from tiny systems to monster mainframes. If it has to work, it's probably running UNIX. My best friend growing up now makes his living writing UNIX code for photocopiers.

What's been revolutionalized is the marketing of computers (and their operating systems). The pendulum has swayed back and forth between Apple and Microsoft including such memorable moments as the Apple 1984 ad (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYecfV3ubP8), and the current competing "PC vs Mac" and "I'm a PC" campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Agreed, revolutionalized the marketing
Henry Ford did not invent the automobile; he also did not invent mass production. The transmission on the Model T Ford was a Dodge Brother’s design. Most of the innovation in Ford’s manufacturing plant was because of his production chief Henry Leland. Yet Ford’s name was on the building and Ford’s name was on the cars and Ford was selling 1000 cars per working day. Because of that massive success Henry Ford is given credit for ideas that were not his own.

Such is the similar case of Bill Gates and Microsoft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mopar151 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Don't forget his brilliant engine designer, Bill Sullivan
Why did Chuck Berry say "Nothin' outrun my V-8 Ford!" Because Sullivan fought Ford tooth and nail to make the flathead V-8 with circulated, pressureized coolant and full pressure lubrication, it became the stuff of legends.

(Chevys had "trough and dipper" oiling to the connecting rods through "54)

Similarly, Jobs and Wozniak's intuitive, iconic GUI was the basis for much of Windows _ it was briefly licensed, and then blatantly stolen. Guys like Gates and Ford's "genius" lies in knowing what to steal. I used to work in an industry (plasma and thermal spray) that was rife with this.

Murdoch reminds me more of Mazak (who ripped off Burgmaster) and some Cad/Cam companies - they beleive that everything that ever passed through their hands still belongs to them, and they want to charge you for using it.If you obtain it, however legitimately, from another party, they still want fealty, license fees, and frightening money to support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost Jaguar Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Brilliant, top-notch stuff, as usual...
...These men you describe are really quite poor. Despite all their efforts, their shit still stinks and someday they will be worm food. No pyramid will save them from this fate. I pray for their enlightenment, so that in their next lives, they'll suffer less and maybe do good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC