Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More Militant Vegans, Less Ethical Butchers (Mickey Z.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 09:44 AM
Original message
More Militant Vegans, Less Ethical Butchers (Mickey Z.)


Mickey Z. -- World News Trust

Nov. 11, 2009 -- A friend of mine recently brought to my attention a former vegan who has now re-invented himself as the "Ethical Butcher" (a title right up there with Peacekeeper missiles, limited autonomy, and military intelligence). The butcher writes: "After 14 years as a vegetarian, a few of those as a quite 'militant' vegan, I became a butcher. The factors that went into me taking the position are many, but the result was maybe quite predictable. Within a month I was a full-fledged meat eater. What has not changed is my passion for the welfare of animals. Through my work as a butcher and chef, I now see a more direct way to influence and work for change in the meat industry and to improve the quality of life for all of the animals we rely on for food."

Such backlash in the face of compassionate evolution is not uncommon. For example, just as more and more women begin to challenge gender roles, the patriarchal culture countered with Howard Stern, Maxim, and Spike TV. But I digress…

Becoming a butcher in the name of animal welfare is like joining the Marines to promote peace. What's next, the Ethical Executioner with his "passion" for the "welfare" of prisoners? Surely, he'd just be choosing a "more direct way to influence and work for change," following the lead of his butcher comrade.

In a society less and less capable of critical, independent thought, this pro-meat character will probably be widely praised as the antidote to "militant" vegans. You know, the food Nazis. By current standards, you could pack a calf into a veal crate or pump food down a goose's gullet or grind up live male chicks to fertilize your fields and run no risk of being called militant. For that matter, you can clear cut forests, blow off mountain tops in search of coal, and drop white phosphorous on villages filled with brown children and garner virtually no attention at all…let alone be labeled a militant.

Choose a lifestyle of compassion and logic, speak out against vivisection, or protest the use of fur? You, my friends, are a worthy of a Hitler mustache.

more

http://worldnewstrust.com/commentary/3887-more-militant-vegans-less-ethical-butchers-mickey-z/itemid-30
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ethical Butcher!
Hahahahahaha!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craftsman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Honest congreesman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Corporate Democrat
Oh wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackintheGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. If your ethics do not prevent your eating meat
why can't you butcher meat ethically? Either position (the implied "meat-eating is intrinsically unethical" and its obverse) requires presuppositions about basic ethics. Once those are established, it is absolutely possible to act in all ways ethically re: butchering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. "like joining the Marines to promote peace"
I joined the Marines to promote peace. And I support local ranchers (and eat the meat they harvest) to help improve the conditions of animals.

Is this sarcasm or is the author really saying those are contradictions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC